Cargando…

Prospective Lymphedema Surveillance in a Clinic Setting

The potential impact of breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) is quite extensive, yet it often remains under-diagnosed until the later stages. This project examines the effectiveness of prospective surveillance in post-surgical breast cancer patients. A retrospective analysis of 49 out of 100 patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chance-Hetzler, Janet, Armer, Jane, Van Loo, Maggie, Anderson, Blake, Harris, Robin, Ewing, Rebecca, Stewart, Bob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4600150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26308061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm5030311
_version_ 1782394376720220160
author Chance-Hetzler, Janet
Armer, Jane
Van Loo, Maggie
Anderson, Blake
Harris, Robin
Ewing, Rebecca
Stewart, Bob
author_facet Chance-Hetzler, Janet
Armer, Jane
Van Loo, Maggie
Anderson, Blake
Harris, Robin
Ewing, Rebecca
Stewart, Bob
author_sort Chance-Hetzler, Janet
collection PubMed
description The potential impact of breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) is quite extensive, yet it often remains under-diagnosed until the later stages. This project examines the effectiveness of prospective surveillance in post-surgical breast cancer patients. A retrospective analysis of 49 out of 100 patients enrolled in a longitudinal prospective study at a Midwestern breast center evaluates: (1) time required for completion of bilateral limb measurements and Lymphedema Breast Cancer Questionnaire (LBCQ); (2) referral to LE management with limb volume increase (LVI) and/or LBCQ symptoms; and (3) cost of LE management at lower LVI (≥5%–≤10%) versus traditional (≥10%). Findings revealed a visit timeframe mean of 40.3 min (range = 25–60); 43.6% of visits were ≤30-min timeframe. Visit and measurement times decreased as clinic staff gained measurement experience; measurement time mean was 17.9 min (range = 16.9–18.9). LBCQ symptoms and LVI were significantly (p < 0.001) correlated to LE referral; six of the nine patients referred (67%) displayed both LBCQ symptoms/LVI. Visits with no symptoms reported did not result in referral, demonstrating the importance of using both indicators when assessing early LE. Lower threshold referral provides compelling evidence of potential cost savings over traditional threshold referral with reported costs of: $3755.00 and $6353.00, respectively (40.9% savings).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4600150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46001502015-10-15 Prospective Lymphedema Surveillance in a Clinic Setting Chance-Hetzler, Janet Armer, Jane Van Loo, Maggie Anderson, Blake Harris, Robin Ewing, Rebecca Stewart, Bob J Pers Med Article The potential impact of breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) is quite extensive, yet it often remains under-diagnosed until the later stages. This project examines the effectiveness of prospective surveillance in post-surgical breast cancer patients. A retrospective analysis of 49 out of 100 patients enrolled in a longitudinal prospective study at a Midwestern breast center evaluates: (1) time required for completion of bilateral limb measurements and Lymphedema Breast Cancer Questionnaire (LBCQ); (2) referral to LE management with limb volume increase (LVI) and/or LBCQ symptoms; and (3) cost of LE management at lower LVI (≥5%–≤10%) versus traditional (≥10%). Findings revealed a visit timeframe mean of 40.3 min (range = 25–60); 43.6% of visits were ≤30-min timeframe. Visit and measurement times decreased as clinic staff gained measurement experience; measurement time mean was 17.9 min (range = 16.9–18.9). LBCQ symptoms and LVI were significantly (p < 0.001) correlated to LE referral; six of the nine patients referred (67%) displayed both LBCQ symptoms/LVI. Visits with no symptoms reported did not result in referral, demonstrating the importance of using both indicators when assessing early LE. Lower threshold referral provides compelling evidence of potential cost savings over traditional threshold referral with reported costs of: $3755.00 and $6353.00, respectively (40.9% savings). MDPI 2015-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4600150/ /pubmed/26308061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm5030311 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chance-Hetzler, Janet
Armer, Jane
Van Loo, Maggie
Anderson, Blake
Harris, Robin
Ewing, Rebecca
Stewart, Bob
Prospective Lymphedema Surveillance in a Clinic Setting
title Prospective Lymphedema Surveillance in a Clinic Setting
title_full Prospective Lymphedema Surveillance in a Clinic Setting
title_fullStr Prospective Lymphedema Surveillance in a Clinic Setting
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Lymphedema Surveillance in a Clinic Setting
title_short Prospective Lymphedema Surveillance in a Clinic Setting
title_sort prospective lymphedema surveillance in a clinic setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4600150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26308061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm5030311
work_keys_str_mv AT chancehetzlerjanet prospectivelymphedemasurveillanceinaclinicsetting
AT armerjane prospectivelymphedemasurveillanceinaclinicsetting
AT vanloomaggie prospectivelymphedemasurveillanceinaclinicsetting
AT andersonblake prospectivelymphedemasurveillanceinaclinicsetting
AT harrisrobin prospectivelymphedemasurveillanceinaclinicsetting
AT ewingrebecca prospectivelymphedemasurveillanceinaclinicsetting
AT stewartbob prospectivelymphedemasurveillanceinaclinicsetting