Cargando…
Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour
BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer have an increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancers. It is important to distinguish whether these tumours are de novo or recurrences of the primary tumour in order to guide the appropriate therapy. Our aim was to investigate the use of DNA methylati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4600279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26452468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0 |
_version_ | 1782394400538624000 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Katie T. Mikeska, Thomas Li, Jason Takano, Elena A. Millar, Ewan K A Graham, Peter H. Boyle, Samantha E. Campbell, Ian G. Speed, Terence P. Dobrovic, Alexander Fox, Stephen B. |
author_facet | Huang, Katie T. Mikeska, Thomas Li, Jason Takano, Elena A. Millar, Ewan K A Graham, Peter H. Boyle, Samantha E. Campbell, Ian G. Speed, Terence P. Dobrovic, Alexander Fox, Stephen B. |
author_sort | Huang, Katie T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer have an increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancers. It is important to distinguish whether these tumours are de novo or recurrences of the primary tumour in order to guide the appropriate therapy. Our aim was to investigate the use of DNA methylation profiling and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to determine whether the second tumour is clonally related to the first tumour. METHODS: Methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting was used to screen promoter methylation in a panel of 13 genes reported as methylated in breast cancer (RASSF1A, TWIST1, APC, WIF1, MGMT, MAL, CDH13, RARβ, BRCA1, CDH1, CDKN2A, TP73, and GSTP1) in 29 tumour pairs (16 ipsilateral and 13 contralateral). Using the methylation profile of these genes, we employed a Bayesian and an empirical statistical approach to estimate clonal relationship. Copy number alterations were analysed using aCGH on the same set of tumour pairs. RESULTS: There is a higher probability of the second tumour being recurrent in ipsilateral tumours compared with contralateral tumours (38 % versus 8 %; p <0.05) based on the methylation profile. Using previously reported recurrence rates as Bayesian prior probabilities, we classified 69 % of ipsilateral and 15 % of contralateral tumours as recurrent. The inferred clonal relationship results of the tumour pairs were generally concordant between methylation profiling and aCGH. CONCLUSION: Our results show that DNA methylation profiling as well as aCGH have potential as diagnostic tools in improving the clinical decisions to differentiate recurrences from a second de novo tumour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4600279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46002792015-10-11 Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour Huang, Katie T. Mikeska, Thomas Li, Jason Takano, Elena A. Millar, Ewan K A Graham, Peter H. Boyle, Samantha E. Campbell, Ian G. Speed, Terence P. Dobrovic, Alexander Fox, Stephen B. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer have an increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancers. It is important to distinguish whether these tumours are de novo or recurrences of the primary tumour in order to guide the appropriate therapy. Our aim was to investigate the use of DNA methylation profiling and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to determine whether the second tumour is clonally related to the first tumour. METHODS: Methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting was used to screen promoter methylation in a panel of 13 genes reported as methylated in breast cancer (RASSF1A, TWIST1, APC, WIF1, MGMT, MAL, CDH13, RARβ, BRCA1, CDH1, CDKN2A, TP73, and GSTP1) in 29 tumour pairs (16 ipsilateral and 13 contralateral). Using the methylation profile of these genes, we employed a Bayesian and an empirical statistical approach to estimate clonal relationship. Copy number alterations were analysed using aCGH on the same set of tumour pairs. RESULTS: There is a higher probability of the second tumour being recurrent in ipsilateral tumours compared with contralateral tumours (38 % versus 8 %; p <0.05) based on the methylation profile. Using previously reported recurrence rates as Bayesian prior probabilities, we classified 69 % of ipsilateral and 15 % of contralateral tumours as recurrent. The inferred clonal relationship results of the tumour pairs were generally concordant between methylation profiling and aCGH. CONCLUSION: Our results show that DNA methylation profiling as well as aCGH have potential as diagnostic tools in improving the clinical decisions to differentiate recurrences from a second de novo tumour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4600279/ /pubmed/26452468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0 Text en © Huang et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Katie T. Mikeska, Thomas Li, Jason Takano, Elena A. Millar, Ewan K A Graham, Peter H. Boyle, Samantha E. Campbell, Ian G. Speed, Terence P. Dobrovic, Alexander Fox, Stephen B. Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour |
title | Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour |
title_full | Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour |
title_fullStr | Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour |
title_short | Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour |
title_sort | assessment of dna methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4600279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26452468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangkatiet assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT mikeskathomas assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT lijason assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT takanoelenaa assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT millarewanka assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT grahampeterh assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT boylesamanthae assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT campbelliang assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT speedterencep assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT dobrovicalexander assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour AT foxstephenb assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour |