Cargando…

Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer have an increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancers. It is important to distinguish whether these tumours are de novo or recurrences of the primary tumour in order to guide the appropriate therapy. Our aim was to investigate the use of DNA methylati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Katie T., Mikeska, Thomas, Li, Jason, Takano, Elena A., Millar, Ewan K A, Graham, Peter H., Boyle, Samantha E., Campbell, Ian G., Speed, Terence P., Dobrovic, Alexander, Fox, Stephen B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4600279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26452468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0
_version_ 1782394400538624000
author Huang, Katie T.
Mikeska, Thomas
Li, Jason
Takano, Elena A.
Millar, Ewan K A
Graham, Peter H.
Boyle, Samantha E.
Campbell, Ian G.
Speed, Terence P.
Dobrovic, Alexander
Fox, Stephen B.
author_facet Huang, Katie T.
Mikeska, Thomas
Li, Jason
Takano, Elena A.
Millar, Ewan K A
Graham, Peter H.
Boyle, Samantha E.
Campbell, Ian G.
Speed, Terence P.
Dobrovic, Alexander
Fox, Stephen B.
author_sort Huang, Katie T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer have an increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancers. It is important to distinguish whether these tumours are de novo or recurrences of the primary tumour in order to guide the appropriate therapy. Our aim was to investigate the use of DNA methylation profiling and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to determine whether the second tumour is clonally related to the first tumour. METHODS: Methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting was used to screen promoter methylation in a panel of 13 genes reported as methylated in breast cancer (RASSF1A, TWIST1, APC, WIF1, MGMT, MAL, CDH13, RARβ, BRCA1, CDH1, CDKN2A, TP73, and GSTP1) in 29 tumour pairs (16 ipsilateral and 13 contralateral). Using the methylation profile of these genes, we employed a Bayesian and an empirical statistical approach to estimate clonal relationship. Copy number alterations were analysed using aCGH on the same set of tumour pairs. RESULTS: There is a higher probability of the second tumour being recurrent in ipsilateral tumours compared with contralateral tumours (38 % versus 8 %; p <0.05) based on the methylation profile. Using previously reported recurrence rates as Bayesian prior probabilities, we classified 69 % of ipsilateral and 15 % of contralateral tumours as recurrent. The inferred clonal relationship results of the tumour pairs were generally concordant between methylation profiling and aCGH. CONCLUSION: Our results show that DNA methylation profiling as well as aCGH have potential as diagnostic tools in improving the clinical decisions to differentiate recurrences from a second de novo tumour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4600279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46002792015-10-11 Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour Huang, Katie T. Mikeska, Thomas Li, Jason Takano, Elena A. Millar, Ewan K A Graham, Peter H. Boyle, Samantha E. Campbell, Ian G. Speed, Terence P. Dobrovic, Alexander Fox, Stephen B. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer have an increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancers. It is important to distinguish whether these tumours are de novo or recurrences of the primary tumour in order to guide the appropriate therapy. Our aim was to investigate the use of DNA methylation profiling and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to determine whether the second tumour is clonally related to the first tumour. METHODS: Methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting was used to screen promoter methylation in a panel of 13 genes reported as methylated in breast cancer (RASSF1A, TWIST1, APC, WIF1, MGMT, MAL, CDH13, RARβ, BRCA1, CDH1, CDKN2A, TP73, and GSTP1) in 29 tumour pairs (16 ipsilateral and 13 contralateral). Using the methylation profile of these genes, we employed a Bayesian and an empirical statistical approach to estimate clonal relationship. Copy number alterations were analysed using aCGH on the same set of tumour pairs. RESULTS: There is a higher probability of the second tumour being recurrent in ipsilateral tumours compared with contralateral tumours (38 % versus 8 %; p <0.05) based on the methylation profile. Using previously reported recurrence rates as Bayesian prior probabilities, we classified 69 % of ipsilateral and 15 % of contralateral tumours as recurrent. The inferred clonal relationship results of the tumour pairs were generally concordant between methylation profiling and aCGH. CONCLUSION: Our results show that DNA methylation profiling as well as aCGH have potential as diagnostic tools in improving the clinical decisions to differentiate recurrences from a second de novo tumour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4600279/ /pubmed/26452468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0 Text en © Huang et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Katie T.
Mikeska, Thomas
Li, Jason
Takano, Elena A.
Millar, Ewan K A
Graham, Peter H.
Boyle, Samantha E.
Campbell, Ian G.
Speed, Terence P.
Dobrovic, Alexander
Fox, Stephen B.
Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour
title Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour
title_full Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour
title_fullStr Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour
title_short Assessment of DNA methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour
title_sort assessment of dna methylation profiling and copy number variation as indications of clonal relationship in ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancers to distinguish recurrent breast cancer from a second primary tumour
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4600279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26452468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1676-0
work_keys_str_mv AT huangkatiet assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT mikeskathomas assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT lijason assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT takanoelenaa assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT millarewanka assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT grahampeterh assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT boylesamanthae assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT campbelliang assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT speedterencep assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT dobrovicalexander assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour
AT foxstephenb assessmentofdnamethylationprofilingandcopynumbervariationasindicationsofclonalrelationshipinipsilateralandcontralateralbreastcancerstodistinguishrecurrentbreastcancerfromasecondprimarytumour