Cargando…
Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR - in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR - are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to: 1...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26456585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14914 |
_version_ | 1782394505951969280 |
---|---|
author | Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. Johansson, Olle Carlo, George L. |
author_facet | Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. Johansson, Olle Carlo, George L. |
author_sort | Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR - in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR - are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to: 1) Ability to produce constructive interference effects and amplify their intensities at many locations. 2) Ability to force all charged/polar molecules and especially free ions within and around all living cells to oscillate on parallel planes and in phase with the applied polarized field. Such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membrane electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell’s electrochemical balance. These features render man-made EMFs/EMR more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs/EMR. This explains the increasing number of biological effects discovered during the past few decades to be induced by man-made EMFs, in contrast to natural EMFs in the terrestrial environment which have always been present throughout evolution, although human exposure to the latter ones is normally of significantly higher intensities/energy and longer durations. Thus, polarization seems to be a trigger that significantly increases the probability for the initiation of biological/health effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4601073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46010732015-10-21 Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. Johansson, Olle Carlo, George L. Sci Rep Article In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR - in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR - are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to: 1) Ability to produce constructive interference effects and amplify their intensities at many locations. 2) Ability to force all charged/polar molecules and especially free ions within and around all living cells to oscillate on parallel planes and in phase with the applied polarized field. Such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membrane electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell’s electrochemical balance. These features render man-made EMFs/EMR more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs/EMR. This explains the increasing number of biological effects discovered during the past few decades to be induced by man-made EMFs, in contrast to natural EMFs in the terrestrial environment which have always been present throughout evolution, although human exposure to the latter ones is normally of significantly higher intensities/energy and longer durations. Thus, polarization seems to be a trigger that significantly increases the probability for the initiation of biological/health effects. Nature Publishing Group 2015-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4601073/ /pubmed/26456585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14914 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. Johansson, Olle Carlo, George L. Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity |
title | Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity |
title_full | Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity |
title_fullStr | Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity |
title_full_unstemmed | Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity |
title_short | Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity |
title_sort | polarization: a key difference between man-made and natural electromagnetic fields, in regard to biological activity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26456585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14914 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panagopoulosdimitrisj polarizationakeydifferencebetweenmanmadeandnaturalelectromagneticfieldsinregardtobiologicalactivity AT johanssonolle polarizationakeydifferencebetweenmanmadeandnaturalelectromagneticfieldsinregardtobiologicalactivity AT carlogeorgel polarizationakeydifferencebetweenmanmadeandnaturalelectromagneticfieldsinregardtobiologicalactivity |