Cargando…

Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity

In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR - in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR - are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to: 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panagopoulos, Dimitris J., Johansson, Olle, Carlo, George L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26456585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14914
_version_ 1782394505951969280
author Panagopoulos, Dimitris J.
Johansson, Olle
Carlo, George L.
author_facet Panagopoulos, Dimitris J.
Johansson, Olle
Carlo, George L.
author_sort Panagopoulos, Dimitris J.
collection PubMed
description In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR - in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR - are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to: 1) Ability to produce constructive interference effects and amplify their intensities at many locations. 2) Ability to force all charged/polar molecules and especially free ions within and around all living cells to oscillate on parallel planes and in phase with the applied polarized field. Such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membrane electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell’s electrochemical balance. These features render man-made EMFs/EMR more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs/EMR. This explains the increasing number of biological effects discovered during the past few decades to be induced by man-made EMFs, in contrast to natural EMFs in the terrestrial environment which have always been present throughout evolution, although human exposure to the latter ones is normally of significantly higher intensities/energy and longer durations. Thus, polarization seems to be a trigger that significantly increases the probability for the initiation of biological/health effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4601073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46010732015-10-21 Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity Panagopoulos, Dimitris J. Johansson, Olle Carlo, George L. Sci Rep Article In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR - in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR - are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to: 1) Ability to produce constructive interference effects and amplify their intensities at many locations. 2) Ability to force all charged/polar molecules and especially free ions within and around all living cells to oscillate on parallel planes and in phase with the applied polarized field. Such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membrane electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell’s electrochemical balance. These features render man-made EMFs/EMR more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs/EMR. This explains the increasing number of biological effects discovered during the past few decades to be induced by man-made EMFs, in contrast to natural EMFs in the terrestrial environment which have always been present throughout evolution, although human exposure to the latter ones is normally of significantly higher intensities/energy and longer durations. Thus, polarization seems to be a trigger that significantly increases the probability for the initiation of biological/health effects. Nature Publishing Group 2015-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4601073/ /pubmed/26456585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14914 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Panagopoulos, Dimitris J.
Johansson, Olle
Carlo, George L.
Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
title Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
title_full Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
title_fullStr Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
title_full_unstemmed Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
title_short Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
title_sort polarization: a key difference between man-made and natural electromagnetic fields, in regard to biological activity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26456585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14914
work_keys_str_mv AT panagopoulosdimitrisj polarizationakeydifferencebetweenmanmadeandnaturalelectromagneticfieldsinregardtobiologicalactivity
AT johanssonolle polarizationakeydifferencebetweenmanmadeandnaturalelectromagneticfieldsinregardtobiologicalactivity
AT carlogeorgel polarizationakeydifferencebetweenmanmadeandnaturalelectromagneticfieldsinregardtobiologicalactivity