Cargando…
Visual aftereffects and sensory nonlinearities from a single statistical framework
When adapted to a particular scenery our senses may fool us: colors are misinterpreted, certain spatial patterns seem to fade out, and static objects appear to move in reverse. A mere empirical description of the mechanisms tuned to color, texture, and motion may tell us where these visual illusions...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00557 |
_version_ | 1782394661969592320 |
---|---|
author | Laparra, Valero Malo, Jesús |
author_facet | Laparra, Valero Malo, Jesús |
author_sort | Laparra, Valero |
collection | PubMed |
description | When adapted to a particular scenery our senses may fool us: colors are misinterpreted, certain spatial patterns seem to fade out, and static objects appear to move in reverse. A mere empirical description of the mechanisms tuned to color, texture, and motion may tell us where these visual illusions come from. However, such empirical models of gain control do not explain why these mechanisms work in this apparently dysfunctional manner. Current normative explanations of aftereffects based on scene statistics derive gain changes by (1) invoking decorrelation and linear manifold matching/equalization, or (2) using nonlinear divisive normalization obtained from parametric scene models. These principled approaches have different drawbacks: the first is not compatible with the known saturation nonlinearities in the sensors and it cannot fully accomplish information maximization due to its linear nature. In the second, gain change is almost determined a priori by the assumed parametric image model linked to divisive normalization. In this study we show that both the response changes that lead to aftereffects and the nonlinear behavior can be simultaneously derived from a single statistical framework: the Sequential Principal Curves Analysis (SPCA). As opposed to mechanistic models, SPCA is not intended to describe how physiological sensors work, but it is focused on explaining why they behave as they do. Nonparametric SPCA has two key advantages as a normative model of adaptation: (i) it is better than linear techniques as it is a flexible equalization that can be tuned for more sensible criteria other than plain decorrelation (either full information maximization or error minimization); and (ii) it makes no a priori functional assumption regarding the nonlinearity, so the saturations emerge directly from the scene data and the goal (and not from the assumed function). It turns out that the optimal responses derived from these more sensible criteria and SPCA are consistent with dysfunctional behaviors such as aftereffects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4602147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46021472015-11-02 Visual aftereffects and sensory nonlinearities from a single statistical framework Laparra, Valero Malo, Jesús Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience When adapted to a particular scenery our senses may fool us: colors are misinterpreted, certain spatial patterns seem to fade out, and static objects appear to move in reverse. A mere empirical description of the mechanisms tuned to color, texture, and motion may tell us where these visual illusions come from. However, such empirical models of gain control do not explain why these mechanisms work in this apparently dysfunctional manner. Current normative explanations of aftereffects based on scene statistics derive gain changes by (1) invoking decorrelation and linear manifold matching/equalization, or (2) using nonlinear divisive normalization obtained from parametric scene models. These principled approaches have different drawbacks: the first is not compatible with the known saturation nonlinearities in the sensors and it cannot fully accomplish information maximization due to its linear nature. In the second, gain change is almost determined a priori by the assumed parametric image model linked to divisive normalization. In this study we show that both the response changes that lead to aftereffects and the nonlinear behavior can be simultaneously derived from a single statistical framework: the Sequential Principal Curves Analysis (SPCA). As opposed to mechanistic models, SPCA is not intended to describe how physiological sensors work, but it is focused on explaining why they behave as they do. Nonparametric SPCA has two key advantages as a normative model of adaptation: (i) it is better than linear techniques as it is a flexible equalization that can be tuned for more sensible criteria other than plain decorrelation (either full information maximization or error minimization); and (ii) it makes no a priori functional assumption regarding the nonlinearity, so the saturations emerge directly from the scene data and the goal (and not from the assumed function). It turns out that the optimal responses derived from these more sensible criteria and SPCA are consistent with dysfunctional behaviors such as aftereffects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4602147/ /pubmed/26528165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00557 Text en Copyright © 2015 Laparra and Malo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Laparra, Valero Malo, Jesús Visual aftereffects and sensory nonlinearities from a single statistical framework |
title | Visual aftereffects and sensory nonlinearities from a single statistical framework |
title_full | Visual aftereffects and sensory nonlinearities from a single statistical framework |
title_fullStr | Visual aftereffects and sensory nonlinearities from a single statistical framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual aftereffects and sensory nonlinearities from a single statistical framework |
title_short | Visual aftereffects and sensory nonlinearities from a single statistical framework |
title_sort | visual aftereffects and sensory nonlinearities from a single statistical framework |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laparravalero visualaftereffectsandsensorynonlinearitiesfromasinglestatisticalframework AT malojesus visualaftereffectsandsensorynonlinearitiesfromasinglestatisticalframework |