Cargando…

Effects of Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine on Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review

Traditional Chinese patent medicine (TCPM) is widely used for essential hypertension (EH) in China. However, there is no critically appraised evidence, such as systematic reviews or meta-analyses, regarding the potential benefits and disadvantages of TCPM to justify their clinical use and recommenda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Xingjiang, Wang, Pengqian, Zhang, Yuqing, Li, Xiaoke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000442
_version_ 1782394777123160064
author Xiong, Xingjiang
Wang, Pengqian
Zhang, Yuqing
Li, Xiaoke
author_facet Xiong, Xingjiang
Wang, Pengqian
Zhang, Yuqing
Li, Xiaoke
author_sort Xiong, Xingjiang
collection PubMed
description Traditional Chinese patent medicine (TCPM) is widely used for essential hypertension (EH) in China. However, there is no critically appraised evidence, such as systematic reviews or meta-analyses, regarding the potential benefits and disadvantages of TCPM to justify their clinical use and recommendation. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate and meta-analyze the effects of TCPM for EH. Seven databases, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Scientific Journal Database, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Wanfang Database, were searched from their inception to August 2014 for relevant studies that compared one TCPM plus antihypertensive drugs versus antihypertensive drugs alone. The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome measures were mortality or progression to severe complications and adverse events. The secondary outcome measures were blood pressure (BP) and quality of life (QOL). Seventy-three trials, which included 8138 patients, on 17 TCPMs were included. In general, the methodological quality was low. Two trials evaluated the effects of TCPMs on mortality and the progression to severe complications after treatment, and no significant difference was identified compared with antihypertensive drugs alone. No severe adverse events were reported. Thirteen TCPMs used in complementary therapy significantly decreased systolic BP by 3.94 to 13.50 mmHg and diastolic BP by 2.28 to 11.25 mmHg. QOL was significantly improved by TCPM plus antihypertensive drugs compared with antihypertensive drugs alone. This systematic review provided the first classification of clinical evidence for the effectiveness of TCPM for EH. The usage of TCPMs for EH was supported by evidence of class level III. As a result of the methodological drawbacks of the included studies, more rigorously designed randomized controlled trials that focus on mortality and cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up are warranted before TCPM can be recommended for hypertensive patients. Two TCPMs, Song ling xue mai kang capsules and Yang xue qing nao granules, should be prioritized for further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4602722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46027222015-10-27 Effects of Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine on Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review Xiong, Xingjiang Wang, Pengqian Zhang, Yuqing Li, Xiaoke Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 Traditional Chinese patent medicine (TCPM) is widely used for essential hypertension (EH) in China. However, there is no critically appraised evidence, such as systematic reviews or meta-analyses, regarding the potential benefits and disadvantages of TCPM to justify their clinical use and recommendation. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate and meta-analyze the effects of TCPM for EH. Seven databases, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Scientific Journal Database, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Wanfang Database, were searched from their inception to August 2014 for relevant studies that compared one TCPM plus antihypertensive drugs versus antihypertensive drugs alone. The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome measures were mortality or progression to severe complications and adverse events. The secondary outcome measures were blood pressure (BP) and quality of life (QOL). Seventy-three trials, which included 8138 patients, on 17 TCPMs were included. In general, the methodological quality was low. Two trials evaluated the effects of TCPMs on mortality and the progression to severe complications after treatment, and no significant difference was identified compared with antihypertensive drugs alone. No severe adverse events were reported. Thirteen TCPMs used in complementary therapy significantly decreased systolic BP by 3.94 to 13.50 mmHg and diastolic BP by 2.28 to 11.25 mmHg. QOL was significantly improved by TCPM plus antihypertensive drugs compared with antihypertensive drugs alone. This systematic review provided the first classification of clinical evidence for the effectiveness of TCPM for EH. The usage of TCPMs for EH was supported by evidence of class level III. As a result of the methodological drawbacks of the included studies, more rigorously designed randomized controlled trials that focus on mortality and cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up are warranted before TCPM can be recommended for hypertensive patients. Two TCPMs, Song ling xue mai kang capsules and Yang xue qing nao granules, should be prioritized for further research. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4602722/ /pubmed/25654379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000442 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Xiong, Xingjiang
Wang, Pengqian
Zhang, Yuqing
Li, Xiaoke
Effects of Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine on Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title Effects of Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine on Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_full Effects of Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine on Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effects of Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine on Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine on Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_short Effects of Traditional Chinese Patent Medicine on Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review
title_sort effects of traditional chinese patent medicine on essential hypertension: a systematic review
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000442
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongxingjiang effectsoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineonessentialhypertensionasystematicreview
AT wangpengqian effectsoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineonessentialhypertensionasystematicreview
AT zhangyuqing effectsoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineonessentialhypertensionasystematicreview
AT lixiaoke effectsoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineonessentialhypertensionasystematicreview