Cargando…
Signet Ring Cell Histology Is Not an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Analysis by the KLASS Group
Whether signet ring cell (SRC) histology carries a worse prognosis than other forms of gastric adenocarcinoma has been questioned. The present study investigated the differences in clinicopathologic features and survival between SRC and non-SRC adenocarcinoma. The prospectively collected data of 264...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000136 |
_version_ | 1782394789429248000 |
---|---|
author | Shim, Jung Ho Song, Kyo Young Kim, Hyung-Ho Han, Sang-Uk Kim, Min-Chan Hyung, Woo Jin Kim, Wook Lee, Hyuk-Joon Ryu, Seung Wan Cho, Gyu Seok Ryu, Seong Yeob |
author_facet | Shim, Jung Ho Song, Kyo Young Kim, Hyung-Ho Han, Sang-Uk Kim, Min-Chan Hyung, Woo Jin Kim, Wook Lee, Hyuk-Joon Ryu, Seung Wan Cho, Gyu Seok Ryu, Seong Yeob |
author_sort | Shim, Jung Ho |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whether signet ring cell (SRC) histology carries a worse prognosis than other forms of gastric adenocarcinoma has been questioned. The present study investigated the differences in clinicopathologic features and survival between SRC and non-SRC adenocarcinoma. The prospectively collected data of 2643 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy between 1998 and 2005 by 10 surgeons were reviewed. Additionally, we employed analysis of covariance, propensity-score risk adjustment, and propensity-based matching to account for possible selection bias. The baseline characteristics of prematched patients with SRC or non-SRC adenocarcinoma histology differed: SRC presented in younger patients and less often in men, was more likely found in the middle stomach, and was more likely to be Stage I. After applying the propensity-score strata and propensity-score matching, there was no difference in the baseline characteristics, and SRC was not an independent risk factor for mortality in the same stage. SRC is not an independent predictor of poor prognosis after curative resection for gastric cancer in Korea. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4602776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46027762015-10-27 Signet Ring Cell Histology Is Not an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Analysis by the KLASS Group Shim, Jung Ho Song, Kyo Young Kim, Hyung-Ho Han, Sang-Uk Kim, Min-Chan Hyung, Woo Jin Kim, Wook Lee, Hyuk-Joon Ryu, Seung Wan Cho, Gyu Seok Ryu, Seong Yeob Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 Whether signet ring cell (SRC) histology carries a worse prognosis than other forms of gastric adenocarcinoma has been questioned. The present study investigated the differences in clinicopathologic features and survival between SRC and non-SRC adenocarcinoma. The prospectively collected data of 2643 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy between 1998 and 2005 by 10 surgeons were reviewed. Additionally, we employed analysis of covariance, propensity-score risk adjustment, and propensity-based matching to account for possible selection bias. The baseline characteristics of prematched patients with SRC or non-SRC adenocarcinoma histology differed: SRC presented in younger patients and less often in men, was more likely found in the middle stomach, and was more likely to be Stage I. After applying the propensity-score strata and propensity-score matching, there was no difference in the baseline characteristics, and SRC was not an independent risk factor for mortality in the same stage. SRC is not an independent predictor of poor prognosis after curative resection for gastric cancer in Korea. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4602776/ /pubmed/25501051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000136 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4500 Shim, Jung Ho Song, Kyo Young Kim, Hyung-Ho Han, Sang-Uk Kim, Min-Chan Hyung, Woo Jin Kim, Wook Lee, Hyuk-Joon Ryu, Seung Wan Cho, Gyu Seok Ryu, Seong Yeob Signet Ring Cell Histology Is Not an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Analysis by the KLASS Group |
title | Signet Ring Cell Histology Is Not an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Analysis by the KLASS Group |
title_full | Signet Ring Cell Histology Is Not an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Analysis by the KLASS Group |
title_fullStr | Signet Ring Cell Histology Is Not an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Analysis by the KLASS Group |
title_full_unstemmed | Signet Ring Cell Histology Is Not an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Analysis by the KLASS Group |
title_short | Signet Ring Cell Histology Is Not an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Analysis by the KLASS Group |
title_sort | signet ring cell histology is not an independent predictor of poor prognosis after curative resection for gastric cancer: a propensity analysis by the klass group |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimjungho signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT songkyoyoung signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT kimhyungho signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT hansanguk signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT kimminchan signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT hyungwoojin signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT kimwook signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT leehyukjoon signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT ryuseungwan signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT chogyuseok signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup AT ryuseongyeob signetringcellhistologyisnotanindependentpredictorofpoorprognosisaftercurativeresectionforgastriccancerapropensityanalysisbytheklassgroup |