Cargando…

Effect of Blinding With a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study

Placebo control is a useful method for determining the efficacy of a therapy. In acupuncture researches, the preferred method for placebo control is acupuncture using a placebo needle that has a blunt tip and achieves no skin penetration. We performed a crossover study to validate the blinding effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Baoyan, Xu, Huanfang, Ma, Rui, Mo, Qian, Yan, Shiyan, Liu, Zhishun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000200
_version_ 1782394795535106048
author Liu, Baoyan
Xu, Huanfang
Ma, Rui
Mo, Qian
Yan, Shiyan
Liu, Zhishun
author_facet Liu, Baoyan
Xu, Huanfang
Ma, Rui
Mo, Qian
Yan, Shiyan
Liu, Zhishun
author_sort Liu, Baoyan
collection PubMed
description Placebo control is a useful method for determining the efficacy of a therapy. In acupuncture researches, the preferred method for placebo control is acupuncture using a placebo needle that has a blunt tip and achieves no skin penetration. We performed a crossover study to validate the blinding effect of a new type of placebo needle. Sixty volunteers were randomized to receive acupuncture using 2 types of needles with different sequences: sequence AB, involving first the pragmatic placebo needle and then the real needle, and sequence BA, in a reverse order. Placebo acupuncture was performed by administering the placebo needle through an adhesive pad without skin penetration on the acupoints LI4, RN12, BL25, and BL36. Real acupuncture was performed by needling through the pad and penetrating the skin to 15 mm using a real needle on the same acupoints. The acupuncture was administered every other day with 3 sessions for 1 type of needle. The primary outcome was the perception of needle penetration. Besides degree of acupuncture pain, type, and degree of needle sensation, needle acceptability and factors influencing the subject blinding effect were assessed. Needle penetration was felt by 100%, 90% (54/60), 88.3% (53/60), and 95% (57/60) of volunteers receiving placebo acupuncture and 98.3% (59/60), 96.7% (58/60), 95% (57/60), and 95% (57/60) of volunteers receiving real acupuncture on LI4, RN12, BL25, and BL36, respectively. Differences of the volunteers’ perception of needle penetration between the placebo needle and real needle were not significant for the 4 acupoints (all P > 0.05). Volunteers experienced fewer distension sensations (P = 0.01), a lower degree of needle sensation (P = 0.007), and less pain (P = 0.006) during placebo acupuncture than during real acupuncture. The placebo needle was more easily accepted than the real needle (OR = 1.63, 95% CI, 1.01–2.64). The influences of age, sex, educational level, acupuncture experience, needle sensation, acupuncture pain, and needle acceptability on volunteers’ perception of needle penetration were not significant. The pragmatic placebo needle is a valid control for acupuncture research. It produces a good subject blinding effect with a similar appearance to conventional acupuncture needles and no skin penetration when applied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4602803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46028032015-10-27 Effect of Blinding With a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study Liu, Baoyan Xu, Huanfang Ma, Rui Mo, Qian Yan, Shiyan Liu, Zhishun Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 Placebo control is a useful method for determining the efficacy of a therapy. In acupuncture researches, the preferred method for placebo control is acupuncture using a placebo needle that has a blunt tip and achieves no skin penetration. We performed a crossover study to validate the blinding effect of a new type of placebo needle. Sixty volunteers were randomized to receive acupuncture using 2 types of needles with different sequences: sequence AB, involving first the pragmatic placebo needle and then the real needle, and sequence BA, in a reverse order. Placebo acupuncture was performed by administering the placebo needle through an adhesive pad without skin penetration on the acupoints LI4, RN12, BL25, and BL36. Real acupuncture was performed by needling through the pad and penetrating the skin to 15 mm using a real needle on the same acupoints. The acupuncture was administered every other day with 3 sessions for 1 type of needle. The primary outcome was the perception of needle penetration. Besides degree of acupuncture pain, type, and degree of needle sensation, needle acceptability and factors influencing the subject blinding effect were assessed. Needle penetration was felt by 100%, 90% (54/60), 88.3% (53/60), and 95% (57/60) of volunteers receiving placebo acupuncture and 98.3% (59/60), 96.7% (58/60), 95% (57/60), and 95% (57/60) of volunteers receiving real acupuncture on LI4, RN12, BL25, and BL36, respectively. Differences of the volunteers’ perception of needle penetration between the placebo needle and real needle were not significant for the 4 acupoints (all P > 0.05). Volunteers experienced fewer distension sensations (P = 0.01), a lower degree of needle sensation (P = 0.007), and less pain (P = 0.006) during placebo acupuncture than during real acupuncture. The placebo needle was more easily accepted than the real needle (OR = 1.63, 95% CI, 1.01–2.64). The influences of age, sex, educational level, acupuncture experience, needle sensation, acupuncture pain, and needle acceptability on volunteers’ perception of needle penetration were not significant. The pragmatic placebo needle is a valid control for acupuncture research. It produces a good subject blinding effect with a similar appearance to conventional acupuncture needles and no skin penetration when applied. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4602803/ /pubmed/25501074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000200 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Liu, Baoyan
Xu, Huanfang
Ma, Rui
Mo, Qian
Yan, Shiyan
Liu, Zhishun
Effect of Blinding With a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title Effect of Blinding With a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_full Effect of Blinding With a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_fullStr Effect of Blinding With a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Blinding With a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_short Effect of Blinding With a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study
title_sort effect of blinding with a new pragmatic placebo needle: a randomized controlled crossover study
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000200
work_keys_str_mv AT liubaoyan effectofblindingwithanewpragmaticplaceboneedlearandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT xuhuanfang effectofblindingwithanewpragmaticplaceboneedlearandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT marui effectofblindingwithanewpragmaticplaceboneedlearandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT moqian effectofblindingwithanewpragmaticplaceboneedlearandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT yanshiyan effectofblindingwithanewpragmaticplaceboneedlearandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT liuzhishun effectofblindingwithanewpragmaticplaceboneedlearandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy