Cargando…
Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
This retrospective study compared efficacy and safety of fludarabine combined with intermediate-dose cytarabine (FA regimen) versus high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC regimen) as consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who achieved complete remission. Disease-free survival (DFS) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000134 |
_version_ | 1782394795759501312 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Wenjun Ding, Yi Wu, Hao Chen, Yuhua Lu, Huina Chen, Chunying Fu, Jianfei Wang, Weiguang Liang, Aibin Zou, Shanhua |
author_facet | Zhang, Wenjun Ding, Yi Wu, Hao Chen, Yuhua Lu, Huina Chen, Chunying Fu, Jianfei Wang, Weiguang Liang, Aibin Zou, Shanhua |
author_sort | Zhang, Wenjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | This retrospective study compared efficacy and safety of fludarabine combined with intermediate-dose cytarabine (FA regimen) versus high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC regimen) as consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who achieved complete remission. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) based on age (≥60, <60 years) and cytogenetics were evaluated from data between January 2005 and March 2013. Total 82 patients (FA, n = 45; HiDAC, n = 37; 14–65 years) were evaluated. Five-year DFS was 32.0% and 36.2% for FA and HiDAC groups, respectively (P = 0.729), and 5-year OS was 39.5% and 47.8% (P = 0.568), respectively. Among older patients (≥60 years), 3-year DFS was 26.0% for FA group and 12.5% for HiDAC group (P = 0.032), and 3-year OS was 34.6% and 12.5%, respectively (P = 0.026). In FA group, hematological toxicities were significantly lower. FA regimen was as effective as HiDAC regimen in patients with good/intermediate cytogenetics and significantly improved DFS and OS in older patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4602804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46028042015-10-27 Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Zhang, Wenjun Ding, Yi Wu, Hao Chen, Yuhua Lu, Huina Chen, Chunying Fu, Jianfei Wang, Weiguang Liang, Aibin Zou, Shanhua Medicine (Baltimore) 4800 This retrospective study compared efficacy and safety of fludarabine combined with intermediate-dose cytarabine (FA regimen) versus high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC regimen) as consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who achieved complete remission. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) based on age (≥60, <60 years) and cytogenetics were evaluated from data between January 2005 and March 2013. Total 82 patients (FA, n = 45; HiDAC, n = 37; 14–65 years) were evaluated. Five-year DFS was 32.0% and 36.2% for FA and HiDAC groups, respectively (P = 0.729), and 5-year OS was 39.5% and 47.8% (P = 0.568), respectively. Among older patients (≥60 years), 3-year DFS was 26.0% for FA group and 12.5% for HiDAC group (P = 0.032), and 3-year OS was 34.6% and 12.5%, respectively (P = 0.026). In FA group, hematological toxicities were significantly lower. FA regimen was as effective as HiDAC regimen in patients with good/intermediate cytogenetics and significantly improved DFS and OS in older patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4602804/ /pubmed/25501050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000134 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4800 Zhang, Wenjun Ding, Yi Wu, Hao Chen, Yuhua Lu, Huina Chen, Chunying Fu, Jianfei Wang, Weiguang Liang, Aibin Zou, Shanhua Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title | Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full | Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_fullStr | Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_short | Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_sort | retrospective comparison of fludarabine in combination with intermediate-dose cytarabine versus high-dose cytarabine as consolidation therapies for acute myeloid leukemia |
topic | 4800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangwenjun retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia AT dingyi retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia AT wuhao retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia AT chenyuhua retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia AT luhuina retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia AT chenchunying retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia AT fujianfei retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia AT wangweiguang retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia AT liangaibin retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia AT zoushanhua retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia |