Cargando…

Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

This retrospective study compared efficacy and safety of fludarabine combined with intermediate-dose cytarabine (FA regimen) versus high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC regimen) as consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who achieved complete remission. Disease-free survival (DFS) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wenjun, Ding, Yi, Wu, Hao, Chen, Yuhua, Lu, Huina, Chen, Chunying, Fu, Jianfei, Wang, Weiguang, Liang, Aibin, Zou, Shanhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000134
_version_ 1782394795759501312
author Zhang, Wenjun
Ding, Yi
Wu, Hao
Chen, Yuhua
Lu, Huina
Chen, Chunying
Fu, Jianfei
Wang, Weiguang
Liang, Aibin
Zou, Shanhua
author_facet Zhang, Wenjun
Ding, Yi
Wu, Hao
Chen, Yuhua
Lu, Huina
Chen, Chunying
Fu, Jianfei
Wang, Weiguang
Liang, Aibin
Zou, Shanhua
author_sort Zhang, Wenjun
collection PubMed
description This retrospective study compared efficacy and safety of fludarabine combined with intermediate-dose cytarabine (FA regimen) versus high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC regimen) as consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who achieved complete remission. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) based on age (≥60, <60 years) and cytogenetics were evaluated from data between January 2005 and March 2013. Total 82 patients (FA, n = 45; HiDAC, n = 37; 14–65 years) were evaluated. Five-year DFS was 32.0% and 36.2% for FA and HiDAC groups, respectively (P = 0.729), and 5-year OS was 39.5% and 47.8% (P = 0.568), respectively. Among older patients (≥60 years), 3-year DFS was 26.0% for FA group and 12.5% for HiDAC group (P = 0.032), and 3-year OS was 34.6% and 12.5%, respectively (P = 0.026). In FA group, hematological toxicities were significantly lower. FA regimen was as effective as HiDAC regimen in patients with good/intermediate cytogenetics and significantly improved DFS and OS in older patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4602804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46028042015-10-27 Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Zhang, Wenjun Ding, Yi Wu, Hao Chen, Yuhua Lu, Huina Chen, Chunying Fu, Jianfei Wang, Weiguang Liang, Aibin Zou, Shanhua Medicine (Baltimore) 4800 This retrospective study compared efficacy and safety of fludarabine combined with intermediate-dose cytarabine (FA regimen) versus high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC regimen) as consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who achieved complete remission. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) based on age (≥60, <60 years) and cytogenetics were evaluated from data between January 2005 and March 2013. Total 82 patients (FA, n = 45; HiDAC, n = 37; 14–65 years) were evaluated. Five-year DFS was 32.0% and 36.2% for FA and HiDAC groups, respectively (P = 0.729), and 5-year OS was 39.5% and 47.8% (P = 0.568), respectively. Among older patients (≥60 years), 3-year DFS was 26.0% for FA group and 12.5% for HiDAC group (P = 0.032), and 3-year OS was 34.6% and 12.5%, respectively (P = 0.026). In FA group, hematological toxicities were significantly lower. FA regimen was as effective as HiDAC regimen in patients with good/intermediate cytogenetics and significantly improved DFS and OS in older patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4602804/ /pubmed/25501050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000134 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
spellingShingle 4800
Zhang, Wenjun
Ding, Yi
Wu, Hao
Chen, Yuhua
Lu, Huina
Chen, Chunying
Fu, Jianfei
Wang, Weiguang
Liang, Aibin
Zou, Shanhua
Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_fullStr Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_short Retrospective Comparison of Fludarabine in Combination With Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Versus High-Dose Cytarabine As Consolidation Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_sort retrospective comparison of fludarabine in combination with intermediate-dose cytarabine versus high-dose cytarabine as consolidation therapies for acute myeloid leukemia
topic 4800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25501050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000134
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwenjun retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT dingyi retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT wuhao retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT chenyuhua retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT luhuina retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT chenchunying retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT fujianfei retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT wangweiguang retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT liangaibin retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT zoushanhua retrospectivecomparisonoffludarabineincombinationwithintermediatedosecytarabineversushighdosecytarabineasconsolidationtherapiesforacutemyeloidleukemia