Cargando…

Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Safety and Outcomes

Endoscopic resection has been performed to treat small gastric neoplasms. However, this technique for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remains controversial. This study aims to compare the safety and surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection of small gastric GISTs. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Chaoyong, Chen, Haining, Yin, Yuan, Chen, Jiaju, Han, Luyin, Zhang, Bo, Chen, Zhixin, Chen, Jiaping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25569663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000376
_version_ 1782394803050250240
author Shen, Chaoyong
Chen, Haining
Yin, Yuan
Chen, Jiaju
Han, Luyin
Zhang, Bo
Chen, Zhixin
Chen, Jiaping
author_facet Shen, Chaoyong
Chen, Haining
Yin, Yuan
Chen, Jiaju
Han, Luyin
Zhang, Bo
Chen, Zhixin
Chen, Jiaping
author_sort Shen, Chaoyong
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic resection has been performed to treat small gastric neoplasms. However, this technique for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remains controversial. This study aims to compare the safety and surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection of small gastric GISTs. The medical records of 54 consecutive gastric GISTs patients with tumor size of ≤2 cm, who were surgically treated with endoscopic resection (endoscopic group) or open surgery (laparotomy group) in a single institution from March 2010 to June 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical and tumor characteristics, surgical safety, and tumor-related outcomes were evaluated. Of 54 patients, 32 and 22 patients underwent endoscopic resection and laparotomy, respectively. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection yielded a significantly shorter hospital stay compared with patients who underwent laparotomy (P < 0.001). Compared with patients in the endoscopic group, patients in the laparotomy group had more intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), had longer nasogastric tube retention (P < 0.001), and required longer operative time (P < 0.001). More laparotomy patients required postoperative analgesic drugs than those in the endoscopic group (n = 9 vs 4; P = 0.016). Gastric perforation occurred in 1 case during operation in the endoscopic group. Patients who underwent these 2 procedures did not differ with respect to tumor size (P = 0.168), perioperative transfusion (P = 1.000), reoperation (P = 1.000), early satiety (P = 0.560), and postoperative bleeding (P = 1.000). With a median follow-up time of 34.5 months, 1 high-risk patient in each group experienced tumor recurrence/metastasis postoperatively. The endoscopic procedure allows safe resection with good surgical outcomes for small gastric GISTs compared with laparotomy. Moreover, larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm endoscopic application for small gastric GISTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4602836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46028362015-10-27 Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Safety and Outcomes Shen, Chaoyong Chen, Haining Yin, Yuan Chen, Jiaju Han, Luyin Zhang, Bo Chen, Zhixin Chen, Jiaping Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 Endoscopic resection has been performed to treat small gastric neoplasms. However, this technique for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remains controversial. This study aims to compare the safety and surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection of small gastric GISTs. The medical records of 54 consecutive gastric GISTs patients with tumor size of ≤2 cm, who were surgically treated with endoscopic resection (endoscopic group) or open surgery (laparotomy group) in a single institution from March 2010 to June 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical and tumor characteristics, surgical safety, and tumor-related outcomes were evaluated. Of 54 patients, 32 and 22 patients underwent endoscopic resection and laparotomy, respectively. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection yielded a significantly shorter hospital stay compared with patients who underwent laparotomy (P < 0.001). Compared with patients in the endoscopic group, patients in the laparotomy group had more intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), had longer nasogastric tube retention (P < 0.001), and required longer operative time (P < 0.001). More laparotomy patients required postoperative analgesic drugs than those in the endoscopic group (n = 9 vs 4; P = 0.016). Gastric perforation occurred in 1 case during operation in the endoscopic group. Patients who underwent these 2 procedures did not differ with respect to tumor size (P = 0.168), perioperative transfusion (P = 1.000), reoperation (P = 1.000), early satiety (P = 0.560), and postoperative bleeding (P = 1.000). With a median follow-up time of 34.5 months, 1 high-risk patient in each group experienced tumor recurrence/metastasis postoperatively. The endoscopic procedure allows safe resection with good surgical outcomes for small gastric GISTs compared with laparotomy. Moreover, larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm endoscopic application for small gastric GISTs. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4602836/ /pubmed/25569663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000376 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Shen, Chaoyong
Chen, Haining
Yin, Yuan
Chen, Jiaju
Han, Luyin
Zhang, Bo
Chen, Zhixin
Chen, Jiaping
Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Safety and Outcomes
title Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Safety and Outcomes
title_full Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Safety and Outcomes
title_fullStr Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Safety and Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Safety and Outcomes
title_short Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Safety and Outcomes
title_sort endoscopic versus open resection for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: safety and outcomes
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25569663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000376
work_keys_str_mv AT shenchaoyong endoscopicversusopenresectionforsmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorssafetyandoutcomes
AT chenhaining endoscopicversusopenresectionforsmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorssafetyandoutcomes
AT yinyuan endoscopicversusopenresectionforsmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorssafetyandoutcomes
AT chenjiaju endoscopicversusopenresectionforsmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorssafetyandoutcomes
AT hanluyin endoscopicversusopenresectionforsmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorssafetyandoutcomes
AT zhangbo endoscopicversusopenresectionforsmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorssafetyandoutcomes
AT chenzhixin endoscopicversusopenresectionforsmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorssafetyandoutcomes
AT chenjiaping endoscopicversusopenresectionforsmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorssafetyandoutcomes