Cargando…

Efficacy of Coblation Technology in Treating Cervical Discogenic Upper Back Pain

Upper back pain originating from the cervical disk itself is defined as cervical discogenic upper back pain. Coblation procedures can provide therapeutic effects for neck and radicular pain related to contained cervical disk herniation. However, no studies have reported the performance of coblation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Liangliang, Tang, Yuanzhang, Li, Xiuliang, Li, Na, Ni, Jiaxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25997062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000858
_version_ 1782394807591632896
author He, Liangliang
Tang, Yuanzhang
Li, Xiuliang
Li, Na
Ni, Jiaxiang
He, Liangliang
author_facet He, Liangliang
Tang, Yuanzhang
Li, Xiuliang
Li, Na
Ni, Jiaxiang
He, Liangliang
author_sort He, Liangliang
collection PubMed
description Upper back pain originating from the cervical disk itself is defined as cervical discogenic upper back pain. Coblation procedures can provide therapeutic effects for neck and radicular pain related to contained cervical disk herniation. However, no studies have reported the performance of coblation procedures, particularly for treating cervical discogenic upper back pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of coblation procedures in treating cervical discogenic upper back pain. In a prospective, clinical, observational study, 28 consecutive patients with discogenic upper back pain underwent coblation procedures on the cervical disk with a percutaneous anterior approach. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, patient responses stating significant (≥50%) pain relief, significant (≥50%) reduction in pain medicine intake and Modified MacNab criteria were adopted to evaluate the pain intensity, degree of pain relief, and functional status after 12 months of follow-up. The preoperative pain VAS score was 6.5 ± 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.085–6.915), and the pain VAS score significantly decreased to 2.4 ± 1.3 (95% CI 1.929–2.928), 2.5 ± 1.5 (95% CI 1.963–3.109), 2.7 ± 1.4 (95% CI 2.157–3.271), 3.1 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.457–3.686), and 3.1 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.471–3.743) at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively (P < 0.05). Twenty-two (78.6%), 21 (75.0%), 20 (71.4%), 19 (67.9%), and 18 (64.3%) of the patients expressed significant pain relief at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. 24 (85.7%), 23 (82.1%), 23 (82.1%), and 22 (78.6%) reported significant reduction in pain medication intake at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. According to the Modified MacNab criteria, the numbers of patients with “excellent” or “good” ratings were 22 (78.6%), 21 (75.0%), 20 (71.4%), and 18 (64.3%) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. No serious complications were observed. The findings of this study showed that coblation is an effective, safe, minimally invasive, and less uncomfortable procedure for the treatment of discogenic upper back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4602856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46028562015-10-27 Efficacy of Coblation Technology in Treating Cervical Discogenic Upper Back Pain He, Liangliang Tang, Yuanzhang Li, Xiuliang Li, Na Ni, Jiaxiang He, Liangliang Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Upper back pain originating from the cervical disk itself is defined as cervical discogenic upper back pain. Coblation procedures can provide therapeutic effects for neck and radicular pain related to contained cervical disk herniation. However, no studies have reported the performance of coblation procedures, particularly for treating cervical discogenic upper back pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of coblation procedures in treating cervical discogenic upper back pain. In a prospective, clinical, observational study, 28 consecutive patients with discogenic upper back pain underwent coblation procedures on the cervical disk with a percutaneous anterior approach. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, patient responses stating significant (≥50%) pain relief, significant (≥50%) reduction in pain medicine intake and Modified MacNab criteria were adopted to evaluate the pain intensity, degree of pain relief, and functional status after 12 months of follow-up. The preoperative pain VAS score was 6.5 ± 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.085–6.915), and the pain VAS score significantly decreased to 2.4 ± 1.3 (95% CI 1.929–2.928), 2.5 ± 1.5 (95% CI 1.963–3.109), 2.7 ± 1.4 (95% CI 2.157–3.271), 3.1 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.457–3.686), and 3.1 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.471–3.743) at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively (P < 0.05). Twenty-two (78.6%), 21 (75.0%), 20 (71.4%), 19 (67.9%), and 18 (64.3%) of the patients expressed significant pain relief at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. 24 (85.7%), 23 (82.1%), 23 (82.1%), and 22 (78.6%) reported significant reduction in pain medication intake at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. According to the Modified MacNab criteria, the numbers of patients with “excellent” or “good” ratings were 22 (78.6%), 21 (75.0%), 20 (71.4%), and 18 (64.3%) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. No serious complications were observed. The findings of this study showed that coblation is an effective, safe, minimally invasive, and less uncomfortable procedure for the treatment of discogenic upper back pain. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4602856/ /pubmed/25997062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000858 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
He, Liangliang
Tang, Yuanzhang
Li, Xiuliang
Li, Na
Ni, Jiaxiang
He, Liangliang
Efficacy of Coblation Technology in Treating Cervical Discogenic Upper Back Pain
title Efficacy of Coblation Technology in Treating Cervical Discogenic Upper Back Pain
title_full Efficacy of Coblation Technology in Treating Cervical Discogenic Upper Back Pain
title_fullStr Efficacy of Coblation Technology in Treating Cervical Discogenic Upper Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Coblation Technology in Treating Cervical Discogenic Upper Back Pain
title_short Efficacy of Coblation Technology in Treating Cervical Discogenic Upper Back Pain
title_sort efficacy of coblation technology in treating cervical discogenic upper back pain
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25997062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000858
work_keys_str_mv AT heliangliang efficacyofcoblationtechnologyintreatingcervicaldiscogenicupperbackpain
AT tangyuanzhang efficacyofcoblationtechnologyintreatingcervicaldiscogenicupperbackpain
AT lixiuliang efficacyofcoblationtechnologyintreatingcervicaldiscogenicupperbackpain
AT lina efficacyofcoblationtechnologyintreatingcervicaldiscogenicupperbackpain
AT nijiaxiang efficacyofcoblationtechnologyintreatingcervicaldiscogenicupperbackpain
AT heliangliang efficacyofcoblationtechnologyintreatingcervicaldiscogenicupperbackpain