Cargando…

Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Many meta-analyses have confirmed the technical feasibility and favorable short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer patients, but the long-term survival outcome of LG remains controversial compared with open gastrectomy (OG). This study aimed to compare the 5-y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xin-Zu, Wen, Lei, Rui, Yuan-Yi, Liu, Chao-Xu, Zhao, Qing-Chuan, Zhou, Zong-Guang, Hu, Jian-Kun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25634185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000454
_version_ 1782394832160817152
author Chen, Xin-Zu
Wen, Lei
Rui, Yuan-Yi
Liu, Chao-Xu
Zhao, Qing-Chuan
Zhou, Zong-Guang
Hu, Jian-Kun
author_facet Chen, Xin-Zu
Wen, Lei
Rui, Yuan-Yi
Liu, Chao-Xu
Zhao, Qing-Chuan
Zhou, Zong-Guang
Hu, Jian-Kun
author_sort Chen, Xin-Zu
collection PubMed
description Many meta-analyses have confirmed the technical feasibility and favorable short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer patients, but the long-term survival outcome of LG remains controversial compared with open gastrectomy (OG). This study aimed to compare the 5-year overall survival (OS), recurrence, and gastric cancer–related death of LG with OG among gastric cancer patients. PubMed was searched to February 2014. The resectable gastric cancer patients who underwent curative LG or OG were eligible. The studies that compared 5-year OS, recurrence, or gastric cancer–related death in the LG and OG groups were included. A meta-analysis, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and stage-specific analysis were performed to estimate the survival outcome between the two groups and identify the potential confounders. Quality assessment was based on a tailored comparability scoring system. Twenty-three studies with 7336 patients were included. The score of comparability between two groups and the extent of lymphadenectomy were two independent confounders. Based on the well-balanced studies, the 5-year OS (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.90–1.28, P = 0.45), recurrence (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68–1.02, P = 0.08), and gastric cancer–related death (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.65–1.13, P = 0.28) rates were comparable in LG and OG. Several subsets such as the publication year, study region, sample size, gastrectomy pattern, extent of lymphadenectomy, number of nodes harvested, and proportion of T1–2 or N0–1 did not influence the estimates, if they were well balanced. Particularly, the stage-specific estimates obtained comparable results between the two groups. Randomized controlled trials comparing LG with OG remain sparse to assess their long-term survival outcomes. The major contributions of this systematic review compared with other meta-analyses are a comprehensive collection of available long-term survival outcomes within a much larger number of observations and a more precise consideration of confounders. Current knowledge indicates that the long-term survival outcome of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery is comparable to that of open surgery among early or advanced stage gastric cancer patients, and LG is acceptable with regard to oncologic safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4602964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46029642015-10-27 Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Chen, Xin-Zu Wen, Lei Rui, Yuan-Yi Liu, Chao-Xu Zhao, Qing-Chuan Zhou, Zong-Guang Hu, Jian-Kun Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Many meta-analyses have confirmed the technical feasibility and favorable short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer patients, but the long-term survival outcome of LG remains controversial compared with open gastrectomy (OG). This study aimed to compare the 5-year overall survival (OS), recurrence, and gastric cancer–related death of LG with OG among gastric cancer patients. PubMed was searched to February 2014. The resectable gastric cancer patients who underwent curative LG or OG were eligible. The studies that compared 5-year OS, recurrence, or gastric cancer–related death in the LG and OG groups were included. A meta-analysis, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and stage-specific analysis were performed to estimate the survival outcome between the two groups and identify the potential confounders. Quality assessment was based on a tailored comparability scoring system. Twenty-three studies with 7336 patients were included. The score of comparability between two groups and the extent of lymphadenectomy were two independent confounders. Based on the well-balanced studies, the 5-year OS (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.90–1.28, P = 0.45), recurrence (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68–1.02, P = 0.08), and gastric cancer–related death (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.65–1.13, P = 0.28) rates were comparable in LG and OG. Several subsets such as the publication year, study region, sample size, gastrectomy pattern, extent of lymphadenectomy, number of nodes harvested, and proportion of T1–2 or N0–1 did not influence the estimates, if they were well balanced. Particularly, the stage-specific estimates obtained comparable results between the two groups. Randomized controlled trials comparing LG with OG remain sparse to assess their long-term survival outcomes. The major contributions of this systematic review compared with other meta-analyses are a comprehensive collection of available long-term survival outcomes within a much larger number of observations and a more precise consideration of confounders. Current knowledge indicates that the long-term survival outcome of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery is comparable to that of open surgery among early or advanced stage gastric cancer patients, and LG is acceptable with regard to oncologic safety. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4602964/ /pubmed/25634185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000454 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Chen, Xin-Zu
Wen, Lei
Rui, Yuan-Yi
Liu, Chao-Xu
Zhao, Qing-Chuan
Zhou, Zong-Guang
Hu, Jian-Kun
Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25634185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000454
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxinzu longtermsurvivaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wenlei longtermsurvivaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ruiyuanyi longtermsurvivaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuchaoxu longtermsurvivaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoqingchuan longtermsurvivaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouzongguang longtermsurvivaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hujiankun longtermsurvivaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopengastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis