Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation to antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jing-Tao, Chen, Ke-Ping, Zhang, Shu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25634169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000409
_version_ 1782394834220220416
author Zhang, Jing-Tao
Chen, Ke-Ping
Zhang, Shu
author_facet Zhang, Jing-Tao
Chen, Ke-Ping
Zhang, Shu
author_sort Zhang, Jing-Tao
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation to antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies published through May 31, 2014. Randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulants (warfarin) and antiplatelet therapy in patients with AF were included. The primary outcomes were the rates of stroke and systemic embolism. Secondary outcomes included the rates of hemorrhage/major bleeding and death. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Nine reports of 8 trials that enrolled 4363 patients (2169 patients received anticoagulation and 2194 antiplatelet therapy) were included. All of the studies compared adjusted-dose warfarin or with aspirin, and the majority of the patients were >70 years of age. Anticoagulants were titrated to an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 4.5, and aspirin was administered at a dosage of 75 to 325 mg/d. Death occurred in 206 participants treated with an anticoagulant and 229 participants treated with antiplatelet therapy. There was no significant difference in the overall stroke rate between the groups (OR = 0.667, 95% CI 0.426–1.045, P = 0.08); however, patients with nonrheumatic AF (NRAF) treated with an anticoagulant had a lower risk of stroke (OR = 0.557, 95% CI 0.411–0.753, P < 0.001). Anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of embolism (OR = 0.616, 95% CI = 0.392–0.966, P = 0.04), and this finding persisted in patients with NRAF (OR = 0.581, 95% CI 0.359–0.941, P = 0.03). No significant difference in the rate of hemorrhage/major bleeding was noted (OR = 1.497, 95% CI 0.730–3.070, P = 0.27), and this finding persisted on subgroup analysis. Anticoagulants appear to be more effective than aspirin in preventing embolisms in patients with AF, as the risk of bleeding is not increased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4602973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46029732015-10-27 Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis Zhang, Jing-Tao Chen, Ke-Ping Zhang, Shu Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation to antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies published through May 31, 2014. Randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulants (warfarin) and antiplatelet therapy in patients with AF were included. The primary outcomes were the rates of stroke and systemic embolism. Secondary outcomes included the rates of hemorrhage/major bleeding and death. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Nine reports of 8 trials that enrolled 4363 patients (2169 patients received anticoagulation and 2194 antiplatelet therapy) were included. All of the studies compared adjusted-dose warfarin or with aspirin, and the majority of the patients were >70 years of age. Anticoagulants were titrated to an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 4.5, and aspirin was administered at a dosage of 75 to 325 mg/d. Death occurred in 206 participants treated with an anticoagulant and 229 participants treated with antiplatelet therapy. There was no significant difference in the overall stroke rate between the groups (OR = 0.667, 95% CI 0.426–1.045, P = 0.08); however, patients with nonrheumatic AF (NRAF) treated with an anticoagulant had a lower risk of stroke (OR = 0.557, 95% CI 0.411–0.753, P < 0.001). Anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of embolism (OR = 0.616, 95% CI = 0.392–0.966, P = 0.04), and this finding persisted in patients with NRAF (OR = 0.581, 95% CI 0.359–0.941, P = 0.03). No significant difference in the rate of hemorrhage/major bleeding was noted (OR = 1.497, 95% CI 0.730–3.070, P = 0.27), and this finding persisted on subgroup analysis. Anticoagulants appear to be more effective than aspirin in preventing embolisms in patients with AF, as the risk of bleeding is not increased. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4602973/ /pubmed/25634169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000409 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 3400
Zhang, Jing-Tao
Chen, Ke-Ping
Zhang, Shu
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants versus aspirin for patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
topic 3400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4602973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25634169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000409
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjingtao efficacyandsafetyoforalanticoagulantsversusaspirinforpatientswithatrialfibrillationametaanalysis
AT chenkeping efficacyandsafetyoforalanticoagulantsversusaspirinforpatientswithatrialfibrillationametaanalysis
AT zhangshu efficacyandsafetyoforalanticoagulantsversusaspirinforpatientswithatrialfibrillationametaanalysis