Cargando…
Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin**
The five B-subunits (CTB(5)) of the Vibrio cholerae (cholera) toxin can bind to the intestinal cell surface so the entire AB(5) toxin can enter the cell. Simultaneous binding can occur on more than one of the monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) units present on the cell surface. Such simultaneous...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201500006 |
_version_ | 1782394911237079040 |
---|---|
author | Fu, Ou Pukin, Aliaksei V van Ufford, H C Quarles Branson, Thomas R Thies-Weesie, Dominique M E Turnbull, W Bruce Visser, Gerben M Pieters, Roland J |
author_facet | Fu, Ou Pukin, Aliaksei V van Ufford, H C Quarles Branson, Thomas R Thies-Weesie, Dominique M E Turnbull, W Bruce Visser, Gerben M Pieters, Roland J |
author_sort | Fu, Ou |
collection | PubMed |
description | The five B-subunits (CTB(5)) of the Vibrio cholerae (cholera) toxin can bind to the intestinal cell surface so the entire AB(5) toxin can enter the cell. Simultaneous binding can occur on more than one of the monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) units present on the cell surface. Such simultaneous binding arising from the toxins multivalency is believed to enhance its affinity. Thus, blocking the initial attachment of the toxin to the cell surface using inhibitors with GM1 subunits has the potential to stop the disease. Previously we showed that tetravalent GM1 molecules were sub-nanomolar inhibitors of CTB(5). In this study, we synthesized a pentavalent version and compared the binding and potency of penta- and tetravalent cholera toxin inhibitors, based on the same scaffold, for the first time. The pentavalent geometry did not yield major benefits over the tetravalent species, but it was still a strong inhibitor, and no major steric clashes occurred when binding the toxin. Thus, systems which can adopt more geometries, such as those described here, can be equally potent, and this may possibly be due to their ability to form higher-order structures or simply due to more statistical options for binding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4603408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46034082015-10-16 Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin** Fu, Ou Pukin, Aliaksei V van Ufford, H C Quarles Branson, Thomas R Thies-Weesie, Dominique M E Turnbull, W Bruce Visser, Gerben M Pieters, Roland J ChemistryOpen Full Papers The five B-subunits (CTB(5)) of the Vibrio cholerae (cholera) toxin can bind to the intestinal cell surface so the entire AB(5) toxin can enter the cell. Simultaneous binding can occur on more than one of the monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) units present on the cell surface. Such simultaneous binding arising from the toxins multivalency is believed to enhance its affinity. Thus, blocking the initial attachment of the toxin to the cell surface using inhibitors with GM1 subunits has the potential to stop the disease. Previously we showed that tetravalent GM1 molecules were sub-nanomolar inhibitors of CTB(5). In this study, we synthesized a pentavalent version and compared the binding and potency of penta- and tetravalent cholera toxin inhibitors, based on the same scaffold, for the first time. The pentavalent geometry did not yield major benefits over the tetravalent species, but it was still a strong inhibitor, and no major steric clashes occurred when binding the toxin. Thus, systems which can adopt more geometries, such as those described here, can be equally potent, and this may possibly be due to their ability to form higher-order structures or simply due to more statistical options for binding. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-08 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4603408/ /pubmed/26478842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201500006 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers Fu, Ou Pukin, Aliaksei V van Ufford, H C Quarles Branson, Thomas R Thies-Weesie, Dominique M E Turnbull, W Bruce Visser, Gerben M Pieters, Roland J Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin** |
title | Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin** |
title_full | Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin** |
title_fullStr | Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin** |
title_full_unstemmed | Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin** |
title_short | Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin** |
title_sort | tetra- versus pentavalent inhibitors of cholera toxin** |
topic | Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201500006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuou tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin AT pukinaliakseiv tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin AT vanuffordhcquarles tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin AT bransonthomasr tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin AT thiesweesiedominiqueme tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin AT turnbullwbruce tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin AT vissergerbenm tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin AT pietersrolandj tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin |