Cargando…

Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin**

The five B-subunits (CTB(5)) of the Vibrio cholerae (cholera) toxin can bind to the intestinal cell surface so the entire AB(5) toxin can enter the cell. Simultaneous binding can occur on more than one of the monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) units present on the cell surface. Such simultaneous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Ou, Pukin, Aliaksei V, van Ufford, H C Quarles, Branson, Thomas R, Thies-Weesie, Dominique M E, Turnbull, W Bruce, Visser, Gerben M, Pieters, Roland J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201500006
_version_ 1782394911237079040
author Fu, Ou
Pukin, Aliaksei V
van Ufford, H C Quarles
Branson, Thomas R
Thies-Weesie, Dominique M E
Turnbull, W Bruce
Visser, Gerben M
Pieters, Roland J
author_facet Fu, Ou
Pukin, Aliaksei V
van Ufford, H C Quarles
Branson, Thomas R
Thies-Weesie, Dominique M E
Turnbull, W Bruce
Visser, Gerben M
Pieters, Roland J
author_sort Fu, Ou
collection PubMed
description The five B-subunits (CTB(5)) of the Vibrio cholerae (cholera) toxin can bind to the intestinal cell surface so the entire AB(5) toxin can enter the cell. Simultaneous binding can occur on more than one of the monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) units present on the cell surface. Such simultaneous binding arising from the toxins multivalency is believed to enhance its affinity. Thus, blocking the initial attachment of the toxin to the cell surface using inhibitors with GM1 subunits has the potential to stop the disease. Previously we showed that tetravalent GM1 molecules were sub-nanomolar inhibitors of CTB(5). In this study, we synthesized a pentavalent version and compared the binding and potency of penta- and tetravalent cholera toxin inhibitors, based on the same scaffold, for the first time. The pentavalent geometry did not yield major benefits over the tetravalent species, but it was still a strong inhibitor, and no major steric clashes occurred when binding the toxin. Thus, systems which can adopt more geometries, such as those described here, can be equally potent, and this may possibly be due to their ability to form higher-order structures or simply due to more statistical options for binding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4603408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46034082015-10-16 Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin** Fu, Ou Pukin, Aliaksei V van Ufford, H C Quarles Branson, Thomas R Thies-Weesie, Dominique M E Turnbull, W Bruce Visser, Gerben M Pieters, Roland J ChemistryOpen Full Papers The five B-subunits (CTB(5)) of the Vibrio cholerae (cholera) toxin can bind to the intestinal cell surface so the entire AB(5) toxin can enter the cell. Simultaneous binding can occur on more than one of the monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) units present on the cell surface. Such simultaneous binding arising from the toxins multivalency is believed to enhance its affinity. Thus, blocking the initial attachment of the toxin to the cell surface using inhibitors with GM1 subunits has the potential to stop the disease. Previously we showed that tetravalent GM1 molecules were sub-nanomolar inhibitors of CTB(5). In this study, we synthesized a pentavalent version and compared the binding and potency of penta- and tetravalent cholera toxin inhibitors, based on the same scaffold, for the first time. The pentavalent geometry did not yield major benefits over the tetravalent species, but it was still a strong inhibitor, and no major steric clashes occurred when binding the toxin. Thus, systems which can adopt more geometries, such as those described here, can be equally potent, and this may possibly be due to their ability to form higher-order structures or simply due to more statistical options for binding. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-08 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4603408/ /pubmed/26478842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201500006 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Fu, Ou
Pukin, Aliaksei V
van Ufford, H C Quarles
Branson, Thomas R
Thies-Weesie, Dominique M E
Turnbull, W Bruce
Visser, Gerben M
Pieters, Roland J
Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin**
title Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin**
title_full Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin**
title_fullStr Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin**
title_full_unstemmed Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin**
title_short Tetra- versus Pentavalent Inhibitors of Cholera Toxin**
title_sort tetra- versus pentavalent inhibitors of cholera toxin**
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.201500006
work_keys_str_mv AT fuou tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin
AT pukinaliakseiv tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin
AT vanuffordhcquarles tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin
AT bransonthomasr tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin
AT thiesweesiedominiqueme tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin
AT turnbullwbruce tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin
AT vissergerbenm tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin
AT pietersrolandj tetraversuspentavalentinhibitorsofcholeratoxin