Cargando…

Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread availability of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) in various healthcare settings, evidence on their uptake and effectiveness is still limited. Most barrier studies focus on CDSSs that are aimed at a limited number of decision points within selected smal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lugtenberg, Marjolein, Weenink, Jan-Willem, van der Weijden, Trudy, Westert, Gert P., Kool, Rudolf B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26459233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0205-z
_version_ 1782394946906488832
author Lugtenberg, Marjolein
Weenink, Jan-Willem
van der Weijden, Trudy
Westert, Gert P.
Kool, Rudolf B.
author_facet Lugtenberg, Marjolein
Weenink, Jan-Willem
van der Weijden, Trudy
Westert, Gert P.
Kool, Rudolf B.
author_sort Lugtenberg, Marjolein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread availability of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) in various healthcare settings, evidence on their uptake and effectiveness is still limited. Most barrier studies focus on CDSSs that are aimed at a limited number of decision points within selected small-scale academic settings. The aim of this study was to identify the perceived barriers to using large-scale implemented CDSSs covering multiple disease areas in primary care. METHODS: Three focus group sessions were conducted in which 24 primary care practitioners (PCPs) participated (general practitioners, general practitioners in training and practice nurses), varying from 7 to 9 per session. In each focus group, barriers to using CDSSs were discussed using a semi-structured literature-based topic list. Focus group discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers independently performed thematic content analysis using the software program Atlas.ti 7.0. RESULTS: Three groups of barriers emerged, related to 1) the users’ knowledge of the system, 2) the users’ evaluation of features of the system (source and content, format/lay out, and functionality), and 3) the interaction of the system with external factors (patient-related and environmental factors). Commonly perceived barriers were insufficient knowledge of the CDSS, irrelevant alerts, too high intensity of alerts, a lack of flexibility and learning capacity of the CDSS, a negative effect on patient communication, and the additional time and work it requires to use the CDSS. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple types of barriers may hinder the use of large-scale implemented CDSSs covering multiple disease areas in primary care. Lack of knowledge of the system is an important barrier, emphasizing the importance of a proper introduction of the system to the target group. Furthermore, barriers related to a lack of integration into daily practice seem to be of primary concern, suggesting that increasing the system’s flexibility and learning capacity in order to be able to adapt the decision support to meet the varying needs of different users should be the main target of CDSS interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4603732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46037322015-10-14 Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers Lugtenberg, Marjolein Weenink, Jan-Willem van der Weijden, Trudy Westert, Gert P. Kool, Rudolf B. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread availability of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) in various healthcare settings, evidence on their uptake and effectiveness is still limited. Most barrier studies focus on CDSSs that are aimed at a limited number of decision points within selected small-scale academic settings. The aim of this study was to identify the perceived barriers to using large-scale implemented CDSSs covering multiple disease areas in primary care. METHODS: Three focus group sessions were conducted in which 24 primary care practitioners (PCPs) participated (general practitioners, general practitioners in training and practice nurses), varying from 7 to 9 per session. In each focus group, barriers to using CDSSs were discussed using a semi-structured literature-based topic list. Focus group discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers independently performed thematic content analysis using the software program Atlas.ti 7.0. RESULTS: Three groups of barriers emerged, related to 1) the users’ knowledge of the system, 2) the users’ evaluation of features of the system (source and content, format/lay out, and functionality), and 3) the interaction of the system with external factors (patient-related and environmental factors). Commonly perceived barriers were insufficient knowledge of the CDSS, irrelevant alerts, too high intensity of alerts, a lack of flexibility and learning capacity of the CDSS, a negative effect on patient communication, and the additional time and work it requires to use the CDSS. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple types of barriers may hinder the use of large-scale implemented CDSSs covering multiple disease areas in primary care. Lack of knowledge of the system is an important barrier, emphasizing the importance of a proper introduction of the system to the target group. Furthermore, barriers related to a lack of integration into daily practice seem to be of primary concern, suggesting that increasing the system’s flexibility and learning capacity in order to be able to adapt the decision support to meet the varying needs of different users should be the main target of CDSS interventions. BioMed Central 2015-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4603732/ /pubmed/26459233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0205-z Text en © Lugtenberg et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lugtenberg, Marjolein
Weenink, Jan-Willem
van der Weijden, Trudy
Westert, Gert P.
Kool, Rudolf B.
Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers
title Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers
title_full Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers
title_fullStr Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers
title_short Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers
title_sort implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26459233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0205-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lugtenbergmarjolein implementationofmultipledomaincoveringcomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudyonperceivedbarriers
AT weeninkjanwillem implementationofmultipledomaincoveringcomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudyonperceivedbarriers
AT vanderweijdentrudy implementationofmultipledomaincoveringcomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudyonperceivedbarriers
AT westertgertp implementationofmultipledomaincoveringcomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudyonperceivedbarriers
AT koolrudolfb implementationofmultipledomaincoveringcomputerizeddecisionsupportsystemsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudyonperceivedbarriers