Cargando…

Using an Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescent Assay to Determine Effective Antibiotic Combinations against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram Negative Bacteria within 24 Hours

BACKGROUND: Current in vitro combination testing methods involve enumeration by bacterial plating, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Measurement of bioluminescence, released when bacterial adenosine triphosphate binds to firefly luciferin-luciferase, has been proposed as a surrogate for b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Yiying, Leck, Hui, Lim, Tze Peng, Teo, Jocelyn, Lee, Winnie, Hsu, Li Yang, Koh, Tse Hsien, Tan, Thuan Tong, Tan, Thean-Yen, Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26460891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140446
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Current in vitro combination testing methods involve enumeration by bacterial plating, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Measurement of bioluminescence, released when bacterial adenosine triphosphate binds to firefly luciferin-luciferase, has been proposed as a surrogate for bacterial counts. We developed an ATP bioluminescent combination testing assay with a rapid turnaround time of 24h to determine effective antibiotic combinations. METHODS: 100 strains of carbapenem-resistant (CR) GNB [30 Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), 30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) and 40 Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP)] were used. Bacterial suspensions (10(5) CFU/ml) were added to 96-well plates containing clinically achievable concentrations of multiple single and two-antibiotic combinations. At 24h, the luminescence intensity of each well was measured. Receiver operator characteristic curves were plotted to determine optimal luminescence threshold (T(RLU)) to discriminate between inhibitory/non-inhibitory combinations when compared to viable plating. The unweighted accuracy (UA) [(sensitivity + specificity)/2] of T(RLU) values was determined. External validation was further done using 50 additional CR-GNB. RESULTS: Predictive accuracies of T(RLU) were high for when all antibiotic combinations and species were collectively analyzed (T(RLU) = 0.81, UA = 89%). When individual thresholds for each species were determined, UA remained high. Predictive accuracy was highest for KP (T(RLU) = 0.81, UA = 91%), and lowest for AB (T(RLU) = 0.83, UA = 87%). Upon external validation, high overall accuracy (91%) was observed. The assay distinguished inhibitory/non-inhibitory combinations with UA of 80%, 94% and 93% for AB, PA and KP respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed an assay that is robust at identifying useful combinations with a rapid turn-around time of 24h, and may be employed to guide the timely selection of effective antibiotic combinations.