Cargando…

Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) typically manage early chronic kidney disease (CKD), but recent guidelines recommend nephrology co-management for some patients with stage 3 CKD and all patients with stage 4 CKD. We sought to compare quality of care for co-managed patients to solo managed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samal, Lipika, Wright, Adam, Waikar, Sushrut S., Linder, Jeffrey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26458541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0154-x
_version_ 1782394964614840320
author Samal, Lipika
Wright, Adam
Waikar, Sushrut S.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
author_facet Samal, Lipika
Wright, Adam
Waikar, Sushrut S.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
author_sort Samal, Lipika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) typically manage early chronic kidney disease (CKD), but recent guidelines recommend nephrology co-management for some patients with stage 3 CKD and all patients with stage 4 CKD. We sought to compare quality of care for co-managed patients to solo managed patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Patients included in the study were adults who visited a PCP during 2009 with laboratory evidence of CKD in the preceding two years, defined as two estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) between 15–59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) separated by 90 days. We assessed process measures (serum eGFR test, urine protein/albumin test, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker [ACE/ARB] prescription, and several tests monitoring for complications) and intermediate clinical outcomes (mean blood pressure and blood pressure control) and performed subgroup analyses by CKD stage. RESULTS: Of 3118 patients, 11 % were co-managed by a nephrologist. Co-management was associated with younger age (69 vs. 74 years), male gender (46 % vs. 34 %), minority race/ethnicity (black 32 % vs. 22 %; Hispanic 13 % vs. 8 %), hypertension (75 % vs. 66 %), diabetes (42 % vs. 26 %), and more PCP visits (5.0 vs. 3.9; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). After adjustment, co-management was associated with serum eGFR test (98 % vs. 94 %, p = <0.0001), urine protein/albumin test (82 % vs 36 %, p < 0.0001), and ACE/ARB prescription (77 % vs. 69 %, p = 0.03). Co-management was associated with monitoring for anemia and metabolic bone disease, but was not associated with lipid monitoring, differences in mean blood pressure (133/69 mmHg vs. 131/70 mmHg, p > 0.50) or blood pressure control. A subgroup analysis of Stage 4 CKD patients did not show a significant association between co-management and ACE/ARB prescription (80 % vs. 73 %, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: For stage 3 and 4 CKD patients, nephrology co-management was associated with increased stage-appropriate monitoring and ACE/ARB prescribing, but not improved blood pressure control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4603818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46038182015-10-14 Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis Samal, Lipika Wright, Adam Waikar, Sushrut S. Linder, Jeffrey A. BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) typically manage early chronic kidney disease (CKD), but recent guidelines recommend nephrology co-management for some patients with stage 3 CKD and all patients with stage 4 CKD. We sought to compare quality of care for co-managed patients to solo managed patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Patients included in the study were adults who visited a PCP during 2009 with laboratory evidence of CKD in the preceding two years, defined as two estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) between 15–59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) separated by 90 days. We assessed process measures (serum eGFR test, urine protein/albumin test, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker [ACE/ARB] prescription, and several tests monitoring for complications) and intermediate clinical outcomes (mean blood pressure and blood pressure control) and performed subgroup analyses by CKD stage. RESULTS: Of 3118 patients, 11 % were co-managed by a nephrologist. Co-management was associated with younger age (69 vs. 74 years), male gender (46 % vs. 34 %), minority race/ethnicity (black 32 % vs. 22 %; Hispanic 13 % vs. 8 %), hypertension (75 % vs. 66 %), diabetes (42 % vs. 26 %), and more PCP visits (5.0 vs. 3.9; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). After adjustment, co-management was associated with serum eGFR test (98 % vs. 94 %, p = <0.0001), urine protein/albumin test (82 % vs 36 %, p < 0.0001), and ACE/ARB prescription (77 % vs. 69 %, p = 0.03). Co-management was associated with monitoring for anemia and metabolic bone disease, but was not associated with lipid monitoring, differences in mean blood pressure (133/69 mmHg vs. 131/70 mmHg, p > 0.50) or blood pressure control. A subgroup analysis of Stage 4 CKD patients did not show a significant association between co-management and ACE/ARB prescription (80 % vs. 73 %, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: For stage 3 and 4 CKD patients, nephrology co-management was associated with increased stage-appropriate monitoring and ACE/ARB prescribing, but not improved blood pressure control. BioMed Central 2015-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4603818/ /pubmed/26458541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0154-x Text en © Samal et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Samal, Lipika
Wright, Adam
Waikar, Sushrut S.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis
title Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis
title_full Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis
title_fullStr Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis
title_short Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis
title_sort nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26458541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0154-x
work_keys_str_mv AT samallipika nephrologycomanagementversusprimarycaresolomanagementforearlychronickidneydiseasearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysis
AT wrightadam nephrologycomanagementversusprimarycaresolomanagementforearlychronickidneydiseasearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysis
AT waikarsushruts nephrologycomanagementversusprimarycaresolomanagementforearlychronickidneydiseasearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysis
AT linderjeffreya nephrologycomanagementversusprimarycaresolomanagementforearlychronickidneydiseasearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysis