Cargando…
Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis
BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) typically manage early chronic kidney disease (CKD), but recent guidelines recommend nephrology co-management for some patients with stage 3 CKD and all patients with stage 4 CKD. We sought to compare quality of care for co-managed patients to solo managed...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26458541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0154-x |
_version_ | 1782394964614840320 |
---|---|
author | Samal, Lipika Wright, Adam Waikar, Sushrut S. Linder, Jeffrey A. |
author_facet | Samal, Lipika Wright, Adam Waikar, Sushrut S. Linder, Jeffrey A. |
author_sort | Samal, Lipika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) typically manage early chronic kidney disease (CKD), but recent guidelines recommend nephrology co-management for some patients with stage 3 CKD and all patients with stage 4 CKD. We sought to compare quality of care for co-managed patients to solo managed patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Patients included in the study were adults who visited a PCP during 2009 with laboratory evidence of CKD in the preceding two years, defined as two estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) between 15–59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) separated by 90 days. We assessed process measures (serum eGFR test, urine protein/albumin test, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker [ACE/ARB] prescription, and several tests monitoring for complications) and intermediate clinical outcomes (mean blood pressure and blood pressure control) and performed subgroup analyses by CKD stage. RESULTS: Of 3118 patients, 11 % were co-managed by a nephrologist. Co-management was associated with younger age (69 vs. 74 years), male gender (46 % vs. 34 %), minority race/ethnicity (black 32 % vs. 22 %; Hispanic 13 % vs. 8 %), hypertension (75 % vs. 66 %), diabetes (42 % vs. 26 %), and more PCP visits (5.0 vs. 3.9; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). After adjustment, co-management was associated with serum eGFR test (98 % vs. 94 %, p = <0.0001), urine protein/albumin test (82 % vs 36 %, p < 0.0001), and ACE/ARB prescription (77 % vs. 69 %, p = 0.03). Co-management was associated with monitoring for anemia and metabolic bone disease, but was not associated with lipid monitoring, differences in mean blood pressure (133/69 mmHg vs. 131/70 mmHg, p > 0.50) or blood pressure control. A subgroup analysis of Stage 4 CKD patients did not show a significant association between co-management and ACE/ARB prescription (80 % vs. 73 %, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: For stage 3 and 4 CKD patients, nephrology co-management was associated with increased stage-appropriate monitoring and ACE/ARB prescribing, but not improved blood pressure control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4603818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46038182015-10-14 Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis Samal, Lipika Wright, Adam Waikar, Sushrut S. Linder, Jeffrey A. BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) typically manage early chronic kidney disease (CKD), but recent guidelines recommend nephrology co-management for some patients with stage 3 CKD and all patients with stage 4 CKD. We sought to compare quality of care for co-managed patients to solo managed patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Patients included in the study were adults who visited a PCP during 2009 with laboratory evidence of CKD in the preceding two years, defined as two estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) between 15–59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) separated by 90 days. We assessed process measures (serum eGFR test, urine protein/albumin test, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker [ACE/ARB] prescription, and several tests monitoring for complications) and intermediate clinical outcomes (mean blood pressure and blood pressure control) and performed subgroup analyses by CKD stage. RESULTS: Of 3118 patients, 11 % were co-managed by a nephrologist. Co-management was associated with younger age (69 vs. 74 years), male gender (46 % vs. 34 %), minority race/ethnicity (black 32 % vs. 22 %; Hispanic 13 % vs. 8 %), hypertension (75 % vs. 66 %), diabetes (42 % vs. 26 %), and more PCP visits (5.0 vs. 3.9; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). After adjustment, co-management was associated with serum eGFR test (98 % vs. 94 %, p = <0.0001), urine protein/albumin test (82 % vs 36 %, p < 0.0001), and ACE/ARB prescription (77 % vs. 69 %, p = 0.03). Co-management was associated with monitoring for anemia and metabolic bone disease, but was not associated with lipid monitoring, differences in mean blood pressure (133/69 mmHg vs. 131/70 mmHg, p > 0.50) or blood pressure control. A subgroup analysis of Stage 4 CKD patients did not show a significant association between co-management and ACE/ARB prescription (80 % vs. 73 %, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: For stage 3 and 4 CKD patients, nephrology co-management was associated with increased stage-appropriate monitoring and ACE/ARB prescribing, but not improved blood pressure control. BioMed Central 2015-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4603818/ /pubmed/26458541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0154-x Text en © Samal et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Samal, Lipika Wright, Adam Waikar, Sushrut S. Linder, Jeffrey A. Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis |
title | Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis |
title_full | Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis |
title_fullStr | Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis |
title_short | Nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis |
title_sort | nephrology co-management versus primary care solo management for early chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26458541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0154-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samallipika nephrologycomanagementversusprimarycaresolomanagementforearlychronickidneydiseasearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysis AT wrightadam nephrologycomanagementversusprimarycaresolomanagementforearlychronickidneydiseasearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysis AT waikarsushruts nephrologycomanagementversusprimarycaresolomanagementforearlychronickidneydiseasearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysis AT linderjeffreya nephrologycomanagementversusprimarycaresolomanagementforearlychronickidneydiseasearetrospectivecrosssectionalanalysis |