Cargando…

Does patient’s sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians – a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Biological and sociocultural differences between men and women may play an important role in medical treatment. Little is known about the awareness of these differences among general practitioners (GPs) and if they consider such differences in their medical practice. The aim of this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loikas, Desirée, Karlsson, Linnéa, von Euler, Mia, Hallgren, Karin, Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin, Bastholm Rahmner, Pia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0351-5
_version_ 1782394978351185920
author Loikas, Desirée
Karlsson, Linnéa
von Euler, Mia
Hallgren, Karin
Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin
Bastholm Rahmner, Pia
author_facet Loikas, Desirée
Karlsson, Linnéa
von Euler, Mia
Hallgren, Karin
Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin
Bastholm Rahmner, Pia
author_sort Loikas, Desirée
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biological and sociocultural differences between men and women may play an important role in medical treatment. Little is known about the awareness of these differences among general practitioners (GPs) and if they consider such differences in their medical practice. The aim of this study was to explore GPs’ perception of sex and gender aspects in medical treatment. METHODS: We conducted five focus group discussions (FGDs) with 29 physicians (mainly GPs) in Sweden. A discussion guide with semi-structured questions was used. All FGDs were audio-recorded and transcribed word-by-word. Data were analysed through inductive thematic analysis with no predetermined categories. RESULTS: Three main categories emerged from the data. The first category emphasised GPs’ experiences of sex and gender differences in diagnosing and assessment of clinical findings. Medical treatment in men and women was central in the second category. The third category emphasised GPs’ knowledge of sex differences in drug therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The GPs stated they had little knowledge of sex and gender differences in drug treatment, but gave multiple examples of how the patient’s sex affects the choice of treatment. Sex and gender aspects were considered in diagnosing and in the treatment decision. However, once the decision to treat was made the choice of drug followed recommendations by local Drug and Therapeutics Committee, which were perceived to be evidence-based. In the analysis we found a gap between perceived and expressed knowledge of sex and gender differences in drug treatment indicating a need of education about this to be included in the curriculum in medical school and in basic and specialist training for physicians. Education could also be a tool to avoid stereotypical thinking about male and female patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4603906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46039062015-10-14 Does patient’s sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians – a qualitative study Loikas, Desirée Karlsson, Linnéa von Euler, Mia Hallgren, Karin Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin Bastholm Rahmner, Pia BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Biological and sociocultural differences between men and women may play an important role in medical treatment. Little is known about the awareness of these differences among general practitioners (GPs) and if they consider such differences in their medical practice. The aim of this study was to explore GPs’ perception of sex and gender aspects in medical treatment. METHODS: We conducted five focus group discussions (FGDs) with 29 physicians (mainly GPs) in Sweden. A discussion guide with semi-structured questions was used. All FGDs were audio-recorded and transcribed word-by-word. Data were analysed through inductive thematic analysis with no predetermined categories. RESULTS: Three main categories emerged from the data. The first category emphasised GPs’ experiences of sex and gender differences in diagnosing and assessment of clinical findings. Medical treatment in men and women was central in the second category. The third category emphasised GPs’ knowledge of sex differences in drug therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The GPs stated they had little knowledge of sex and gender differences in drug treatment, but gave multiple examples of how the patient’s sex affects the choice of treatment. Sex and gender aspects were considered in diagnosing and in the treatment decision. However, once the decision to treat was made the choice of drug followed recommendations by local Drug and Therapeutics Committee, which were perceived to be evidence-based. In the analysis we found a gap between perceived and expressed knowledge of sex and gender differences in drug treatment indicating a need of education about this to be included in the curriculum in medical school and in basic and specialist training for physicians. Education could also be a tool to avoid stereotypical thinking about male and female patients. BioMed Central 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4603906/ /pubmed/26462960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0351-5 Text en © Loikas et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Loikas, Desirée
Karlsson, Linnéa
von Euler, Mia
Hallgren, Karin
Schenck-Gustafsson, Karin
Bastholm Rahmner, Pia
Does patient’s sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians – a qualitative study
title Does patient’s sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians – a qualitative study
title_full Does patient’s sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians – a qualitative study
title_fullStr Does patient’s sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians – a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Does patient’s sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians – a qualitative study
title_short Does patient’s sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians – a qualitative study
title_sort does patient’s sex influence treatment in primary care? experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians – a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0351-5
work_keys_str_mv AT loikasdesiree doespatientssexinfluencetreatmentinprimarycareexperiencesandexpressedknowledgeamongphysiciansaqualitativestudy
AT karlssonlinnea doespatientssexinfluencetreatmentinprimarycareexperiencesandexpressedknowledgeamongphysiciansaqualitativestudy
AT voneulermia doespatientssexinfluencetreatmentinprimarycareexperiencesandexpressedknowledgeamongphysiciansaqualitativestudy
AT hallgrenkarin doespatientssexinfluencetreatmentinprimarycareexperiencesandexpressedknowledgeamongphysiciansaqualitativestudy
AT schenckgustafssonkarin doespatientssexinfluencetreatmentinprimarycareexperiencesandexpressedknowledgeamongphysiciansaqualitativestudy
AT bastholmrahmnerpia doespatientssexinfluencetreatmentinprimarycareexperiencesandexpressedknowledgeamongphysiciansaqualitativestudy