Cargando…

Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Social networks are important for mental health outcomes as they can mobilise resources and help individuals to cope with social stressors. Individuals with psychosis may have specific difficulties in establishing and maintaining social relationships which impacts on their well-being and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palumbo, Claudia, Volpe, Umberto, Matanov, Aleksandra, Priebe, Stefan, Giacco, Domenico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26459046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1528-7
_version_ 1782394980858331136
author Palumbo, Claudia
Volpe, Umberto
Matanov, Aleksandra
Priebe, Stefan
Giacco, Domenico
author_facet Palumbo, Claudia
Volpe, Umberto
Matanov, Aleksandra
Priebe, Stefan
Giacco, Domenico
author_sort Palumbo, Claudia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social networks are important for mental health outcomes as they can mobilise resources and help individuals to cope with social stressors. Individuals with psychosis may have specific difficulties in establishing and maintaining social relationships which impacts on their well-being and quality of life. There has been a growing interest in developing social network interventions for patients with psychotic disorders. A systematic literature review was conducted to investigate the size of social networks of patients with psychotic disorders, as well as their friendship networks. METHODS: A systematic electronic search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsychINFO databases using a combination of search terms relating to ‘social network’, ‘friendship’ and ‘psychotic disorder’. RESULTS: The search identified 23 relevant papers. Out of them, 20 reported patient social network size. Four papers reported the mean number of friends in addition to whole network size, while three further papers focused exclusively on the number of friends. Findings varied substantially across the studies, with a weighted mean size of 11.7 individuals for whole social networks and 3.4 individuals for friendship networks. On average, 43.1 % of the whole social network was composed of family members, while friends accounted for 26.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: Studies assessing whole social network size and friendship networks of people with psychosis are difficult to compare as different concepts and methods of assessment were applied. The extent of the overlap between different social roles assessed in the networks was not always clear. Greater conceptual and methodological clarity is needed in order to help the development of effective strategies to increase social resources of patients with psychosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1528-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4603917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46039172015-10-14 Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review Palumbo, Claudia Volpe, Umberto Matanov, Aleksandra Priebe, Stefan Giacco, Domenico BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Social networks are important for mental health outcomes as they can mobilise resources and help individuals to cope with social stressors. Individuals with psychosis may have specific difficulties in establishing and maintaining social relationships which impacts on their well-being and quality of life. There has been a growing interest in developing social network interventions for patients with psychotic disorders. A systematic literature review was conducted to investigate the size of social networks of patients with psychotic disorders, as well as their friendship networks. METHODS: A systematic electronic search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsychINFO databases using a combination of search terms relating to ‘social network’, ‘friendship’ and ‘psychotic disorder’. RESULTS: The search identified 23 relevant papers. Out of them, 20 reported patient social network size. Four papers reported the mean number of friends in addition to whole network size, while three further papers focused exclusively on the number of friends. Findings varied substantially across the studies, with a weighted mean size of 11.7 individuals for whole social networks and 3.4 individuals for friendship networks. On average, 43.1 % of the whole social network was composed of family members, while friends accounted for 26.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: Studies assessing whole social network size and friendship networks of people with psychosis are difficult to compare as different concepts and methods of assessment were applied. The extent of the overlap between different social roles assessed in the networks was not always clear. Greater conceptual and methodological clarity is needed in order to help the development of effective strategies to increase social resources of patients with psychosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1528-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4603917/ /pubmed/26459046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1528-7 Text en © Palumbo et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Palumbo, Claudia
Volpe, Umberto
Matanov, Aleksandra
Priebe, Stefan
Giacco, Domenico
Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review
title Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review
title_full Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review
title_fullStr Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review
title_short Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review
title_sort social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26459046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1528-7
work_keys_str_mv AT palumboclaudia socialnetworksofpatientswithpsychosisasystematicreview
AT volpeumberto socialnetworksofpatientswithpsychosisasystematicreview
AT matanovaleksandra socialnetworksofpatientswithpsychosisasystematicreview
AT priebestefan socialnetworksofpatientswithpsychosisasystematicreview
AT giaccodomenico socialnetworksofpatientswithpsychosisasystematicreview