Cargando…
Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement
The reliability of experimental findings depends on the rigour of experimental design. Here we show limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in a random sample of life sciences publications, significantly lower reporting of randomisation in work published in journals of high impact,...
Autores principales: | Macleod, Malcolm R., Lawson McLean, Aaron, Kyriakopoulou, Aikaterini, Serghiou, Stylianos, de Wilde, Arno, Sherratt, Nicki, Hirst, Theo, Hemblade, Rachel, Bahor, Zsanett, Nunes-Fonseca, Cristina, Potluru, Aparna, Thomson, Andrew, Baginskitae, Julija, Egan, Kieren, Vesterinen, Hanna, Currie, Gillian L., Churilov, Leonid, Howells, David W., Sena, Emily S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26460723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction: Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement
por: Macleod, Malcolm R., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Long noncoding RNAs as novel predictors of survival in human cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Serghiou, Stylianos, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews
por: Hair, Kaitlyn, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Evidence synthesis in trial design: an example from the neurosciences
por: Egan, Kieren, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Improving our understanding of the in vivo modelling of psychotic disorders: A protocol for a systematic review and meta‐analysis
por: Bahor, Zsanett, et al.
Publicado: (2017)