Cargando…

Evolution of the vertebrate skeleton: morphology, embryology, and development

Two major skeletal systems—the endoskeleton and exoskeleton—are recognized in vertebrate evolution. Here, we propose that these two systems are distinguished primarily by their relative positions, not by differences in embryonic histogenesis or cell lineage of origin. Comparative embryologic analyse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirasawa, Tatsuya, Kuratani, Shigeru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40851-014-0007-7
_version_ 1782395005152788480
author Hirasawa, Tatsuya
Kuratani, Shigeru
author_facet Hirasawa, Tatsuya
Kuratani, Shigeru
author_sort Hirasawa, Tatsuya
collection PubMed
description Two major skeletal systems—the endoskeleton and exoskeleton—are recognized in vertebrate evolution. Here, we propose that these two systems are distinguished primarily by their relative positions, not by differences in embryonic histogenesis or cell lineage of origin. Comparative embryologic analyses have shown that both types of skeleton have changed their mode of histogenesis during evolution. Although exoskeletons were thought to arise exclusively from the neural crest, recent experiments in teleosts have shown that exoskeletons in the trunk are mesodermal in origin. The enameloid and dentine-coated postcranial exoskeleton seen in many vertebrates does not appear to represent an ancestral condition, as previously hypothesized, but rather a derived condition, in which the enameloid and dentine tissues became accreted to bones. Recent data from placoderm fossils are compatible with this scenario. In contrast, the skull contains neural crest-derived bones in its rostral part. Recent developmental studies suggest that the boundary between neural crest- and mesoderm-derived bones may not be consistent throughout evolution. Rather, the relative positions of bony elements may be conserved, and homologies of bony elements have been retained, with opportunistic changes in the mechanisms and cell lineages of development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4604106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46041062015-11-24 Evolution of the vertebrate skeleton: morphology, embryology, and development Hirasawa, Tatsuya Kuratani, Shigeru Zoological Lett Review Two major skeletal systems—the endoskeleton and exoskeleton—are recognized in vertebrate evolution. Here, we propose that these two systems are distinguished primarily by their relative positions, not by differences in embryonic histogenesis or cell lineage of origin. Comparative embryologic analyses have shown that both types of skeleton have changed their mode of histogenesis during evolution. Although exoskeletons were thought to arise exclusively from the neural crest, recent experiments in teleosts have shown that exoskeletons in the trunk are mesodermal in origin. The enameloid and dentine-coated postcranial exoskeleton seen in many vertebrates does not appear to represent an ancestral condition, as previously hypothesized, but rather a derived condition, in which the enameloid and dentine tissues became accreted to bones. Recent data from placoderm fossils are compatible with this scenario. In contrast, the skull contains neural crest-derived bones in its rostral part. Recent developmental studies suggest that the boundary between neural crest- and mesoderm-derived bones may not be consistent throughout evolution. Rather, the relative positions of bony elements may be conserved, and homologies of bony elements have been retained, with opportunistic changes in the mechanisms and cell lineages of development. BioMed Central 2015-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4604106/ /pubmed/26605047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40851-014-0007-7 Text en © Hirasawa and Kuratani; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Hirasawa, Tatsuya
Kuratani, Shigeru
Evolution of the vertebrate skeleton: morphology, embryology, and development
title Evolution of the vertebrate skeleton: morphology, embryology, and development
title_full Evolution of the vertebrate skeleton: morphology, embryology, and development
title_fullStr Evolution of the vertebrate skeleton: morphology, embryology, and development
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of the vertebrate skeleton: morphology, embryology, and development
title_short Evolution of the vertebrate skeleton: morphology, embryology, and development
title_sort evolution of the vertebrate skeleton: morphology, embryology, and development
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40851-014-0007-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hirasawatatsuya evolutionofthevertebrateskeletonmorphologyembryologyanddevelopment
AT kuratanishigeru evolutionofthevertebrateskeletonmorphologyembryologyanddevelopment