Cargando…
Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise
The goal of the study was to enlarge knowledge of discrimination of complex sound signals by the auditory system in masking noise. For that, influence of masking noise on detection of shift of rippled spectrum was studied in normal listeners. The signal was a shift of ripple phase within a 0.5-oct w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140313 |
_version_ | 1782395019901009920 |
---|---|
author | Nechaev, Dmitry I. Milekhina, Olga N. Supin, Alexander Ya. |
author_facet | Nechaev, Dmitry I. Milekhina, Olga N. Supin, Alexander Ya. |
author_sort | Nechaev, Dmitry I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The goal of the study was to enlarge knowledge of discrimination of complex sound signals by the auditory system in masking noise. For that, influence of masking noise on detection of shift of rippled spectrum was studied in normal listeners. The signal was a shift of ripple phase within a 0.5-oct wide rippled spectrum centered at 2 kHz. The ripples were frequency-proportional (throughout the band, ripple spacing was a constant proportion of the ripple center frequency). Simultaneous masker was a 0.5-oct noise below-, on-, or above the signal band. Both the low-frequency (center frequency 1 kHz) and on-frequency (the same center frequency as for the signal) maskers increased the thresholds for detecting ripple phase shift. However, the threshold dependence on the masker level was different for these two maskers. For the on-frequency masker, the masking effect primarily depended on the masker/signal ratio: the threshold steeply increased at a ratio of 5 dB, and no shift was detectable at a ratio of 10 dB. For the low-frequency masker, the masking effect primarily depended on the masker level: the threshold increased at a masker level of 80 dB SPL, and no shift was detectable at a masker level of 90 dB (for a signal level of 50 dB) or 100 dB (for a signal level of 80 dB). The high-frequency masker had little effect. The data were successfully simulated using an excitation-pattern model. In this model, the effect of the on-frequency masker appeared to be primarily due to a decrease of ripple depth. The effect of the low-frequency masker appeared due to widening of the auditory filters at high sound levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4604195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46041952015-10-20 Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise Nechaev, Dmitry I. Milekhina, Olga N. Supin, Alexander Ya. PLoS One Research Article The goal of the study was to enlarge knowledge of discrimination of complex sound signals by the auditory system in masking noise. For that, influence of masking noise on detection of shift of rippled spectrum was studied in normal listeners. The signal was a shift of ripple phase within a 0.5-oct wide rippled spectrum centered at 2 kHz. The ripples were frequency-proportional (throughout the band, ripple spacing was a constant proportion of the ripple center frequency). Simultaneous masker was a 0.5-oct noise below-, on-, or above the signal band. Both the low-frequency (center frequency 1 kHz) and on-frequency (the same center frequency as for the signal) maskers increased the thresholds for detecting ripple phase shift. However, the threshold dependence on the masker level was different for these two maskers. For the on-frequency masker, the masking effect primarily depended on the masker/signal ratio: the threshold steeply increased at a ratio of 5 dB, and no shift was detectable at a ratio of 10 dB. For the low-frequency masker, the masking effect primarily depended on the masker level: the threshold increased at a masker level of 80 dB SPL, and no shift was detectable at a masker level of 90 dB (for a signal level of 50 dB) or 100 dB (for a signal level of 80 dB). The high-frequency masker had little effect. The data were successfully simulated using an excitation-pattern model. In this model, the effect of the on-frequency masker appeared to be primarily due to a decrease of ripple depth. The effect of the low-frequency masker appeared due to widening of the auditory filters at high sound levels. Public Library of Science 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4604195/ /pubmed/26462066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140313 Text en © 2015 Nechaev et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nechaev, Dmitry I. Milekhina, Olga N. Supin, Alexander Ya. Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise |
title | Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise |
title_full | Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise |
title_fullStr | Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise |
title_full_unstemmed | Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise |
title_short | Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise |
title_sort | hearing sensitivity to shifts of rippled-spectrum sound signals in masking noise |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nechaevdmitryi hearingsensitivitytoshiftsofrippledspectrumsoundsignalsinmaskingnoise AT milekhinaolgan hearingsensitivitytoshiftsofrippledspectrumsoundsignalsinmaskingnoise AT supinalexanderya hearingsensitivitytoshiftsofrippledspectrumsoundsignalsinmaskingnoise |