Cargando…

Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study

Objective To assess the overall effect of the English urgent referral pathway on cancer survival. Setting 8049 general practices in England. Design Cohort study. Linked information from the national Cancer Waiting Times database, NHS Exeter database, and National Cancer Register was used to estimate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Møller, Henrik, Gildea, Carolynn, Meechan, David, Rubin, Greg, Round, Thomas, Vedsted, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5102
_version_ 1782395024186540032
author Møller, Henrik
Gildea, Carolynn
Meechan, David
Rubin, Greg
Round, Thomas
Vedsted, Peter
author_facet Møller, Henrik
Gildea, Carolynn
Meechan, David
Rubin, Greg
Round, Thomas
Vedsted, Peter
author_sort Møller, Henrik
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess the overall effect of the English urgent referral pathway on cancer survival. Setting 8049 general practices in England. Design Cohort study. Linked information from the national Cancer Waiting Times database, NHS Exeter database, and National Cancer Register was used to estimate mortality in patients in relation to the propensity of their general practice to use the urgent referral pathway. Participants 215 284 patients with cancer, diagnosed or first treated in England in 2009 and followed up to 2013. Outcome measure Hazard ratios for death from any cause, as estimated from a Cox proportional hazards regression. Results During four years of follow-up, 91 620 deaths occurred, of which 51 606 (56%) occurred within the first year after diagnosis. Two measures of the propensity to use urgent referral, the standardised referral ratio and the detection rate, were associated with reduced mortality. The hazard ratio for the combination of high referral ratio and high detection rate was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.94 to 0.99), applying to 16% (n=34 758) of the study population. Patients with cancer who were registered with general practices with the lowest use of urgent referral had an excess mortality (hazard ratio 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.08); 37% (n=79 416) of the study population). The comparator group for these two hazard ratios was the remaining 47% (n=101 110) of the study population. This result in mortality was consistent for different types of cancer (apart from breast cancer) and with other stratifications of the dataset, and was not sensitive to adjustment for potential confounders and other details of the statistical model. Conclusions Use of the urgent referral pathway could be efficacious. General practices that consistently have a low propensity to use urgent referrals could consider increasing the use of this pathway to improve the survival of their patients with cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4604216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46042162015-10-21 Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study Møller, Henrik Gildea, Carolynn Meechan, David Rubin, Greg Round, Thomas Vedsted, Peter BMJ Research Objective To assess the overall effect of the English urgent referral pathway on cancer survival. Setting 8049 general practices in England. Design Cohort study. Linked information from the national Cancer Waiting Times database, NHS Exeter database, and National Cancer Register was used to estimate mortality in patients in relation to the propensity of their general practice to use the urgent referral pathway. Participants 215 284 patients with cancer, diagnosed or first treated in England in 2009 and followed up to 2013. Outcome measure Hazard ratios for death from any cause, as estimated from a Cox proportional hazards regression. Results During four years of follow-up, 91 620 deaths occurred, of which 51 606 (56%) occurred within the first year after diagnosis. Two measures of the propensity to use urgent referral, the standardised referral ratio and the detection rate, were associated with reduced mortality. The hazard ratio for the combination of high referral ratio and high detection rate was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.94 to 0.99), applying to 16% (n=34 758) of the study population. Patients with cancer who were registered with general practices with the lowest use of urgent referral had an excess mortality (hazard ratio 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.08); 37% (n=79 416) of the study population). The comparator group for these two hazard ratios was the remaining 47% (n=101 110) of the study population. This result in mortality was consistent for different types of cancer (apart from breast cancer) and with other stratifications of the dataset, and was not sensitive to adjustment for potential confounders and other details of the statistical model. Conclusions Use of the urgent referral pathway could be efficacious. General practices that consistently have a low propensity to use urgent referrals could consider increasing the use of this pathway to improve the survival of their patients with cancer. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4604216/ /pubmed/26462713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5102 Text en © Møller et al 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Møller, Henrik
Gildea, Carolynn
Meechan, David
Rubin, Greg
Round, Thomas
Vedsted, Peter
Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study
title Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study
title_full Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study
title_fullStr Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study
title_short Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study
title_sort use of the english urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5102
work_keys_str_mv AT møllerhenrik useoftheenglishurgentreferralpathwayforsuspectedcancerandmortalityinpatientswithcancercohortstudy
AT gildeacarolynn useoftheenglishurgentreferralpathwayforsuspectedcancerandmortalityinpatientswithcancercohortstudy
AT meechandavid useoftheenglishurgentreferralpathwayforsuspectedcancerandmortalityinpatientswithcancercohortstudy
AT rubingreg useoftheenglishurgentreferralpathwayforsuspectedcancerandmortalityinpatientswithcancercohortstudy
AT roundthomas useoftheenglishurgentreferralpathwayforsuspectedcancerandmortalityinpatientswithcancercohortstudy
AT vedstedpeter useoftheenglishurgentreferralpathwayforsuspectedcancerandmortalityinpatientswithcancercohortstudy