Cargando…

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Gastric Surgical Unit

PURPOSE: Although several studies report risk factors for anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, they have yielded conflicting results. The present retrospective cohort study was performed to identify risk factors that are consistently associated with anastomotic leakage after gas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sung-Ho, Son, Sang-Yong, Park, Young-Suk, Ahn, Sang-Hoon, Park, Do Joong, Kim, Hyung-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468414
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.3.167
_version_ 1782395044930519040
author Kim, Sung-Ho
Son, Sang-Yong
Park, Young-Suk
Ahn, Sang-Hoon
Park, Do Joong
Kim, Hyung-Ho
author_facet Kim, Sung-Ho
Son, Sang-Yong
Park, Young-Suk
Ahn, Sang-Hoon
Park, Do Joong
Kim, Hyung-Ho
author_sort Kim, Sung-Ho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although several studies report risk factors for anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, they have yielded conflicting results. The present retrospective cohort study was performed to identify risk factors that are consistently associated with anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy for stomach cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy at a single gastric surgical unit between May 2003 and December 2012 were identified retrospectively. The associations between anastomotic leakage and 23 variables related to patient history, diagnosis, and surgery were assessed and analyzed with logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 3,827 patients were included. The rate of anastomotic leakage was 1.88% (72/3,827). Multiple regression analysis showed that male sex (P=0.001), preoperative/intraoperative transfusion (P<0.001), presence of cardiovascular disease (P=0.023), and tumor location (P<0.001) were predictive of anastomotic leakage. Patients with and without leakage did not differ significantly in terms of their 5-year survival: 97.6 vs. 109.5 months (P=0.076). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, cardiovascular disease, perioperative transfusion, and tumor location in the upper third of the stomach were associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Although several studies have reported that an anastomotic complication has a negative impact on long-term survival, this association was not observed in the present study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4604331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46043312015-10-14 Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Gastric Surgical Unit Kim, Sung-Ho Son, Sang-Yong Park, Young-Suk Ahn, Sang-Hoon Park, Do Joong Kim, Hyung-Ho J Gastric Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Although several studies report risk factors for anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, they have yielded conflicting results. The present retrospective cohort study was performed to identify risk factors that are consistently associated with anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy for stomach cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy at a single gastric surgical unit between May 2003 and December 2012 were identified retrospectively. The associations between anastomotic leakage and 23 variables related to patient history, diagnosis, and surgery were assessed and analyzed with logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 3,827 patients were included. The rate of anastomotic leakage was 1.88% (72/3,827). Multiple regression analysis showed that male sex (P=0.001), preoperative/intraoperative transfusion (P<0.001), presence of cardiovascular disease (P=0.023), and tumor location (P<0.001) were predictive of anastomotic leakage. Patients with and without leakage did not differ significantly in terms of their 5-year survival: 97.6 vs. 109.5 months (P=0.076). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, cardiovascular disease, perioperative transfusion, and tumor location in the upper third of the stomach were associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Although several studies have reported that an anastomotic complication has a negative impact on long-term survival, this association was not observed in the present study. The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2015-09 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4604331/ /pubmed/26468414 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.3.167 Text en Copyright © 2015 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Sung-Ho
Son, Sang-Yong
Park, Young-Suk
Ahn, Sang-Hoon
Park, Do Joong
Kim, Hyung-Ho
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Gastric Surgical Unit
title Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Gastric Surgical Unit
title_full Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Gastric Surgical Unit
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Gastric Surgical Unit
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Gastric Surgical Unit
title_short Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Gastric Surgical Unit
title_sort risk factors for anastomotic leakage: a retrospective cohort study in a single gastric surgical unit
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468414
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.3.167
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsungho riskfactorsforanastomoticleakagearetrospectivecohortstudyinasinglegastricsurgicalunit
AT sonsangyong riskfactorsforanastomoticleakagearetrospectivecohortstudyinasinglegastricsurgicalunit
AT parkyoungsuk riskfactorsforanastomoticleakagearetrospectivecohortstudyinasinglegastricsurgicalunit
AT ahnsanghoon riskfactorsforanastomoticleakagearetrospectivecohortstudyinasinglegastricsurgicalunit
AT parkdojoong riskfactorsforanastomoticleakagearetrospectivecohortstudyinasinglegastricsurgicalunit
AT kimhyungho riskfactorsforanastomoticleakagearetrospectivecohortstudyinasinglegastricsurgicalunit