Cargando…

Efficacy of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Radicular Pain: Results of a Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Pregabalin is commonly used to treat patients with various neuropathic pain syndromes. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin in patients with lumbar or cervical radicular pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Khalid M., M. Nelson, Ariana, J. Avram, Michael, Lee Robak, Sabrina, T. Benzon, Honorio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478867
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.28110
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Pregabalin is commonly used to treat patients with various neuropathic pain syndromes. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin in patients with lumbar or cervical radicular pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted in 39 patients with lumbar and cervical radicular pain, who received 3 weeks of either pregabalin (n = 10) or placebo (n = 9) treatment. Baseline pain and disability were evaluated before the treatment and were re-evaluated, along with overall patient satisfaction, after the 3 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Data on 19 of the 39 patients recruited were available for analysis. No statistically significant differences in the pain, disability, and patient satisfaction scores were found between the groups. When the individual patient scores were assessed, the placebo treatment was found to be efficacious in 4 of the 9 patients and pregabalin was effective in 2 of the 10 patients, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.350). CONCLUSIONS: The present data do not suggest that pregabalin is more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of lumbar and cervical radicular pain. However, the small sample size of this study may have affected the ability to detect such a difference.