Cargando…

Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence

Although there is considerable literature pertaining to IgE and non IgE-mediated food allergy, there is a paucity of information on non-immune mediated reactions to foods, other than metabolic disorders such as lactose intolerance. Food additives and naturally occurring ‘food chemicals’ have long be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skypala, Isabel J., Williams, M., Reeves, L., Meyer, R., Venter, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-015-0078-3
_version_ 1782395078535282688
author Skypala, Isabel J.
Williams, M.
Reeves, L.
Meyer, R.
Venter, C.
author_facet Skypala, Isabel J.
Williams, M.
Reeves, L.
Meyer, R.
Venter, C.
author_sort Skypala, Isabel J.
collection PubMed
description Although there is considerable literature pertaining to IgE and non IgE-mediated food allergy, there is a paucity of information on non-immune mediated reactions to foods, other than metabolic disorders such as lactose intolerance. Food additives and naturally occurring ‘food chemicals’ have long been reported as having the potential to provoke symptoms in those who are more sensitive to their effects. Diets low in ‘food chemicals’ gained prominence in the 1970s and 1980s, and their popularity remains, although the evidence of their efficacy is very limited. This review focuses on the available evidence for the role and likely adverse effects of both added and natural ‘food chemicals’ including benzoate, sulphite, monosodium glutamate, vaso-active or biogenic amines and salicylate. Studies assessing the efficacy of the restriction of these substances in the diet have mainly been undertaken in adults, but the paper will also touch on the use of such diets in children. The difficulty of reviewing the available evidence is that few of the studies have been controlled and, for many, considerable time has elapsed since their publication. Meanwhile dietary patterns and habits have changed hugely in the interim, so the conclusions may not be relevant for our current dietary norms. The conclusion of the review is that there may be some benefit in the removal of an additive or a group of foods high in natural food chemicals from the diet for a limited period for certain individuals, providing the diagnostic pathway is followed and the foods are reintroduced back into the diet to assess for the efficacy of removal. However diets involving the removal of multiple additives and food chemicals have the very great potential to lead to nutritional deficiency especially in the paediatric population. Any dietary intervention, whether for the purposes of diagnosis or management of food allergy or food intolerance, should be adapted to the individual’s dietary habits and a suitably trained dietitian should ensure nutritional needs are met. Ultimately a healthy diet should be the aim for all patients presenting in the allergy clinic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4604636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46046362015-10-15 Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence Skypala, Isabel J. Williams, M. Reeves, L. Meyer, R. Venter, C. Clin Transl Allergy Review Although there is considerable literature pertaining to IgE and non IgE-mediated food allergy, there is a paucity of information on non-immune mediated reactions to foods, other than metabolic disorders such as lactose intolerance. Food additives and naturally occurring ‘food chemicals’ have long been reported as having the potential to provoke symptoms in those who are more sensitive to their effects. Diets low in ‘food chemicals’ gained prominence in the 1970s and 1980s, and their popularity remains, although the evidence of their efficacy is very limited. This review focuses on the available evidence for the role and likely adverse effects of both added and natural ‘food chemicals’ including benzoate, sulphite, monosodium glutamate, vaso-active or biogenic amines and salicylate. Studies assessing the efficacy of the restriction of these substances in the diet have mainly been undertaken in adults, but the paper will also touch on the use of such diets in children. The difficulty of reviewing the available evidence is that few of the studies have been controlled and, for many, considerable time has elapsed since their publication. Meanwhile dietary patterns and habits have changed hugely in the interim, so the conclusions may not be relevant for our current dietary norms. The conclusion of the review is that there may be some benefit in the removal of an additive or a group of foods high in natural food chemicals from the diet for a limited period for certain individuals, providing the diagnostic pathway is followed and the foods are reintroduced back into the diet to assess for the efficacy of removal. However diets involving the removal of multiple additives and food chemicals have the very great potential to lead to nutritional deficiency especially in the paediatric population. Any dietary intervention, whether for the purposes of diagnosis or management of food allergy or food intolerance, should be adapted to the individual’s dietary habits and a suitably trained dietitian should ensure nutritional needs are met. Ultimately a healthy diet should be the aim for all patients presenting in the allergy clinic. BioMed Central 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4604636/ /pubmed/26468368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-015-0078-3 Text en © Skypala et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Skypala, Isabel J.
Williams, M.
Reeves, L.
Meyer, R.
Venter, C.
Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence
title Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence
title_full Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence
title_fullStr Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence
title_short Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence
title_sort sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-015-0078-3
work_keys_str_mv AT skypalaisabelj sensitivitytofoodadditivesvasoactiveaminesandsalicylatesareviewoftheevidence
AT williamsm sensitivitytofoodadditivesvasoactiveaminesandsalicylatesareviewoftheevidence
AT reevesl sensitivitytofoodadditivesvasoactiveaminesandsalicylatesareviewoftheevidence
AT meyerr sensitivitytofoodadditivesvasoactiveaminesandsalicylatesareviewoftheevidence
AT venterc sensitivitytofoodadditivesvasoactiveaminesandsalicylatesareviewoftheevidence