Cargando…

Comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND: Some authors consider that secondary prevention should be conducted for all DM2 patients, while others suggest that the drug preventive treatment should start or be increased depending on each patient’s individual CVR, estimated using cardiovascular or coronary risk functions to identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodriguez-Poncelas, Antonio, Coll-de-Tuero, Gabriel, Saez, Marc, Garrido-Martín, José M., Millaruelo-Trillo, José M., Barrot de-la-Puente, Joan, Franch-Nadal, Josep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0120-3
_version_ 1782395164370665472
author Rodriguez-Poncelas, Antonio
Coll-de-Tuero, Gabriel
Saez, Marc
Garrido-Martín, José M.
Millaruelo-Trillo, José M.
Barrot de-la-Puente, Joan
Franch-Nadal, Josep
author_facet Rodriguez-Poncelas, Antonio
Coll-de-Tuero, Gabriel
Saez, Marc
Garrido-Martín, José M.
Millaruelo-Trillo, José M.
Barrot de-la-Puente, Joan
Franch-Nadal, Josep
author_sort Rodriguez-Poncelas, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some authors consider that secondary prevention should be conducted for all DM2 patients, while others suggest that the drug preventive treatment should start or be increased depending on each patient’s individual CVR, estimated using cardiovascular or coronary risk functions to identify the patients with a higher CVR. The principal objective of this study was to assess three different cardiovascular risk prediction models in type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: Multicentre, cross-sectional descriptive study of 3,041 patients with type 2 diabetes and no history of cardiovascular disease. The demographic, clinical, analytical, and cardiovascular risk factor variables associated with type 2 diabetes were analysed. The risk function and probability that a cardiovascular disease could occur were estimated using three risk engines: REGICOR, UKPDS and ADVANCE. A patient was considered to have a high cardiovascular risk when REGICOR ≥ 10 % or UKPDS ≥ 15 % in 10 years or when ADVANCE ≥ 8 % in 4 years. RESULTS: The ADVANCE and UKPDS risk engines identified a higher number of diabetic patients with a high cardiovascular risk (24.2 % and 22.7 %, respectively) compared to the REGICOR risk engine (10.2 %). The correlation using the REGICOR risk engine was low compared to UKPDS and ADVANCE (r = 0.288 and r = 0.153, respectively; p < 0.0001). The agreement values in the allocation of a particular patient to the high risk group was low between the REGICOR engine and the UKPDS and ADVANCE engines (k = 0.205 and k = 0.123, respectively; p < 0.0001) and acceptable between the ADVANCE and UKPDS risk engines (k = 0.608). CONCLUSIONS: There are discrepancies between the general population and the type 2 diabetic patient-specific risk engines. The results of this study indicate the need for a prospective study which validates specific equations for diabetic patients in the Spanish population, as well as research on new models for cardiovascular risk prediction in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4605091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46050912015-10-15 Comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk Rodriguez-Poncelas, Antonio Coll-de-Tuero, Gabriel Saez, Marc Garrido-Martín, José M. Millaruelo-Trillo, José M. Barrot de-la-Puente, Joan Franch-Nadal, Josep BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Some authors consider that secondary prevention should be conducted for all DM2 patients, while others suggest that the drug preventive treatment should start or be increased depending on each patient’s individual CVR, estimated using cardiovascular or coronary risk functions to identify the patients with a higher CVR. The principal objective of this study was to assess three different cardiovascular risk prediction models in type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: Multicentre, cross-sectional descriptive study of 3,041 patients with type 2 diabetes and no history of cardiovascular disease. The demographic, clinical, analytical, and cardiovascular risk factor variables associated with type 2 diabetes were analysed. The risk function and probability that a cardiovascular disease could occur were estimated using three risk engines: REGICOR, UKPDS and ADVANCE. A patient was considered to have a high cardiovascular risk when REGICOR ≥ 10 % or UKPDS ≥ 15 % in 10 years or when ADVANCE ≥ 8 % in 4 years. RESULTS: The ADVANCE and UKPDS risk engines identified a higher number of diabetic patients with a high cardiovascular risk (24.2 % and 22.7 %, respectively) compared to the REGICOR risk engine (10.2 %). The correlation using the REGICOR risk engine was low compared to UKPDS and ADVANCE (r = 0.288 and r = 0.153, respectively; p < 0.0001). The agreement values in the allocation of a particular patient to the high risk group was low between the REGICOR engine and the UKPDS and ADVANCE engines (k = 0.205 and k = 0.123, respectively; p < 0.0001) and acceptable between the ADVANCE and UKPDS risk engines (k = 0.608). CONCLUSIONS: There are discrepancies between the general population and the type 2 diabetic patient-specific risk engines. The results of this study indicate the need for a prospective study which validates specific equations for diabetic patients in the Spanish population, as well as research on new models for cardiovascular risk prediction in these patients. BioMed Central 2015-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4605091/ /pubmed/26464076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0120-3 Text en © Rodriguez-Poncelas et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rodriguez-Poncelas, Antonio
Coll-de-Tuero, Gabriel
Saez, Marc
Garrido-Martín, José M.
Millaruelo-Trillo, José M.
Barrot de-la-Puente, Joan
Franch-Nadal, Josep
Comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk
title Comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk
title_full Comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk
title_fullStr Comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk
title_short Comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk
title_sort comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0120-3
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezponcelasantonio comparisonofdifferentvascularriskenginesintheidentificationoftype2diabetespatientswithhighcardiovascularrisk
AT colldetuerogabriel comparisonofdifferentvascularriskenginesintheidentificationoftype2diabetespatientswithhighcardiovascularrisk
AT saezmarc comparisonofdifferentvascularriskenginesintheidentificationoftype2diabetespatientswithhighcardiovascularrisk
AT garridomartinjosem comparisonofdifferentvascularriskenginesintheidentificationoftype2diabetespatientswithhighcardiovascularrisk
AT millaruelotrillojosem comparisonofdifferentvascularriskenginesintheidentificationoftype2diabetespatientswithhighcardiovascularrisk
AT barrotdelapuentejoan comparisonofdifferentvascularriskenginesintheidentificationoftype2diabetespatientswithhighcardiovascularrisk
AT franchnadaljosep comparisonofdifferentvascularriskenginesintheidentificationoftype2diabetespatientswithhighcardiovascularrisk
AT comparisonofdifferentvascularriskenginesintheidentificationoftype2diabetespatientswithhighcardiovascularrisk