Cargando…

Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States

BACKGROUND: Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsui, Edmund, Siedlecki, Andrew N, Deng, Jie, Pollard, Margaret C, Cha, Sandolsam, Pepin, Susan M, Salcone, Erin M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504372
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S90321
_version_ 1782395177134981120
author Tsui, Edmund
Siedlecki, Andrew N
Deng, Jie
Pollard, Margaret C
Cha, Sandolsam
Pepin, Susan M
Salcone, Erin M
author_facet Tsui, Edmund
Siedlecki, Andrew N
Deng, Jie
Pollard, Margaret C
Cha, Sandolsam
Pepin, Susan M
Salcone, Erin M
author_sort Tsui, Edmund
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont. METHODS: Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63% female), 74/103 (72%) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89%) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88%) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38% of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21%), retinal diseases (8%), amblyopia (8%), cataract (6%), others (6%), and normal examination (12%). Of the 8/74 (11%) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0–50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients’ last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1–54 years). CONCLUSION: This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4605244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46052442015-10-26 Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States Tsui, Edmund Siedlecki, Andrew N Deng, Jie Pollard, Margaret C Cha, Sandolsam Pepin, Susan M Salcone, Erin M Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont. METHODS: Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63% female), 74/103 (72%) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89%) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88%) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38% of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21%), retinal diseases (8%), amblyopia (8%), cataract (6%), others (6%), and normal examination (12%). Of the 8/74 (11%) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0–50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients’ last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1–54 years). CONCLUSION: This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting. Dove Medical Press 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4605244/ /pubmed/26504372 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S90321 Text en © 2015 Tsui et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tsui, Edmund
Siedlecki, Andrew N
Deng, Jie
Pollard, Margaret C
Cha, Sandolsam
Pepin, Susan M
Salcone, Erin M
Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States
title Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States
title_full Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States
title_fullStr Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States
title_short Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States
title_sort implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern united states
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504372
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S90321
work_keys_str_mv AT tsuiedmund implementationofavisionscreeningprograminruralnortheasternunitedstates
AT siedleckiandrewn implementationofavisionscreeningprograminruralnortheasternunitedstates
AT dengjie implementationofavisionscreeningprograminruralnortheasternunitedstates
AT pollardmargaretc implementationofavisionscreeningprograminruralnortheasternunitedstates
AT chasandolsam implementationofavisionscreeningprograminruralnortheasternunitedstates
AT pepinsusanm implementationofavisionscreeningprograminruralnortheasternunitedstates
AT salconeerinm implementationofavisionscreeningprograminruralnortheasternunitedstates