Cargando…

Molecular Differences between Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Adjacent Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Study

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for approximately 20% of mammographically detected breast cancers. Although DCIS is generally highly curable, some women with DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive breast cancer, but the determinants of progression to infiltrating ductal cancer (IDC) ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moelans, Cathy B., de Weger, Roel A., Monsuur, Hanneke N., Maes, Anoek H. J., van Diest, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20978320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ACP-CLO-2010-0546
_version_ 1782395205062754304
author Moelans, Cathy B.
de Weger, Roel A.
Monsuur, Hanneke N.
Maes, Anoek H. J.
van Diest, Paul J.
author_facet Moelans, Cathy B.
de Weger, Roel A.
Monsuur, Hanneke N.
Maes, Anoek H. J.
van Diest, Paul J.
author_sort Moelans, Cathy B.
collection PubMed
description Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for approximately 20% of mammographically detected breast cancers. Although DCIS is generally highly curable, some women with DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive breast cancer, but the determinants of progression to infiltrating ductal cancer (IDC) are largely unknown. In the current study, we used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a multiplex PCR-based test, to compare copy numbers of 21 breast cancer related genes between laser-microdissected DCIS and adjacent IDC lesions in 39 patients. Genes included in this study were ESR1, EGFR, FGFR1, ADAM9, IKBKB, PRDM14, MTDH, MYC, CCND1, EMSY, CDH1, TRAF4, CPD, MED1, HER2, CDC6, TOP2A, MAPT, BIRC5, CCNE1 and AURKA. There were no significant differences in copy number for the 21 genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC. Low/intermediate-grade DCIS showed on average 6 gains/amplifications versus 8 in high-grade DCIS (p=0.158). Furthermore, alterations of AURKA and CCNE1 were exclusively found in high-grade DCIS, and HER2, PRDM14 and EMSY amplification was more frequent in high-grade DCIS than in low/intermediate-grade DCIS. In contrast, the average number of alterations in low/intermediate and high-grade IDC was similar, and although EGFR alterations were exclusively found in high-grade IDC compared to low/intermediate-grade IDC, there were generally fewer differences between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade IDC than between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade DCIS. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in copy number for 21 breast cancer related genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC, indicating that DCIS is genetically as advanced as its invasive counterpart. However, high-grade DCIS showed more copy number changes than low/intermediate-grade DCIS with specifically involved genes, supporting a model in which different histological grades of DCIS are associated with distinct genomic changes that progress to IDC in different routes. These high-grade DCIS specific genes may be potential targets for treatment and/or predict progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4605452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46054522015-12-13 Molecular Differences between Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Adjacent Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Study Moelans, Cathy B. de Weger, Roel A. Monsuur, Hanneke N. Maes, Anoek H. J. van Diest, Paul J. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) Other Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for approximately 20% of mammographically detected breast cancers. Although DCIS is generally highly curable, some women with DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive breast cancer, but the determinants of progression to infiltrating ductal cancer (IDC) are largely unknown. In the current study, we used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a multiplex PCR-based test, to compare copy numbers of 21 breast cancer related genes between laser-microdissected DCIS and adjacent IDC lesions in 39 patients. Genes included in this study were ESR1, EGFR, FGFR1, ADAM9, IKBKB, PRDM14, MTDH, MYC, CCND1, EMSY, CDH1, TRAF4, CPD, MED1, HER2, CDC6, TOP2A, MAPT, BIRC5, CCNE1 and AURKA. There were no significant differences in copy number for the 21 genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC. Low/intermediate-grade DCIS showed on average 6 gains/amplifications versus 8 in high-grade DCIS (p=0.158). Furthermore, alterations of AURKA and CCNE1 were exclusively found in high-grade DCIS, and HER2, PRDM14 and EMSY amplification was more frequent in high-grade DCIS than in low/intermediate-grade DCIS. In contrast, the average number of alterations in low/intermediate and high-grade IDC was similar, and although EGFR alterations were exclusively found in high-grade IDC compared to low/intermediate-grade IDC, there were generally fewer differences between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade IDC than between low/intermediate-grade and high-grade DCIS. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in copy number for 21 breast cancer related genes between DCIS and adjacent IDC, indicating that DCIS is genetically as advanced as its invasive counterpart. However, high-grade DCIS showed more copy number changes than low/intermediate-grade DCIS with specifically involved genes, supporting a model in which different histological grades of DCIS are associated with distinct genomic changes that progress to IDC in different routes. These high-grade DCIS specific genes may be potential targets for treatment and/or predict progression. IOS Press 2010 2010-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4605452/ /pubmed/20978320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ACP-CLO-2010-0546 Text en Copyright © 2010 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors.
spellingShingle Other
Moelans, Cathy B.
de Weger, Roel A.
Monsuur, Hanneke N.
Maes, Anoek H. J.
van Diest, Paul J.
Molecular Differences between Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Adjacent Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Study
title Molecular Differences between Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Adjacent Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Study
title_full Molecular Differences between Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Adjacent Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Study
title_fullStr Molecular Differences between Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Adjacent Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Study
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Differences between Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Adjacent Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Study
title_short Molecular Differences between Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Adjacent Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Study
title_sort molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20978320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ACP-CLO-2010-0546
work_keys_str_mv AT moelanscathyb moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy
AT dewegerroela moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy
AT monsuurhanneken moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy
AT maesanoekhj moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy
AT vandiestpaulj moleculardifferencesbetweenductalcarcinomainsituandadjacentinvasivebreastcarcinomaamultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationstudy