Cargando…

Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey

OBJECTIVE: Patient-centered clinical trial design and execution is becoming increasingly important. No best practice guidelines exist despite a key stakeholder declaration to create more effective engagement models. This study aims to gain a better understanding of attitudes and practices for engagi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Sophia K., Selig, Wendy, Harker, Matthew, Roberts, Jamie N., Hesterlee, Sharon, Leventhal, David, Klein, Richard, Patrick-Lake, Bray, Abernethy, Amy P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26465328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140232
_version_ 1782395249296932864
author Smith, Sophia K.
Selig, Wendy
Harker, Matthew
Roberts, Jamie N.
Hesterlee, Sharon
Leventhal, David
Klein, Richard
Patrick-Lake, Bray
Abernethy, Amy P.
author_facet Smith, Sophia K.
Selig, Wendy
Harker, Matthew
Roberts, Jamie N.
Hesterlee, Sharon
Leventhal, David
Klein, Richard
Patrick-Lake, Bray
Abernethy, Amy P.
author_sort Smith, Sophia K.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patient-centered clinical trial design and execution is becoming increasingly important. No best practice guidelines exist despite a key stakeholder declaration to create more effective engagement models. This study aims to gain a better understanding of attitudes and practices for engaging patient groups so that actionable recommendations may be developed. METHODS: Individuals from industry, academic institutions, and patient groups were identified through Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative and Drug Information Association rosters and mailing lists. Objectives, practices, and perceived barriers related to engaging patient groups in the planning, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials were reported in an online survey. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of survey data followed a literature review to inform survey questions. RESULTS: Survey respondents (n = 179) valued the importance of involving patient groups in research; however, patient group respondents valued their contributions to research protocol development, funding acquisition, and interpretation of study results more highly than those contributions were valued by industry and academic respondents (all p < .001). Patient group respondents placed higher value in open communications, clear expectations, and detailed contract execution than did non–patient group respondents (all p < .05). Industry and academic respondents more often cited internal bureaucratic processes and reluctance to share information as engagement barriers than did patient group respondents (all p < .01). Patient groups reported that a lack of transparency and understanding of the benefits of collaboration on the part of industry and academia were greater barriers than did non–patient group respondents (all p< .01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite reported similarities among approaches to engagement by the three stakeholder groups, key differences exist in perceived barriers and benefits to partnering with patient groups among the sectors studied. This recognition could inform the development of best practices for patient-centered clinical trial design and execution. Additional research is needed to define and optimize key success factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4605726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46057262015-10-29 Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey Smith, Sophia K. Selig, Wendy Harker, Matthew Roberts, Jamie N. Hesterlee, Sharon Leventhal, David Klein, Richard Patrick-Lake, Bray Abernethy, Amy P. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Patient-centered clinical trial design and execution is becoming increasingly important. No best practice guidelines exist despite a key stakeholder declaration to create more effective engagement models. This study aims to gain a better understanding of attitudes and practices for engaging patient groups so that actionable recommendations may be developed. METHODS: Individuals from industry, academic institutions, and patient groups were identified through Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative and Drug Information Association rosters and mailing lists. Objectives, practices, and perceived barriers related to engaging patient groups in the planning, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials were reported in an online survey. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of survey data followed a literature review to inform survey questions. RESULTS: Survey respondents (n = 179) valued the importance of involving patient groups in research; however, patient group respondents valued their contributions to research protocol development, funding acquisition, and interpretation of study results more highly than those contributions were valued by industry and academic respondents (all p < .001). Patient group respondents placed higher value in open communications, clear expectations, and detailed contract execution than did non–patient group respondents (all p < .05). Industry and academic respondents more often cited internal bureaucratic processes and reluctance to share information as engagement barriers than did patient group respondents (all p < .01). Patient groups reported that a lack of transparency and understanding of the benefits of collaboration on the part of industry and academia were greater barriers than did non–patient group respondents (all p< .01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite reported similarities among approaches to engagement by the three stakeholder groups, key differences exist in perceived barriers and benefits to partnering with patient groups among the sectors studied. This recognition could inform the development of best practices for patient-centered clinical trial design and execution. Additional research is needed to define and optimize key success factors. Public Library of Science 2015-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4605726/ /pubmed/26465328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140232 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Sophia K.
Selig, Wendy
Harker, Matthew
Roberts, Jamie N.
Hesterlee, Sharon
Leventhal, David
Klein, Richard
Patrick-Lake, Bray
Abernethy, Amy P.
Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey
title Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey
title_full Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey
title_fullStr Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey
title_full_unstemmed Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey
title_short Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey
title_sort patient engagement practices in clinical research among patient groups, industry, and academia in the united states: a survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26465328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140232
work_keys_str_mv AT smithsophiak patientengagementpracticesinclinicalresearchamongpatientgroupsindustryandacademiaintheunitedstatesasurvey
AT seligwendy patientengagementpracticesinclinicalresearchamongpatientgroupsindustryandacademiaintheunitedstatesasurvey
AT harkermatthew patientengagementpracticesinclinicalresearchamongpatientgroupsindustryandacademiaintheunitedstatesasurvey
AT robertsjamien patientengagementpracticesinclinicalresearchamongpatientgroupsindustryandacademiaintheunitedstatesasurvey
AT hesterleesharon patientengagementpracticesinclinicalresearchamongpatientgroupsindustryandacademiaintheunitedstatesasurvey
AT leventhaldavid patientengagementpracticesinclinicalresearchamongpatientgroupsindustryandacademiaintheunitedstatesasurvey
AT kleinrichard patientengagementpracticesinclinicalresearchamongpatientgroupsindustryandacademiaintheunitedstatesasurvey
AT patricklakebray patientengagementpracticesinclinicalresearchamongpatientgroupsindustryandacademiaintheunitedstatesasurvey
AT abernethyamyp patientengagementpracticesinclinicalresearchamongpatientgroupsindustryandacademiaintheunitedstatesasurvey