Cargando…

A Comparison of Digitized Frozen Section and Smear Preparations for Intraoperative Neurotelepathology

Background: Intraoperative consultations in neuropathology are often assessed by smear preparations rather than by frozen sections. Both techniques are standard practice for light microscopic examination on site, but there is little data comparing these techniques in a telepathology setting. Methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gould, Peter V., Saikali, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22297471
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ACP-2011-0026
_version_ 1782395260679225344
author Gould, Peter V.
Saikali, Stephan
author_facet Gould, Peter V.
Saikali, Stephan
author_sort Gould, Peter V.
collection PubMed
description Background: Intraoperative consultations in neuropathology are often assessed by smear preparations rather than by frozen sections. Both techniques are standard practice for light microscopic examination on site, but there is little data comparing these techniques in a telepathology setting. Methods: Thirty cases of brain tumours submitted for intraoperative consultation at our institution between July and December 2010 were identified in which both frozen section and tissue smear preparations were available for digitization at 20× magnification. Slides were digitized using a Hamamatsu Nanozoomer 2.0 HT whole slide scanner, and resulting digital images were visualized at 1680 × 1050 pixel resolution with NDP. view software. Results: The original intraoperative diagnosis was concordant with the sign out diagnosis in 29/30 cases; one tumeur was initially interpreted as a high grade glioma but proved to be a lymphoma at sign out. Digitized frozen section slides were sufficient for diagnosis at 10× magnification in 27/30 cases. Digitized tissue smears were sufficient for diagnosis at 10× magnification in 28/30 cases. In two cases tumour was present on the tissue smear but not the frozen section (one case of recurrent astrocytoma, one case of meningeal carcinomatosis). In one case of lymphoma, tumour was present on frozen section only. These discrepancies were attributed to tissue sampling rather than image quality. Examination of digitized slides at higher magnfication (20×) permitted confirmation of mitoses and Rosenthal fibers on tissue smear preparations, but did not change the primary diagnosis. Intra-slide variations in tissue thickness on smear preparations led to variable loss of focus in digitized images, but did not affect image quality in thinner areas of the smear or impede diagnosis. Conclusion: Digitized tissue smears are suitable for intraoperative neurotelepathology and provide comparable information to digitized frozen sections at medium power magnification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4605780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46057802015-12-13 A Comparison of Digitized Frozen Section and Smear Preparations for Intraoperative Neurotelepathology Gould, Peter V. Saikali, Stephan Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) Other Background: Intraoperative consultations in neuropathology are often assessed by smear preparations rather than by frozen sections. Both techniques are standard practice for light microscopic examination on site, but there is little data comparing these techniques in a telepathology setting. Methods: Thirty cases of brain tumours submitted for intraoperative consultation at our institution between July and December 2010 were identified in which both frozen section and tissue smear preparations were available for digitization at 20× magnification. Slides were digitized using a Hamamatsu Nanozoomer 2.0 HT whole slide scanner, and resulting digital images were visualized at 1680 × 1050 pixel resolution with NDP. view software. Results: The original intraoperative diagnosis was concordant with the sign out diagnosis in 29/30 cases; one tumeur was initially interpreted as a high grade glioma but proved to be a lymphoma at sign out. Digitized frozen section slides were sufficient for diagnosis at 10× magnification in 27/30 cases. Digitized tissue smears were sufficient for diagnosis at 10× magnification in 28/30 cases. In two cases tumour was present on the tissue smear but not the frozen section (one case of recurrent astrocytoma, one case of meningeal carcinomatosis). In one case of lymphoma, tumour was present on frozen section only. These discrepancies were attributed to tissue sampling rather than image quality. Examination of digitized slides at higher magnfication (20×) permitted confirmation of mitoses and Rosenthal fibers on tissue smear preparations, but did not change the primary diagnosis. Intra-slide variations in tissue thickness on smear preparations led to variable loss of focus in digitized images, but did not affect image quality in thinner areas of the smear or impede diagnosis. Conclusion: Digitized tissue smears are suitable for intraoperative neurotelepathology and provide comparable information to digitized frozen sections at medium power magnification. IOS Press 2012 2012-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4605780/ /pubmed/22297471 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ACP-2011-0026 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors.
spellingShingle Other
Gould, Peter V.
Saikali, Stephan
A Comparison of Digitized Frozen Section and Smear Preparations for Intraoperative Neurotelepathology
title A Comparison of Digitized Frozen Section and Smear Preparations for Intraoperative Neurotelepathology
title_full A Comparison of Digitized Frozen Section and Smear Preparations for Intraoperative Neurotelepathology
title_fullStr A Comparison of Digitized Frozen Section and Smear Preparations for Intraoperative Neurotelepathology
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Digitized Frozen Section and Smear Preparations for Intraoperative Neurotelepathology
title_short A Comparison of Digitized Frozen Section and Smear Preparations for Intraoperative Neurotelepathology
title_sort comparison of digitized frozen section and smear preparations for intraoperative neurotelepathology
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22297471
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ACP-2011-0026
work_keys_str_mv AT gouldpeterv acomparisonofdigitizedfrozensectionandsmearpreparationsforintraoperativeneurotelepathology
AT saikalistephan acomparisonofdigitizedfrozensectionandsmearpreparationsforintraoperativeneurotelepathology
AT gouldpeterv comparisonofdigitizedfrozensectionandsmearpreparationsforintraoperativeneurotelepathology
AT saikalistephan comparisonofdigitizedfrozensectionandsmearpreparationsforintraoperativeneurotelepathology