Cargando…

Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis

SUMMARY: The MOVEST study evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate versus licensed monthly IV ibandronate in Japanese osteoporotic patients. Relative BMD gains after 12 months were 5.22 % oral and 5.34 % IV, showing non-inferiority of oral to IV ibandronate (primary endpoint). N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, T., Ito, M., Hashimoto, J., Shinomiya, K., Asao, Y., Katsumata, K., Hagino, H., Inoue, T., Nakano, T., Mizunuma, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26001561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3175-1
_version_ 1782395285094268928
author Nakamura, T.
Ito, M.
Hashimoto, J.
Shinomiya, K.
Asao, Y.
Katsumata, K.
Hagino, H.
Inoue, T.
Nakano, T.
Mizunuma, H.
author_facet Nakamura, T.
Ito, M.
Hashimoto, J.
Shinomiya, K.
Asao, Y.
Katsumata, K.
Hagino, H.
Inoue, T.
Nakano, T.
Mizunuma, H.
author_sort Nakamura, T.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: The MOVEST study evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate versus licensed monthly IV ibandronate in Japanese osteoporotic patients. Relative BMD gains after 12 months were 5.22 % oral and 5.34 % IV, showing non-inferiority of oral to IV ibandronate (primary endpoint). No new safety concerns were identified. INTRODUCTION: The randomized, phase 3, double-blind MOVEST (Monthly Oral VErsus intravenouS ibandronaTe) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate versus the licensed monthly intravenous (IV) ibandronate regimen in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: Ambulatory patients aged ≥55 years with primary osteoporosis were randomized to receive oral ibandronate 100 mg/month plus monthly IV placebo, or IV ibandronate 1 mg/month plus monthly oral placebo. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of oral versus IV ibandronate with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) gains at the lumbar spine after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled with 372 patients in the per-protocol set (183 and 189 in the oral and IV ibandronate groups, respectively). The relative change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD values for the oral and IV ibandronate groups, respectively, was 5.22 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 4.65, 5.80) and 5.34 % (95 % CI 4.78, 5.90). The least squares mean difference between the two groups was −0.23 % (95 % CI −0.97, 0.51), showing non-inferiority of oral ibandronate to IV ibandronate (non-inferiority limit = −1.60). Changes in BMD values at other sites, and bone turnover marker levels in the oral ibandronate group, were comparable with those of the IV group. The safety profile was similar to that previously demonstrated; no new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of oral ibandronate 100 mg/month to IV ibandronate 1 mg/month (licensed dose in Japan) in increasing lumbar spine BMD in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3175-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4605968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46059682015-10-19 Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis Nakamura, T. Ito, M. Hashimoto, J. Shinomiya, K. Asao, Y. Katsumata, K. Hagino, H. Inoue, T. Nakano, T. Mizunuma, H. Osteoporos Int Original Article SUMMARY: The MOVEST study evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate versus licensed monthly IV ibandronate in Japanese osteoporotic patients. Relative BMD gains after 12 months were 5.22 % oral and 5.34 % IV, showing non-inferiority of oral to IV ibandronate (primary endpoint). No new safety concerns were identified. INTRODUCTION: The randomized, phase 3, double-blind MOVEST (Monthly Oral VErsus intravenouS ibandronaTe) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate versus the licensed monthly intravenous (IV) ibandronate regimen in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: Ambulatory patients aged ≥55 years with primary osteoporosis were randomized to receive oral ibandronate 100 mg/month plus monthly IV placebo, or IV ibandronate 1 mg/month plus monthly oral placebo. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of oral versus IV ibandronate with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) gains at the lumbar spine after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled with 372 patients in the per-protocol set (183 and 189 in the oral and IV ibandronate groups, respectively). The relative change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD values for the oral and IV ibandronate groups, respectively, was 5.22 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 4.65, 5.80) and 5.34 % (95 % CI 4.78, 5.90). The least squares mean difference between the two groups was −0.23 % (95 % CI −0.97, 0.51), showing non-inferiority of oral ibandronate to IV ibandronate (non-inferiority limit = −1.60). Changes in BMD values at other sites, and bone turnover marker levels in the oral ibandronate group, were comparable with those of the IV group. The safety profile was similar to that previously demonstrated; no new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of oral ibandronate 100 mg/month to IV ibandronate 1 mg/month (licensed dose in Japan) in increasing lumbar spine BMD in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3175-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer London 2015-05-23 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4605968/ /pubmed/26001561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3175-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nakamura, T.
Ito, M.
Hashimoto, J.
Shinomiya, K.
Asao, Y.
Katsumata, K.
Hagino, H.
Inoue, T.
Nakano, T.
Mizunuma, H.
Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis
title Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis
title_full Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis
title_short Clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis
title_sort clinical efficacy and safety of monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg versus monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in japanese patients with primary osteoporosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26001561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3175-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurat clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT itom clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT hashimotoj clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT shinomiyak clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT asaoy clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT katsumatak clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT haginoh clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT inouet clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT nakanot clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT mizunumah clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis
AT clinicalefficacyandsafetyofmonthlyoralibandronate100mgversusmonthlyintravenousibandronate1mginjapanesepatientswithprimaryosteoporosis