Cargando…

Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating

Belief updating—the process by which an agent alters an internal model of its environment—is a core function of the CNS. Recent theory has proposed broad principles by which belief updating might operate, but more precise details of its implementation in the human brain remain unclear. In order to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennett, Daniel, Murawski, Carsten, Bode, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26473170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0076-15.2015
_version_ 1782395326180622336
author Bennett, Daniel
Murawski, Carsten
Bode, Stefan
author_facet Bennett, Daniel
Murawski, Carsten
Bode, Stefan
author_sort Bennett, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Belief updating—the process by which an agent alters an internal model of its environment—is a core function of the CNS. Recent theory has proposed broad principles by which belief updating might operate, but more precise details of its implementation in the human brain remain unclear. In order to address this question, we studied how two components of the human event-related potential encoded different aspects of belief updating. Participants completed a novel perceptual learning task while electroencephalography was recorded. Participants learned the mapping between the contrast of a dynamic visual stimulus and a monetary reward and updated their beliefs about a target contrast on each trial. A Bayesian computational model was formulated to estimate belief states at each trial and was used to quantify the following two variables: belief update size and belief uncertainty. Robust single-trial regression was used to assess how these model-derived variables were related to the amplitudes of the P3 and the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), respectively. Results showed a positive relationship between belief update size and P3 amplitude at one fronto-central electrode, and a negative relationship between SPN amplitude and belief uncertainty at a left central and a right parietal electrode. These results provide evidence that belief update size and belief uncertainty have distinct neural signatures that can be tracked in single trials in specific ERP components. This, in turn, provides evidence that the cognitive mechanisms underlying belief updating in humans can be described well within a Bayesian framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4606160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46061602015-10-15 Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating Bennett, Daniel Murawski, Carsten Bode, Stefan eNeuro New Research Belief updating—the process by which an agent alters an internal model of its environment—is a core function of the CNS. Recent theory has proposed broad principles by which belief updating might operate, but more precise details of its implementation in the human brain remain unclear. In order to address this question, we studied how two components of the human event-related potential encoded different aspects of belief updating. Participants completed a novel perceptual learning task while electroencephalography was recorded. Participants learned the mapping between the contrast of a dynamic visual stimulus and a monetary reward and updated their beliefs about a target contrast on each trial. A Bayesian computational model was formulated to estimate belief states at each trial and was used to quantify the following two variables: belief update size and belief uncertainty. Robust single-trial regression was used to assess how these model-derived variables were related to the amplitudes of the P3 and the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), respectively. Results showed a positive relationship between belief update size and P3 amplitude at one fronto-central electrode, and a negative relationship between SPN amplitude and belief uncertainty at a left central and a right parietal electrode. These results provide evidence that belief update size and belief uncertainty have distinct neural signatures that can be tracked in single trials in specific ERP components. This, in turn, provides evidence that the cognitive mechanisms underlying belief updating in humans can be described well within a Bayesian framework. Society for Neuroscience 2015-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4606160/ /pubmed/26473170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0076-15.2015 Text en Copyright © 2015 Bennett et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle New Research
Bennett, Daniel
Murawski, Carsten
Bode, Stefan
Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating
title Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating
title_full Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating
title_fullStr Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating
title_full_unstemmed Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating
title_short Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating
title_sort single-trial event-related potential correlates of belief updating
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26473170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0076-15.2015
work_keys_str_mv AT bennettdaniel singletrialeventrelatedpotentialcorrelatesofbeliefupdating
AT murawskicarsten singletrialeventrelatedpotentialcorrelatesofbeliefupdating
AT bodestefan singletrialeventrelatedpotentialcorrelatesofbeliefupdating