Cargando…

Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function

Objectives. To evaluate alterations in sexual function and genital sensitivity after anastomotic repair (AR) and free graft urethroplasty (FGU) for bulbar urethral strictures. Methods. Patients treated with AR (n = 31) or FGU (n = 16) were prospectively evaluated before, 6 weeks and 6 months after u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beysens, Matthias, Palminteri, Enzo, Oosterlinck, Willem, Spinoit, Anne-Françoise, Hoebeke, Piet, François, Philippe, Decaestecker, Karel, Lumen, Nicolaas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26494997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/912438
_version_ 1782395331713957888
author Beysens, Matthias
Palminteri, Enzo
Oosterlinck, Willem
Spinoit, Anne-Françoise
Hoebeke, Piet
François, Philippe
Decaestecker, Karel
Lumen, Nicolaas
author_facet Beysens, Matthias
Palminteri, Enzo
Oosterlinck, Willem
Spinoit, Anne-Françoise
Hoebeke, Piet
François, Philippe
Decaestecker, Karel
Lumen, Nicolaas
author_sort Beysens, Matthias
collection PubMed
description Objectives. To evaluate alterations in sexual function and genital sensitivity after anastomotic repair (AR) and free graft urethroplasty (FGU) for bulbar urethral strictures. Methods. Patients treated with AR (n = 31) or FGU (n = 16) were prospectively evaluated before, 6 weeks and 6 months after urethroplasty. Evaluation included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), 5-Item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), Ejaculation/Orgasm Score (EOS), and 3 questions on genital sensitivity. Results. At 6 weeks, there was a significant decline of IIEF-5 for AR (−4.8; p = 0.005), whereas there was no significant change for FGU (+0.9; p = 0.115). After 6 months, differences with baseline were not significant overall and among subgroups. At 6 weeks, there was a significant decline in EOS for AR (−1.4; p = 0.022). In the FGU group there was no significant change (+0.6; p = 0.12). Overall and among subgroups, EOS normalized at 6 months. After 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively, 62.2 and 52% of patients reported alterations in penile sensitivity with no significant differences among subgroups. Conclusions. AR is associated with a transient decline in erectile and ejaculatory function. This was not observed with FGU. Bulbar AR and FGU are likely to alter genital sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4606193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46061932015-10-22 Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function Beysens, Matthias Palminteri, Enzo Oosterlinck, Willem Spinoit, Anne-Françoise Hoebeke, Piet François, Philippe Decaestecker, Karel Lumen, Nicolaas Adv Urol Clinical Study Objectives. To evaluate alterations in sexual function and genital sensitivity after anastomotic repair (AR) and free graft urethroplasty (FGU) for bulbar urethral strictures. Methods. Patients treated with AR (n = 31) or FGU (n = 16) were prospectively evaluated before, 6 weeks and 6 months after urethroplasty. Evaluation included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), 5-Item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), Ejaculation/Orgasm Score (EOS), and 3 questions on genital sensitivity. Results. At 6 weeks, there was a significant decline of IIEF-5 for AR (−4.8; p = 0.005), whereas there was no significant change for FGU (+0.9; p = 0.115). After 6 months, differences with baseline were not significant overall and among subgroups. At 6 weeks, there was a significant decline in EOS for AR (−1.4; p = 0.022). In the FGU group there was no significant change (+0.6; p = 0.12). Overall and among subgroups, EOS normalized at 6 months. After 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively, 62.2 and 52% of patients reported alterations in penile sensitivity with no significant differences among subgroups. Conclusions. AR is associated with a transient decline in erectile and ejaculatory function. This was not observed with FGU. Bulbar AR and FGU are likely to alter genital sensitivity. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4606193/ /pubmed/26494997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/912438 Text en Copyright © 2015 Matthias Beysens et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Beysens, Matthias
Palminteri, Enzo
Oosterlinck, Willem
Spinoit, Anne-Françoise
Hoebeke, Piet
François, Philippe
Decaestecker, Karel
Lumen, Nicolaas
Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function
title Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function
title_full Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function
title_fullStr Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function
title_full_unstemmed Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function
title_short Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function
title_sort anastomotic repair versus free graft urethroplasty for bulbar strictures: a focus on the impact on sexual function
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26494997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/912438
work_keys_str_mv AT beysensmatthias anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction
AT palminterienzo anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction
AT oosterlinckwillem anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction
AT spinoitannefrancoise anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction
AT hoebekepiet anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction
AT francoisphilippe anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction
AT decaesteckerkarel anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction
AT lumennicolaas anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction