Cargando…
Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function
Objectives. To evaluate alterations in sexual function and genital sensitivity after anastomotic repair (AR) and free graft urethroplasty (FGU) for bulbar urethral strictures. Methods. Patients treated with AR (n = 31) or FGU (n = 16) were prospectively evaluated before, 6 weeks and 6 months after u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26494997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/912438 |
_version_ | 1782395331713957888 |
---|---|
author | Beysens, Matthias Palminteri, Enzo Oosterlinck, Willem Spinoit, Anne-Françoise Hoebeke, Piet François, Philippe Decaestecker, Karel Lumen, Nicolaas |
author_facet | Beysens, Matthias Palminteri, Enzo Oosterlinck, Willem Spinoit, Anne-Françoise Hoebeke, Piet François, Philippe Decaestecker, Karel Lumen, Nicolaas |
author_sort | Beysens, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives. To evaluate alterations in sexual function and genital sensitivity after anastomotic repair (AR) and free graft urethroplasty (FGU) for bulbar urethral strictures. Methods. Patients treated with AR (n = 31) or FGU (n = 16) were prospectively evaluated before, 6 weeks and 6 months after urethroplasty. Evaluation included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), 5-Item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), Ejaculation/Orgasm Score (EOS), and 3 questions on genital sensitivity. Results. At 6 weeks, there was a significant decline of IIEF-5 for AR (−4.8; p = 0.005), whereas there was no significant change for FGU (+0.9; p = 0.115). After 6 months, differences with baseline were not significant overall and among subgroups. At 6 weeks, there was a significant decline in EOS for AR (−1.4; p = 0.022). In the FGU group there was no significant change (+0.6; p = 0.12). Overall and among subgroups, EOS normalized at 6 months. After 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively, 62.2 and 52% of patients reported alterations in penile sensitivity with no significant differences among subgroups. Conclusions. AR is associated with a transient decline in erectile and ejaculatory function. This was not observed with FGU. Bulbar AR and FGU are likely to alter genital sensitivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4606193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46061932015-10-22 Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function Beysens, Matthias Palminteri, Enzo Oosterlinck, Willem Spinoit, Anne-Françoise Hoebeke, Piet François, Philippe Decaestecker, Karel Lumen, Nicolaas Adv Urol Clinical Study Objectives. To evaluate alterations in sexual function and genital sensitivity after anastomotic repair (AR) and free graft urethroplasty (FGU) for bulbar urethral strictures. Methods. Patients treated with AR (n = 31) or FGU (n = 16) were prospectively evaluated before, 6 weeks and 6 months after urethroplasty. Evaluation included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), 5-Item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), Ejaculation/Orgasm Score (EOS), and 3 questions on genital sensitivity. Results. At 6 weeks, there was a significant decline of IIEF-5 for AR (−4.8; p = 0.005), whereas there was no significant change for FGU (+0.9; p = 0.115). After 6 months, differences with baseline were not significant overall and among subgroups. At 6 weeks, there was a significant decline in EOS for AR (−1.4; p = 0.022). In the FGU group there was no significant change (+0.6; p = 0.12). Overall and among subgroups, EOS normalized at 6 months. After 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively, 62.2 and 52% of patients reported alterations in penile sensitivity with no significant differences among subgroups. Conclusions. AR is associated with a transient decline in erectile and ejaculatory function. This was not observed with FGU. Bulbar AR and FGU are likely to alter genital sensitivity. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4606193/ /pubmed/26494997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/912438 Text en Copyright © 2015 Matthias Beysens et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Beysens, Matthias Palminteri, Enzo Oosterlinck, Willem Spinoit, Anne-Françoise Hoebeke, Piet François, Philippe Decaestecker, Karel Lumen, Nicolaas Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function |
title | Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function |
title_full | Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function |
title_fullStr | Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function |
title_full_unstemmed | Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function |
title_short | Anastomotic Repair versus Free Graft Urethroplasty for Bulbar Strictures: A Focus on the Impact on Sexual Function |
title_sort | anastomotic repair versus free graft urethroplasty for bulbar strictures: a focus on the impact on sexual function |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26494997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/912438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beysensmatthias anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction AT palminterienzo anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction AT oosterlinckwillem anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction AT spinoitannefrancoise anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction AT hoebekepiet anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction AT francoisphilippe anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction AT decaesteckerkarel anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction AT lumennicolaas anastomoticrepairversusfreegrafturethroplastyforbulbarstricturesafocusontheimpactonsexualfunction |