Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a network meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Anxiety disorders are associated with significant public health burden in young individuals. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most commonly used psychotherapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents, but previous reviews were hindered by a limited number of trials w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008572 |
_version_ | 1782395340069011456 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yuqing Zhou, Xinyu James, Anthony C Qin, Bin Whittington, Craig J Cuijpers, Pim Del Giovane, Cinzia Liu, Yiyun Cohen, David Weisz, John R Xie, Peng |
author_facet | Zhang, Yuqing Zhou, Xinyu James, Anthony C Qin, Bin Whittington, Craig J Cuijpers, Pim Del Giovane, Cinzia Liu, Yiyun Cohen, David Weisz, John R Xie, Peng |
author_sort | Zhang, Yuqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Anxiety disorders are associated with significant public health burden in young individuals. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most commonly used psychotherapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents, but previous reviews were hindered by a limited number of trials with direct comparisons between different psychotherapies and their deliveries. Consequently, the main aim of this research was to investigate the comparative efficacy and acceptability of various types and deliveries of psychotherapies for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will systematically search PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations and LiLACS for randomised controlled trials, regardless of whether participants received blinding or not, published from 1 January 1966 to 30 January 2015 (updated to 1 July 2015), that compared any psychotherapy with either a control condition or an active comparator with different types and/or different delivery formats for the acute treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Data extraction, risk of bias and quality assessments will be independently extracted by two reviewers. The primary outcome for efficacy will be mean overall change scores in anxiety symptoms (self-rated or assessor-rated) from baseline to post-treatment between two groups. The acceptability of treatment will be measured as the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment during the acute phase of treatment. We will assess efficacy, based on the standardised mean difference (SMD), and acceptability, based on the OR, using a random-effects network meta-analysis within a Bayesian framework. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be disseminated electronically and in print. The meta-analysis may be updated to inform and guide management of anxiety in children and adolescents. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42015016283. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4606384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46063842015-10-22 Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a network meta-analysis Zhang, Yuqing Zhou, Xinyu James, Anthony C Qin, Bin Whittington, Craig J Cuijpers, Pim Del Giovane, Cinzia Liu, Yiyun Cohen, David Weisz, John R Xie, Peng BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Anxiety disorders are associated with significant public health burden in young individuals. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most commonly used psychotherapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents, but previous reviews were hindered by a limited number of trials with direct comparisons between different psychotherapies and their deliveries. Consequently, the main aim of this research was to investigate the comparative efficacy and acceptability of various types and deliveries of psychotherapies for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will systematically search PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations and LiLACS for randomised controlled trials, regardless of whether participants received blinding or not, published from 1 January 1966 to 30 January 2015 (updated to 1 July 2015), that compared any psychotherapy with either a control condition or an active comparator with different types and/or different delivery formats for the acute treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Data extraction, risk of bias and quality assessments will be independently extracted by two reviewers. The primary outcome for efficacy will be mean overall change scores in anxiety symptoms (self-rated or assessor-rated) from baseline to post-treatment between two groups. The acceptability of treatment will be measured as the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment during the acute phase of treatment. We will assess efficacy, based on the standardised mean difference (SMD), and acceptability, based on the OR, using a random-effects network meta-analysis within a Bayesian framework. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be disseminated electronically and in print. The meta-analysis may be updated to inform and guide management of anxiety in children and adolescents. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42015016283. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4606384/ /pubmed/26443658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008572 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Zhang, Yuqing Zhou, Xinyu James, Anthony C Qin, Bin Whittington, Craig J Cuijpers, Pim Del Giovane, Cinzia Liu, Yiyun Cohen, David Weisz, John R Xie, Peng Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for acute anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a network meta-analysis |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyuqing comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT zhouxinyu comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT jamesanthonyc comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT qinbin comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT whittingtoncraigj comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT cuijperspim comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT delgiovanecinzia comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT liuyiyun comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT cohendavid comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT weiszjohnr comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis AT xiepeng comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityofpsychotherapiesforacuteanxietydisordersinchildrenandadolescentsstudyprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysis |