Cargando…
Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol
INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often the outcomes of greatest importance to patients. The minimally important difference (MID) provides a measure of the smallest change in the PRO that patients perceive as important. An anchor-based approach is the most appropriate method for MID...
Autores principales: | Johnston, Bradley C, Ebrahim, Shanil, Carrasco-Labra, Alonso, Furukawa, Toshi A, Patrick, Donald L, Crawford, Mark W, Hemmelgarn, Brenda R, Schunemann, Holger J, Guyatt, Gordon H, Nesrallah, Gihad |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007953 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
por: Hao, Qiukui, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial
por: Yepes-Nuñez, Juan José, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper
por: Alper, Brian S, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Systematic survey of the causal language use in systematic reviews of observational studies: a study protocol
por: Han, Mi Ah, et al.
Publicado: (2020)