Cargando…

Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in long-term care (LTC) patients: validation of the 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria in a LTC population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data

INTRODUCTION: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is frequent and problematic in older patients. Identifying PIP is necessary to improve prescribing quality; ideally, this should be performed at the population level. Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions/Sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjerre, Lise M, Halil, Roland, Catley, Christina, Farrell, Barbara, Hogel, Matthew, Black, Cody D, Williams, Margo, Ryan, Cristín, Manuel, Douglas G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26453592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009715
_version_ 1782395351500587008
author Bjerre, Lise M
Halil, Roland
Catley, Christina
Farrell, Barbara
Hogel, Matthew
Black, Cody D
Williams, Margo
Ryan, Cristín
Manuel, Douglas G
author_facet Bjerre, Lise M
Halil, Roland
Catley, Christina
Farrell, Barbara
Hogel, Matthew
Black, Cody D
Williams, Margo
Ryan, Cristín
Manuel, Douglas G
author_sort Bjerre, Lise M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is frequent and problematic in older patients. Identifying PIP is necessary to improve prescribing quality; ideally, this should be performed at the population level. Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) and Beers criteria were developed to identify PIP in clinical settings and are useful at the individual patient level; however, they are time-consuming and costly to apply. Only a subset of these criteria is applicable to routinely collected population-level health administrative data (HAD) because the clinical information necessary to implement these tools is often missing from databases. The performance of subsets of STOPP/START and Beers criteria in HAD compared with clinical data from the same patients is unknown; furthermore, the performance of the updated 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria compared with one another is also unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cross-sectional study of linked HAD and clinical data will be conducted to validate the subsets of STOPP/START and Beers criteria applicable to HAD by comparing their performance when applied to clinical and HAD for the same patients. Eligible patients will be 66 years and over and recently admitted to 1 of 6 long-term care facilities in Ottawa, Ontario. The target sample size is 275, but may be less if statistical significance can be achieved sooner. Medication, diagnostic and clinical data will be collected by a consultant pharmacist. The main outcome measure is the proportion of PIP missed by the subset of STOPP/START and Beers criteria applied to HAD when compared with clinical data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ottawa Health Services Network Research Ethics Board, the Bruyère Continuing Care Research Ethics Board and the ethics board of the City of Ottawa Long Term Care Homes. Dissemination will occur via publication, national and international conference presentations, and exchanges with regional, provincial and national stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02523482.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4606433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46064332015-10-22 Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in long-term care (LTC) patients: validation of the 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria in a LTC population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data Bjerre, Lise M Halil, Roland Catley, Christina Farrell, Barbara Hogel, Matthew Black, Cody D Williams, Margo Ryan, Cristín Manuel, Douglas G BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is frequent and problematic in older patients. Identifying PIP is necessary to improve prescribing quality; ideally, this should be performed at the population level. Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) and Beers criteria were developed to identify PIP in clinical settings and are useful at the individual patient level; however, they are time-consuming and costly to apply. Only a subset of these criteria is applicable to routinely collected population-level health administrative data (HAD) because the clinical information necessary to implement these tools is often missing from databases. The performance of subsets of STOPP/START and Beers criteria in HAD compared with clinical data from the same patients is unknown; furthermore, the performance of the updated 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria compared with one another is also unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cross-sectional study of linked HAD and clinical data will be conducted to validate the subsets of STOPP/START and Beers criteria applicable to HAD by comparing their performance when applied to clinical and HAD for the same patients. Eligible patients will be 66 years and over and recently admitted to 1 of 6 long-term care facilities in Ottawa, Ontario. The target sample size is 275, but may be less if statistical significance can be achieved sooner. Medication, diagnostic and clinical data will be collected by a consultant pharmacist. The main outcome measure is the proportion of PIP missed by the subset of STOPP/START and Beers criteria applied to HAD when compared with clinical data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ottawa Health Services Network Research Ethics Board, the Bruyère Continuing Care Research Ethics Board and the ethics board of the City of Ottawa Long Term Care Homes. Dissemination will occur via publication, national and international conference presentations, and exchanges with regional, provincial and national stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02523482. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4606433/ /pubmed/26453592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009715 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Bjerre, Lise M
Halil, Roland
Catley, Christina
Farrell, Barbara
Hogel, Matthew
Black, Cody D
Williams, Margo
Ryan, Cristín
Manuel, Douglas G
Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in long-term care (LTC) patients: validation of the 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria in a LTC population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data
title Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in long-term care (LTC) patients: validation of the 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria in a LTC population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data
title_full Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in long-term care (LTC) patients: validation of the 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria in a LTC population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data
title_fullStr Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in long-term care (LTC) patients: validation of the 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria in a LTC population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data
title_full_unstemmed Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in long-term care (LTC) patients: validation of the 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria in a LTC population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data
title_short Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in long-term care (LTC) patients: validation of the 2014 STOPP-START and 2012 Beers criteria in a LTC population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data
title_sort potentially inappropriate prescribing (pip) in long-term care (ltc) patients: validation of the 2014 stopp-start and 2012 beers criteria in a ltc population—a protocol for a cross-sectional comparison of clinical and health administrative data
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26453592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009715
work_keys_str_mv AT bjerrelisem potentiallyinappropriateprescribingpipinlongtermcareltcpatientsvalidationofthe2014stoppstartand2012beerscriteriainaltcpopulationaprotocolforacrosssectionalcomparisonofclinicalandhealthadministrativedata
AT halilroland potentiallyinappropriateprescribingpipinlongtermcareltcpatientsvalidationofthe2014stoppstartand2012beerscriteriainaltcpopulationaprotocolforacrosssectionalcomparisonofclinicalandhealthadministrativedata
AT catleychristina potentiallyinappropriateprescribingpipinlongtermcareltcpatientsvalidationofthe2014stoppstartand2012beerscriteriainaltcpopulationaprotocolforacrosssectionalcomparisonofclinicalandhealthadministrativedata
AT farrellbarbara potentiallyinappropriateprescribingpipinlongtermcareltcpatientsvalidationofthe2014stoppstartand2012beerscriteriainaltcpopulationaprotocolforacrosssectionalcomparisonofclinicalandhealthadministrativedata
AT hogelmatthew potentiallyinappropriateprescribingpipinlongtermcareltcpatientsvalidationofthe2014stoppstartand2012beerscriteriainaltcpopulationaprotocolforacrosssectionalcomparisonofclinicalandhealthadministrativedata
AT blackcodyd potentiallyinappropriateprescribingpipinlongtermcareltcpatientsvalidationofthe2014stoppstartand2012beerscriteriainaltcpopulationaprotocolforacrosssectionalcomparisonofclinicalandhealthadministrativedata
AT williamsmargo potentiallyinappropriateprescribingpipinlongtermcareltcpatientsvalidationofthe2014stoppstartand2012beerscriteriainaltcpopulationaprotocolforacrosssectionalcomparisonofclinicalandhealthadministrativedata
AT ryancristin potentiallyinappropriateprescribingpipinlongtermcareltcpatientsvalidationofthe2014stoppstartand2012beerscriteriainaltcpopulationaprotocolforacrosssectionalcomparisonofclinicalandhealthadministrativedata
AT manueldouglasg potentiallyinappropriateprescribingpipinlongtermcareltcpatientsvalidationofthe2014stoppstartand2012beerscriteriainaltcpopulationaprotocolforacrosssectionalcomparisonofclinicalandhealthadministrativedata