Cargando…

Study protocol for a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management in mental health services in Hong Kong

INTRODUCTION: Although strengths-based models are popular within recovery-oriented approaches, there is still a lack of conclusive research to guide how they should be implemented. A recent meta-analysis confirmed the lack of clarity in how this perspective is operationalised and that fidelity monit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsoi, Wing-See Emily, Tse, Samson, Fukui, Sadaaki, Jones, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008303
_version_ 1782395354562428928
author Tsoi, Wing-See Emily
Tse, Samson
Fukui, Sadaaki
Jones, Steven
author_facet Tsoi, Wing-See Emily
Tse, Samson
Fukui, Sadaaki
Jones, Steven
author_sort Tsoi, Wing-See Emily
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although strengths-based models are popular within recovery-oriented approaches, there is still a lack of conclusive research to guide how they should be implemented. A recent meta-analysis confirmed the lack of clarity in how this perspective is operationalised and that fidelity monitoring during the implementation process is lacking. Hence, there is a clear need to evaluate the feasibility of delivering and evaluating a clearly operationalised strengths-based intervention that incorporates fidelity checks to inform more definitive research. This protocol therefore describes a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management (SMCM), a complex intervention, for people with severe mental illnesses in Hong Kong. This trial follows the guidelines of the Medical Research Council as a phase 2 trial. Hence, it is a pilot study that tests the feasibility and effectiveness of the model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a 9-month controlled trial that uses the Kansas Model. Participants and a matched control group are recruited on a voluntary basis, after screening for eligibility. Effectiveness of the SMCM will be measured through outcome measures taken at baseline, the mid-point and at the end of the trial. Outcomes for service users include personal recovery, hope, subjective well-being, psychiatric symptoms, perceived level of recovery features within the organisation, therapeutic alliance and achievement of recovery goals. Outcomes for care workers will include job burnout, organisational features of recovery and perceived supervisory support. With a 2×3 analysis of variance design and a moderate intervention effect (Cohen's d=0.50), a total of 86 participants will be needed for a statistical power of 0.80. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee for Non-Clinical Faculties at The University of Hong Kong (HRECNCF: EA140913). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN)12613001120763.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4606446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46064462015-10-22 Study protocol for a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management in mental health services in Hong Kong Tsoi, Wing-See Emily Tse, Samson Fukui, Sadaaki Jones, Steven BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Although strengths-based models are popular within recovery-oriented approaches, there is still a lack of conclusive research to guide how they should be implemented. A recent meta-analysis confirmed the lack of clarity in how this perspective is operationalised and that fidelity monitoring during the implementation process is lacking. Hence, there is a clear need to evaluate the feasibility of delivering and evaluating a clearly operationalised strengths-based intervention that incorporates fidelity checks to inform more definitive research. This protocol therefore describes a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management (SMCM), a complex intervention, for people with severe mental illnesses in Hong Kong. This trial follows the guidelines of the Medical Research Council as a phase 2 trial. Hence, it is a pilot study that tests the feasibility and effectiveness of the model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a 9-month controlled trial that uses the Kansas Model. Participants and a matched control group are recruited on a voluntary basis, after screening for eligibility. Effectiveness of the SMCM will be measured through outcome measures taken at baseline, the mid-point and at the end of the trial. Outcomes for service users include personal recovery, hope, subjective well-being, psychiatric symptoms, perceived level of recovery features within the organisation, therapeutic alliance and achievement of recovery goals. Outcomes for care workers will include job burnout, organisational features of recovery and perceived supervisory support. With a 2×3 analysis of variance design and a moderate intervention effect (Cohen's d=0.50), a total of 86 participants will be needed for a statistical power of 0.80. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee for Non-Clinical Faculties at The University of Hong Kong (HRECNCF: EA140913). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN)12613001120763. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4606446/ /pubmed/26443653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008303 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Tsoi, Wing-See Emily
Tse, Samson
Fukui, Sadaaki
Jones, Steven
Study protocol for a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management in mental health services in Hong Kong
title Study protocol for a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management in mental health services in Hong Kong
title_full Study protocol for a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management in mental health services in Hong Kong
title_fullStr Study protocol for a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management in mental health services in Hong Kong
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management in mental health services in Hong Kong
title_short Study protocol for a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management in mental health services in Hong Kong
title_sort study protocol for a controlled trial of strengths model case management in mental health services in hong kong
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008303
work_keys_str_mv AT tsoiwingseeemily studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofstrengthsmodelcasemanagementinmentalhealthservicesinhongkong
AT tsesamson studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofstrengthsmodelcasemanagementinmentalhealthservicesinhongkong
AT fukuisadaaki studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofstrengthsmodelcasemanagementinmentalhealthservicesinhongkong
AT jonessteven studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofstrengthsmodelcasemanagementinmentalhealthservicesinhongkong