Cargando…

Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment

It is not unusual for institutions around the world to have fixed standards (e.g., 60%) for all of their examinations. This creates problems in the creation of examinations, since all of the content has to be chosen with an eye toward this fixed standard. As a result, the validity of the decisions b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tekian, Ara, Norcini, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26483856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000985
_version_ 1782395358820696064
author Tekian, Ara
Norcini, John
author_facet Tekian, Ara
Norcini, John
author_sort Tekian, Ara
collection PubMed
description It is not unusual for institutions around the world to have fixed standards (e.g., 60%) for all of their examinations. This creates problems in the creation of examinations, since all of the content has to be chosen with an eye toward this fixed standard. As a result, the validity of the decisions based on these examinations can be adversely influenced, making them less useful for their intended purposes. Over the past several decades, many institutions have addressed this problem by using standard setting methods which are defensible, acceptable, and credible [1], [2]. Many methods are available and the major reasons to use them is to ensure that test content is appropriately selected and to be as fair to the students and other test users as possible [2], [3]. One barrier to the wider use of these methods is that some institutions object to the fact that the fixed standard (e.g., 60%) has not been applied. However, it is possible to rescale the passing score so that it is equal to the fixed standard, and then apply that same rescaling calculation to all of the test scores. This ensures that the institutional guidelines are not violated and allows the application of accepted methods of standard-setting. In turn, the application of these methods allow the content of the test to be selected without regard to a fixed standard, increases the validity of the decisions being made, and ensures a fairer and more accurate test of students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4606480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46064802015-10-19 Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment Tekian, Ara Norcini, John GMS Z Med Ausbild Article It is not unusual for institutions around the world to have fixed standards (e.g., 60%) for all of their examinations. This creates problems in the creation of examinations, since all of the content has to be chosen with an eye toward this fixed standard. As a result, the validity of the decisions based on these examinations can be adversely influenced, making them less useful for their intended purposes. Over the past several decades, many institutions have addressed this problem by using standard setting methods which are defensible, acceptable, and credible [1], [2]. Many methods are available and the major reasons to use them is to ensure that test content is appropriately selected and to be as fair to the students and other test users as possible [2], [3]. One barrier to the wider use of these methods is that some institutions object to the fact that the fixed standard (e.g., 60%) has not been applied. However, it is possible to rescale the passing score so that it is equal to the fixed standard, and then apply that same rescaling calculation to all of the test scores. This ensures that the institutional guidelines are not violated and allows the application of accepted methods of standard-setting. In turn, the application of these methods allow the content of the test to be selected without regard to a fixed standard, increases the validity of the decisions being made, and ensures a fairer and more accurate test of students. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2015-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4606480/ /pubmed/26483856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000985 Text en Copyright © 2015 Tekian et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Article
Tekian, Ara
Norcini, John
Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment
title Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment
title_full Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment
title_fullStr Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment
title_full_unstemmed Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment
title_short Overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment
title_sort overcome the 60% passing score and improve the quality of assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26483856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000985
work_keys_str_mv AT tekianara overcomethe60passingscoreandimprovethequalityofassessment
AT norcinijohn overcomethe60passingscoreandimprovethequalityofassessment