Cargando…
Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders
BACKGROUND: Palliative care standards advocate support for grieving caregivers, given that some bereaved people fail to integrate their loss, experience ongoing emotional suffering and adverse health outcomes. Research shows that bereavement support tends to be delivered on an ad hoc basis without f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0046-7 |
_version_ | 1782395371233738752 |
---|---|
author | Sealey, Margaret O’Connor, Moira Aoun, Samar M. Breen, Lauren J. |
author_facet | Sealey, Margaret O’Connor, Moira Aoun, Samar M. Breen, Lauren J. |
author_sort | Sealey, Margaret |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Palliative care standards advocate support for grieving caregivers, given that some bereaved people fail to integrate their loss, experience ongoing emotional suffering and adverse health outcomes. Research shows that bereavement support tends to be delivered on an ad hoc basis without formal assessment of risk or need. To align support with need, assessment of bereavement risk is necessary. The overall aim is to develop a bereavement risk assessment model, based on a three-tiered public health model, congruent with palliative care bereavement standards for use in palliative care in Western Australia. The specific aim of this phase of the study was to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders and to highlight issues in relation to the practice of bereavement risk assessment in palliative care. METHODS: Action research, a cyclical process that involves working collaboratively with stakeholders, was considered as the best method to effect feasible change in practice. The nine participants were multidisciplinary health professionals from five palliative care services, and a bereaved former caregiver. Data were obtained from participants via three 90 min group meetings conducted over five weeks. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to analyse data following each meeting until saturation was reached, and the research team was satisfied that the themes were congruent with research aims. RESULTS: Existing measures were found unsuitable to assess bereavement risk in palliative care. Assessment following the patient’s death presented substantial barriers, directing assessment to the pre-death period. Four themes were identified relating to issues in need of consideration to develop a risk assessment model. These were systems of care, encompassing logistics of contact with caregivers; gatekeeping; conflation between caregiver stress, burden and grief; and a way forward. CONCLUSIONS: These group discussions provide a data-driven explanation of the issues affecting bereavement risk assessment in palliative care settings. A number of barriers will need to be overcome before assessment can become routine practice. We recommend the development of a brief, pre-death caregiver self-report measure of bereavement risk that may empower caregivers, lead to early intervention, and allow staff to remain focused on patient care, reducing burden on staff and palliative care services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4606550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46065502015-10-16 Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders Sealey, Margaret O’Connor, Moira Aoun, Samar M. Breen, Lauren J. BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Palliative care standards advocate support for grieving caregivers, given that some bereaved people fail to integrate their loss, experience ongoing emotional suffering and adverse health outcomes. Research shows that bereavement support tends to be delivered on an ad hoc basis without formal assessment of risk or need. To align support with need, assessment of bereavement risk is necessary. The overall aim is to develop a bereavement risk assessment model, based on a three-tiered public health model, congruent with palliative care bereavement standards for use in palliative care in Western Australia. The specific aim of this phase of the study was to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders and to highlight issues in relation to the practice of bereavement risk assessment in palliative care. METHODS: Action research, a cyclical process that involves working collaboratively with stakeholders, was considered as the best method to effect feasible change in practice. The nine participants were multidisciplinary health professionals from five palliative care services, and a bereaved former caregiver. Data were obtained from participants via three 90 min group meetings conducted over five weeks. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to analyse data following each meeting until saturation was reached, and the research team was satisfied that the themes were congruent with research aims. RESULTS: Existing measures were found unsuitable to assess bereavement risk in palliative care. Assessment following the patient’s death presented substantial barriers, directing assessment to the pre-death period. Four themes were identified relating to issues in need of consideration to develop a risk assessment model. These were systems of care, encompassing logistics of contact with caregivers; gatekeeping; conflation between caregiver stress, burden and grief; and a way forward. CONCLUSIONS: These group discussions provide a data-driven explanation of the issues affecting bereavement risk assessment in palliative care settings. A number of barriers will need to be overcome before assessment can become routine practice. We recommend the development of a brief, pre-death caregiver self-report measure of bereavement risk that may empower caregivers, lead to early intervention, and allow staff to remain focused on patient care, reducing burden on staff and palliative care services. BioMed Central 2015-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4606550/ /pubmed/26466576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0046-7 Text en © Sealey et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sealey, Margaret O’Connor, Moira Aoun, Samar M. Breen, Lauren J. Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders |
title | Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders |
title_full | Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders |
title_fullStr | Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders |
title_short | Exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders |
title_sort | exploring barriers to assessment of bereavement risk in palliative care: perspectives of key stakeholders |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0046-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sealeymargaret exploringbarrierstoassessmentofbereavementriskinpalliativecareperspectivesofkeystakeholders AT oconnormoira exploringbarrierstoassessmentofbereavementriskinpalliativecareperspectivesofkeystakeholders AT aounsamarm exploringbarrierstoassessmentofbereavementriskinpalliativecareperspectivesofkeystakeholders AT breenlaurenj exploringbarrierstoassessmentofbereavementriskinpalliativecareperspectivesofkeystakeholders |