Cargando…
Estimation of a single motor unit's threshold and activation range, a study on patients with muscular disorders
BACKGROUND: In clinical neurophysiology, threshold tracking studies are used to evaluate the functionality of a muscle through studying the functionality of its motor units (MUs) that govern the muscle. The functionality of an MU can be quantified by estimation of its excitability properties via MU&...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26539366 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.165380 |
_version_ | 1782395377370005504 |
---|---|
author | Azadi, Nammam Ali Roshani, Daem |
author_facet | Azadi, Nammam Ali Roshani, Daem |
author_sort | Azadi, Nammam Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In clinical neurophysiology, threshold tracking studies are used to evaluate the functionality of a muscle through studying the functionality of its motor units (MUs) that govern the muscle. The functionality of an MU can be quantified by estimation of its excitability properties via MU's stimulus-response curve. In this study, we aim to develop a model-based approach to estimate MU's threshold mean and its activation range as indications of MU's excitability. This is a different approach from routine strategies in neurophysiology, which are mostly subjective. METHODS: To assess the excitability of a single MU, needle electromyography examination was used to obtain the axonal activity of that MU. To improve estimation, the examination was repeated several times on individuals. Replication of experiment introduces serial correlation between observations. We account for this correlation by using a mixed-effects model. We investigate the appropriateness of classical logistic mixed-effects model and its Bayesian formulation for estimation purpose. RESULTS: Both classical and Bayesian models can obtain a reliable estimation of MU's threshold. However, we found Bayesian approach to provide a better estimate of MU's activation range. Moreover, if data contain outliers both classical and Bayesian methods are vulnerable to some extent. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the classical approach, Bayesian method is more flexible in dealing with overdispersion and provides more robust estimation of MU's parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4606576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46065762015-11-04 Estimation of a single motor unit's threshold and activation range, a study on patients with muscular disorders Azadi, Nammam Ali Roshani, Daem Int J Appl Basic Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: In clinical neurophysiology, threshold tracking studies are used to evaluate the functionality of a muscle through studying the functionality of its motor units (MUs) that govern the muscle. The functionality of an MU can be quantified by estimation of its excitability properties via MU's stimulus-response curve. In this study, we aim to develop a model-based approach to estimate MU's threshold mean and its activation range as indications of MU's excitability. This is a different approach from routine strategies in neurophysiology, which are mostly subjective. METHODS: To assess the excitability of a single MU, needle electromyography examination was used to obtain the axonal activity of that MU. To improve estimation, the examination was repeated several times on individuals. Replication of experiment introduces serial correlation between observations. We account for this correlation by using a mixed-effects model. We investigate the appropriateness of classical logistic mixed-effects model and its Bayesian formulation for estimation purpose. RESULTS: Both classical and Bayesian models can obtain a reliable estimation of MU's threshold. However, we found Bayesian approach to provide a better estimate of MU's activation range. Moreover, if data contain outliers both classical and Bayesian methods are vulnerable to some extent. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the classical approach, Bayesian method is more flexible in dealing with overdispersion and provides more robust estimation of MU's parameters. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4606576/ /pubmed/26539366 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.165380 Text en Copyright: © 2015 International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Azadi, Nammam Ali Roshani, Daem Estimation of a single motor unit's threshold and activation range, a study on patients with muscular disorders |
title | Estimation of a single motor unit's threshold and activation range, a study on patients with muscular disorders |
title_full | Estimation of a single motor unit's threshold and activation range, a study on patients with muscular disorders |
title_fullStr | Estimation of a single motor unit's threshold and activation range, a study on patients with muscular disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of a single motor unit's threshold and activation range, a study on patients with muscular disorders |
title_short | Estimation of a single motor unit's threshold and activation range, a study on patients with muscular disorders |
title_sort | estimation of a single motor unit's threshold and activation range, a study on patients with muscular disorders |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26539366 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.165380 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azadinammamali estimationofasinglemotorunitsthresholdandactivationrangeastudyonpatientswithmusculardisorders AT roshanidaem estimationofasinglemotorunitsthresholdandactivationrangeastudyonpatientswithmusculardisorders |