Cargando…

Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sealing ability of two self-etching adhesive systems and glass ionomer cement (GIC) lining Light cure (LC) under composite restorations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class V cavities are prepared on the cervical third of the facial and lingual surfaces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pragasam, Ananda Xavier, Duraisamy, Vinola, Nayak, Ullal Anand, Reddy, Venugopal, Rao, Arun Prasad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538910
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.163525
_version_ 1782395394796290048
author Pragasam, Ananda Xavier
Duraisamy, Vinola
Nayak, Ullal Anand
Reddy, Venugopal
Rao, Arun Prasad
author_facet Pragasam, Ananda Xavier
Duraisamy, Vinola
Nayak, Ullal Anand
Reddy, Venugopal
Rao, Arun Prasad
author_sort Pragasam, Ananda Xavier
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sealing ability of two self-etching adhesive systems and glass ionomer cement (GIC) lining Light cure (LC) under composite restorations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class V cavities are prepared on the cervical third of the facial and lingual surfaces of primary molars. The specimens are then assigned into four experimental groups. The restored primary molars are stored in distilled water and subjected to thermocycling. Each section was examined using a stereomicroscope to assess dye penetration at the margin of the restoration and evaluated via pictures. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The degree of microleakage was analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test and the intergroup significance by multiple comparison analysis. RESULTS: The mean rank of the groups are Group I (Adper Prompt™ + Z−100) 19.44, Group II (UniFil BOND + Solare) 5.38, Group III (GIC lining LC + Z−100) 20.06, and Group IV (GIC lining LC + Solare) 21.13 with the P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Composite resin restorations bonded with two-step self-etching adhesive system (UniFil Bond) exhibited lesser microleakage than one-step self-etching adhesive system (Adperprompt™) in primary teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4606652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46066522015-11-04 Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study Pragasam, Ananda Xavier Duraisamy, Vinola Nayak, Ullal Anand Reddy, Venugopal Rao, Arun Prasad J Pharm Bioallied Sci Dental Science - Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sealing ability of two self-etching adhesive systems and glass ionomer cement (GIC) lining Light cure (LC) under composite restorations in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class V cavities are prepared on the cervical third of the facial and lingual surfaces of primary molars. The specimens are then assigned into four experimental groups. The restored primary molars are stored in distilled water and subjected to thermocycling. Each section was examined using a stereomicroscope to assess dye penetration at the margin of the restoration and evaluated via pictures. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The degree of microleakage was analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test and the intergroup significance by multiple comparison analysis. RESULTS: The mean rank of the groups are Group I (Adper Prompt™ + Z−100) 19.44, Group II (UniFil BOND + Solare) 5.38, Group III (GIC lining LC + Z−100) 20.06, and Group IV (GIC lining LC + Solare) 21.13 with the P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Composite resin restorations bonded with two-step self-etching adhesive system (UniFil Bond) exhibited lesser microleakage than one-step self-etching adhesive system (Adperprompt™) in primary teeth. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4606652/ /pubmed/26538910 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.163525 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
spellingShingle Dental Science - Original Article
Pragasam, Ananda Xavier
Duraisamy, Vinola
Nayak, Ullal Anand
Reddy, Venugopal
Rao, Arun Prasad
Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study
title Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study
title_full Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study
title_short Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study
title_sort evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining lc under composite restoration in primary tooth: an in vitro study
topic Dental Science - Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538910
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.163525
work_keys_str_mv AT pragasamanandaxavier evaluationofsealingabilitytwoselfetchingadhesivesystemsandaglassionomerlininglcundercompositerestorationinprimarytoothaninvitrostudy
AT duraisamyvinola evaluationofsealingabilitytwoselfetchingadhesivesystemsandaglassionomerlininglcundercompositerestorationinprimarytoothaninvitrostudy
AT nayakullalanand evaluationofsealingabilitytwoselfetchingadhesivesystemsandaglassionomerlininglcundercompositerestorationinprimarytoothaninvitrostudy
AT reddyvenugopal evaluationofsealingabilitytwoselfetchingadhesivesystemsandaglassionomerlininglcundercompositerestorationinprimarytoothaninvitrostudy
AT raoarunprasad evaluationofsealingabilitytwoselfetchingadhesivesystemsandaglassionomerlininglcundercompositerestorationinprimarytoothaninvitrostudy