Cargando…

The contemporary role of Impella in a comprehensive mechanical circulatory support program: a single institutional experience

BACKGROUND: The treatment of cardiogenic shock with percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is attractive: however, at present it is not clear which is the best strategy, as no survival benefit has been demonstrated for any device as single therapy. Aim of this study is to describe the rol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Pieri, Marina, Contri, Rachele, Winterton, Dario, Montorfano, Matteo, Colombo, Antonio, Zangrillo, Alberto, De Bonis, Michele, Pappalardo, Federico
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2015
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0119-9

Ejemplares similares

Weaning from Impella and mobilization of Impella patients
por: Bertoldi, Letizia Fausta, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impella 5.0/5.5 Implantation via Innominate Artery: Further Expanding the Opportunities for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
por: Bertolin, Stephanie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Percutaneous Impella Mechanical Circulatory Support Delivery Using Intravascular Lithotripsy
por: Riley, Robert F., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

STATUS QUO 2020: what have we learned so far in temporary mechanical circulatory support? Use of Impella beyond the cathlab: open issues and clinical needs
por: Pappalardo, Federico, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of Thrombocytopenia in Patients Receiving Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support With an Impella Device
por: Houry, Erin A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index and Hemolysis during Impella-Incorporated Mechanical Circulatory Support
por: Nakamura, Makiko, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia under Mechanical Circulatory Support by Large Impella for Acute Cardiogenic Shock
por: Sugimura, Yukiharu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Full percutaneous biventricular support with two Impella pumps: the Bi‐Pella approach
por: Pappalardo, Federico, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high‐risk percutaneous coronary revascularization
por: Tarantini, Giuseppe, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Combined Venoarterial ECMO and Impella-CP Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Papillary Muscle Rupture
por: Ekanem, Emmanuel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impella 5.0 supported oncological surgery as bridge to LVAD
por: Montisci, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses
por: Ardito, Vittoria, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Circulatory support with Impella CP device during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: initial experience in Poland
por: Dudek, Dariusz, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France
por: Le Guyader, Alexandre, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Case series of transcatherter edge-to-edge repair using MitraClip(™) system with Impella(®) mechanical circulatory support
por: Tanaka, Shuhei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comprehensive Unloading Strategy for Rapid Heart Recovery Under Support With Impella
por: Yamamoto, Masayoshi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Mechanical circulatory support in high-risk PCI and acute coronary syndrome
por: Pappalardo, Federico, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Outcome of Patients Supported by Large Impella Systems After Re-implantation Due to Continued or Recurrent Need of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
por: Sugimura, Yukiharu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Duration of Impella 2.5 Circulatory Support and Length of Hospital Stay of Patients Undergoing High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
por: Anusionwu, Obiora, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Comparison of mechanical circulatory support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella for patients with cardiogenic shock: a propensity-matched analysis
por: Karatolios, Konstantinos, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Escalation and de-escalation of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
por: Bertoldi, Letizia F, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Is flow really continuous in last generation continuous flow Ventricular Assist Devices? A comparison between HeartMate II and HeartWare HVAD
por: Melisurgo, G, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Successful use of the Impella Recover LP 5.0 device for circulatory support during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
por: Pepino, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Minimally invasive biventricular mechanical circulatory support with Impella pumps as a bridge to heart transplantation: a first‐in‐the‐world case report
por: Varian, Kenneth, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Short-term mechanical circulatory support (intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, TandemHeart): a review
por: Wong, Alfred S. K., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impella RP for Patients with Acute Right Ventricular Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: A Subanalysis from the IMP-IT Registry
por: Botti, Giulia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Roadmap towards an institutional Impella programme for high‐risk coronary interventions
por: Pietrasik, Arkadiusz, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Trajectories of Cardiac Function Following Treatment With an Impella Device in Patients With Acute Anterior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
por: Tersalvi, Gregorio, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prolonged circulatory support with an Impella assist device in the management of cardiogenic shock associated with takotsubo syndrome, severe sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome
por: Foley, Edward D, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience
por: Ouweneel, Dagmar M, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients on Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support with Impella-CP for Cardiogenic Shock
por: Fahad, Fadi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Percutaneous coronary intervention using a mechanical circulatory support system with an Impella centrifugal pump device combined with subsequent cryoablation for atrial fibrillation
por: Winnicka-Zielińska, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Mechanical circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock: Rationale and design of the multicenter, investigator-initiated IMPELLA-PL registry
por: Pietrasik, Arkadiusz, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Hemodynamic Support Using Percutaneous Transfemoral Impella 5.0 and Impella RP for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock
por: Dalal, Pratik K., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock
por: Helgestad, Ole Kristian Lerche, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature
por: Subramaniam, Anna V., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Role of serum biomarkers in the diagnosis of infection in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
por: Pieri, M, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Does Impella Support Really Prevent Catastrophe?
por: Giblett, Joel P.
Publicado: (2020)

Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center
por: Pieri, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Unloading, ablation, bridging and transplant: different indications and treatments using the Impella 5.5 as longer-term circulatory support in one patient—an interdisciplinary case report
por: Volgmann, Constanze, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_g643cjcr64dmh5mqbhncnnc1m3