Cargando…

Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients

BACKGROUND: Maintaining the cuff pressure of endotracheal tubes (ETTs) within 20–30 cmH(2)O is a standard practice. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of standard practice in maintaining cuff pressure within the target range. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alzahrani, Amer R., Al Abbasi, Shatha, Abahoussin, Othman Khalid, Al Shehri, Tariq Othman, Al-Dorzi, Hasan M., Tamim, Hani M., Sadat, Musharaf, Arabi, Yaseen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26471790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0132-7
_version_ 1782395456132743168
author Alzahrani, Amer R.
Al Abbasi, Shatha
Abahoussin, Othman Khalid
Al Shehri, Tariq Othman
Al-Dorzi, Hasan M.
Tamim, Hani M.
Sadat, Musharaf
Arabi, Yaseen M.
author_facet Alzahrani, Amer R.
Al Abbasi, Shatha
Abahoussin, Othman Khalid
Al Shehri, Tariq Othman
Al-Dorzi, Hasan M.
Tamim, Hani M.
Sadat, Musharaf
Arabi, Yaseen M.
author_sort Alzahrani, Amer R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maintaining the cuff pressure of endotracheal tubes (ETTs) within 20–30 cmH(2)O is a standard practice. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of standard practice in maintaining cuff pressure within the target range. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary-care intensive care unit, in which respiratory therapists (RTs) measured the cuff pressure 6 hourly by a handheld manometer. In this study, a research RT checked cuff pressure 2–4 h after the clinical RT measurement. Percentages of patients with cuff pressure levels above and below the target range were calculated. We identified predictors of low-cuff pressure. RESULTS: We analyzed 2120 cuff-pressure measurements. The mean cuff pressure was 27 ± 2 cmH(2)O by the clinical RT and 21 ± 5 cmH(2)O by the research RT (p < 0.0001). The clinical RT documented that 98.0 % of cuff pressures were within the normal range. The research RT found the cuff pressures to be within the normal range in only 41.5 %, below the range in 53 % and above the range in 5.5 %. Low cuff pressure was found more common with lower ETT size (OR, 0.34 per 0.5 unit increase in ETT size; 95 % CI, 0.15–0.79) and with lower peak airway pressure (OR per one cm H(2)O increment, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.87–0.99) on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Cuff pressure is frequently not maintained within the target range with low-cuff pressure being very common approximately 3 h after routine measurements. Low cuff pressure was associated with lower ETT size and lower peak airway pressure. There is a need to redesign the process for maintaining cuff pressure within the target range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4607016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46070162015-10-16 Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients Alzahrani, Amer R. Al Abbasi, Shatha Abahoussin, Othman Khalid Al Shehri, Tariq Othman Al-Dorzi, Hasan M. Tamim, Hani M. Sadat, Musharaf Arabi, Yaseen M. BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Maintaining the cuff pressure of endotracheal tubes (ETTs) within 20–30 cmH(2)O is a standard practice. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of standard practice in maintaining cuff pressure within the target range. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary-care intensive care unit, in which respiratory therapists (RTs) measured the cuff pressure 6 hourly by a handheld manometer. In this study, a research RT checked cuff pressure 2–4 h after the clinical RT measurement. Percentages of patients with cuff pressure levels above and below the target range were calculated. We identified predictors of low-cuff pressure. RESULTS: We analyzed 2120 cuff-pressure measurements. The mean cuff pressure was 27 ± 2 cmH(2)O by the clinical RT and 21 ± 5 cmH(2)O by the research RT (p < 0.0001). The clinical RT documented that 98.0 % of cuff pressures were within the normal range. The research RT found the cuff pressures to be within the normal range in only 41.5 %, below the range in 53 % and above the range in 5.5 %. Low cuff pressure was found more common with lower ETT size (OR, 0.34 per 0.5 unit increase in ETT size; 95 % CI, 0.15–0.79) and with lower peak airway pressure (OR per one cm H(2)O increment, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.87–0.99) on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Cuff pressure is frequently not maintained within the target range with low-cuff pressure being very common approximately 3 h after routine measurements. Low cuff pressure was associated with lower ETT size and lower peak airway pressure. There is a need to redesign the process for maintaining cuff pressure within the target range. BioMed Central 2015-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4607016/ /pubmed/26471790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0132-7 Text en © Alzahrani et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alzahrani, Amer R.
Al Abbasi, Shatha
Abahoussin, Othman Khalid
Al Shehri, Tariq Othman
Al-Dorzi, Hasan M.
Tamim, Hani M.
Sadat, Musharaf
Arabi, Yaseen M.
Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients
title Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients
title_full Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients
title_fullStr Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients
title_short Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients
title_sort prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26471790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0132-7
work_keys_str_mv AT alzahraniamerr prevalenceandpredictorsofoutofrangecuffpressureofendotrachealandtracheostomytubesaprospectivecohortstudyinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT alabbasishatha prevalenceandpredictorsofoutofrangecuffpressureofendotrachealandtracheostomytubesaprospectivecohortstudyinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT abahoussinothmankhalid prevalenceandpredictorsofoutofrangecuffpressureofendotrachealandtracheostomytubesaprospectivecohortstudyinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT alshehritariqothman prevalenceandpredictorsofoutofrangecuffpressureofendotrachealandtracheostomytubesaprospectivecohortstudyinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT aldorzihasanm prevalenceandpredictorsofoutofrangecuffpressureofendotrachealandtracheostomytubesaprospectivecohortstudyinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT tamimhanim prevalenceandpredictorsofoutofrangecuffpressureofendotrachealandtracheostomytubesaprospectivecohortstudyinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT sadatmusharaf prevalenceandpredictorsofoutofrangecuffpressureofendotrachealandtracheostomytubesaprospectivecohortstudyinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT arabiyaseenm prevalenceandpredictorsofoutofrangecuffpressureofendotrachealandtracheostomytubesaprospectivecohortstudyinmechanicallyventilatedpatients