Cargando…

Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities

As part of exposure assessment for an ongoing epidemiologic study of heart disease and fine particle exposures in aluminum industry, area particle samples were collected in production facilities to assess instrument reliability and particle size distribution at different process areas. Personal modu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Sa, Noth, Elizabeth M., Dixon-Ernst, Christine, Eisen, Ellen A., Cullen, Mark R., Hammond, S. Katharine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478760
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ep.v3n4p79
_version_ 1782395458700705792
author Liu, Sa
Noth, Elizabeth M.
Dixon-Ernst, Christine
Eisen, Ellen A.
Cullen, Mark R.
Hammond, S. Katharine
author_facet Liu, Sa
Noth, Elizabeth M.
Dixon-Ernst, Christine
Eisen, Ellen A.
Cullen, Mark R.
Hammond, S. Katharine
author_sort Liu, Sa
collection PubMed
description As part of exposure assessment for an ongoing epidemiologic study of heart disease and fine particle exposures in aluminum industry, area particle samples were collected in production facilities to assess instrument reliability and particle size distribution at different process areas. Personal modular impactors (PMI) and Minimicro-orifice uniform deposition impactors (MiniMOUDI) were used. The coefficient of variation (CV) of co-located samples was used to evaluate the reproducibility of the samplers. PM(2.5) measured by PMI was compared to PM(2.5) calculated from MiniMOUDI data. Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and concentrations of sub-micrometer (PM(1.0)) and quasi-ultrafine (PM(0.56)) particles were evaluated to characterize particle size distribution. Most of CVs were less than 30%. The slope of the linear regression of PMI_PM(2.5) versus MiniMOUDI_PM(2.5) was 1.03 mg/m(3) per mg/m(3) (± 0.05), with correlation coefficient of 0.97 (± 0.01). Particle size distribution varied substantively in smelters, whereas it was less variable in fabrication units with significantly smaller MMADs (arithmetic mean of MMADs: 2.59 μm in smelters vs. 1.31 μm in fabrication units, p = 0.001). Although the total particle concentration was more than two times higher in the smelters than in the fabrication units, the fraction of PM(10) which was PM(1.0) or PM(0.56) was significantly lower in the smelters than in the fabrication units (p < 0.001). Consequently, the concentrations of sub-micrometer and quasi-ultrafine particles were similar in these two types of facilities. It would appear, studies evaluating ultrafine particle exposure in aluminum industry should focus on not only the smelters, but also the fabrication facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4607067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46070672015-10-15 Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities Liu, Sa Noth, Elizabeth M. Dixon-Ernst, Christine Eisen, Ellen A. Cullen, Mark R. Hammond, S. Katharine Environ Pollut (Tor) Article As part of exposure assessment for an ongoing epidemiologic study of heart disease and fine particle exposures in aluminum industry, area particle samples were collected in production facilities to assess instrument reliability and particle size distribution at different process areas. Personal modular impactors (PMI) and Minimicro-orifice uniform deposition impactors (MiniMOUDI) were used. The coefficient of variation (CV) of co-located samples was used to evaluate the reproducibility of the samplers. PM(2.5) measured by PMI was compared to PM(2.5) calculated from MiniMOUDI data. Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and concentrations of sub-micrometer (PM(1.0)) and quasi-ultrafine (PM(0.56)) particles were evaluated to characterize particle size distribution. Most of CVs were less than 30%. The slope of the linear regression of PMI_PM(2.5) versus MiniMOUDI_PM(2.5) was 1.03 mg/m(3) per mg/m(3) (± 0.05), with correlation coefficient of 0.97 (± 0.01). Particle size distribution varied substantively in smelters, whereas it was less variable in fabrication units with significantly smaller MMADs (arithmetic mean of MMADs: 2.59 μm in smelters vs. 1.31 μm in fabrication units, p = 0.001). Although the total particle concentration was more than two times higher in the smelters than in the fabrication units, the fraction of PM(10) which was PM(1.0) or PM(0.56) was significantly lower in the smelters than in the fabrication units (p < 0.001). Consequently, the concentrations of sub-micrometer and quasi-ultrafine particles were similar in these two types of facilities. It would appear, studies evaluating ultrafine particle exposure in aluminum industry should focus on not only the smelters, but also the fabrication facilities. 2014-09-24 2014-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4607067/ /pubmed/26478760 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ep.v3n4p79 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Sa
Noth, Elizabeth M.
Dixon-Ernst, Christine
Eisen, Ellen A.
Cullen, Mark R.
Hammond, S. Katharine
Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities
title Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities
title_full Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities
title_fullStr Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities
title_full_unstemmed Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities
title_short Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities
title_sort particle size distribution in aluminum manufacturing facilities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478760
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ep.v3n4p79
work_keys_str_mv AT liusa particlesizedistributioninaluminummanufacturingfacilities
AT nothelizabethm particlesizedistributioninaluminummanufacturingfacilities
AT dixonernstchristine particlesizedistributioninaluminummanufacturingfacilities
AT eisenellena particlesizedistributioninaluminummanufacturingfacilities
AT cullenmarkr particlesizedistributioninaluminummanufacturingfacilities
AT hammondskatharine particlesizedistributioninaluminummanufacturingfacilities