Cargando…

Implementing electronic patient record systems (EPRs) into England’s acute, mental health and community care trusts: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to explore the approaches to and the challenges and benefits of implementing Electronic Patient Record systems (EPRs) into NHS acute, mental health and community care hospitals throughout England. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was adopted that comprised an online survey (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarke, Arabella, Adamson, Joy, Sheard, Laura, Cairns, Paul, Watt, Ian, Wright, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0204-0
_version_ 1782395463856553984
author Clarke, Arabella
Adamson, Joy
Sheard, Laura
Cairns, Paul
Watt, Ian
Wright, John
author_facet Clarke, Arabella
Adamson, Joy
Sheard, Laura
Cairns, Paul
Watt, Ian
Wright, John
author_sort Clarke, Arabella
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aim was to explore the approaches to and the challenges and benefits of implementing Electronic Patient Record systems (EPRs) into NHS acute, mental health and community care hospitals throughout England. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was adopted that comprised an online survey (n = 59) and semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 8) with chief information officers (or heads of EPR projects) at NHS trusts throughout England. Survey analysis was descriptive, whilst the qualitative interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: A range of devices and approaches to implementing EPRs were described with 32 % of survey respondents utilising a best of breed approach. Interviewees’ perceived and expected benefits of implementing an EPR included efficiency, availability and accessibility of clinical information, and patient safety. Key challenges to EPR implementation were securing clinician involvement, difficulties posed by government and national policy and limited availability of financial and human resources. CONCLUSIONS: There was no single approach regarding the approaches taken to implementing EPRs among participating English NHS trusts, with various benefits and challenges cited. Policymakers and researchers need to provide clearer guidance for trusts at various stages of implementation ensuring intelligence is shared across England’s NHS trusts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0204-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4607108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46071082015-10-16 Implementing electronic patient record systems (EPRs) into England’s acute, mental health and community care trusts: a mixed methods study Clarke, Arabella Adamson, Joy Sheard, Laura Cairns, Paul Watt, Ian Wright, John BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Our aim was to explore the approaches to and the challenges and benefits of implementing Electronic Patient Record systems (EPRs) into NHS acute, mental health and community care hospitals throughout England. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was adopted that comprised an online survey (n = 59) and semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 8) with chief information officers (or heads of EPR projects) at NHS trusts throughout England. Survey analysis was descriptive, whilst the qualitative interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: A range of devices and approaches to implementing EPRs were described with 32 % of survey respondents utilising a best of breed approach. Interviewees’ perceived and expected benefits of implementing an EPR included efficiency, availability and accessibility of clinical information, and patient safety. Key challenges to EPR implementation were securing clinician involvement, difficulties posed by government and national policy and limited availability of financial and human resources. CONCLUSIONS: There was no single approach regarding the approaches taken to implementing EPRs among participating English NHS trusts, with various benefits and challenges cited. Policymakers and researchers need to provide clearer guidance for trusts at various stages of implementation ensuring intelligence is shared across England’s NHS trusts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0204-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4607108/ /pubmed/26466894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0204-0 Text en © Clarke et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Clarke, Arabella
Adamson, Joy
Sheard, Laura
Cairns, Paul
Watt, Ian
Wright, John
Implementing electronic patient record systems (EPRs) into England’s acute, mental health and community care trusts: a mixed methods study
title Implementing electronic patient record systems (EPRs) into England’s acute, mental health and community care trusts: a mixed methods study
title_full Implementing electronic patient record systems (EPRs) into England’s acute, mental health and community care trusts: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Implementing electronic patient record systems (EPRs) into England’s acute, mental health and community care trusts: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Implementing electronic patient record systems (EPRs) into England’s acute, mental health and community care trusts: a mixed methods study
title_short Implementing electronic patient record systems (EPRs) into England’s acute, mental health and community care trusts: a mixed methods study
title_sort implementing electronic patient record systems (eprs) into england’s acute, mental health and community care trusts: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0204-0
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkearabella implementingelectronicpatientrecordsystemseprsintoenglandsacutementalhealthandcommunitycaretrustsamixedmethodsstudy
AT adamsonjoy implementingelectronicpatientrecordsystemseprsintoenglandsacutementalhealthandcommunitycaretrustsamixedmethodsstudy
AT sheardlaura implementingelectronicpatientrecordsystemseprsintoenglandsacutementalhealthandcommunitycaretrustsamixedmethodsstudy
AT cairnspaul implementingelectronicpatientrecordsystemseprsintoenglandsacutementalhealthandcommunitycaretrustsamixedmethodsstudy
AT wattian implementingelectronicpatientrecordsystemseprsintoenglandsacutementalhealthandcommunitycaretrustsamixedmethodsstudy
AT wrightjohn implementingelectronicpatientrecordsystemseprsintoenglandsacutementalhealthandcommunitycaretrustsamixedmethodsstudy