Cargando…

Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study

BACKGROUND: Enhanced cardiovascular secondary preventive follow-up is needed to improve adherence to recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure (BP) levels. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high risk of recurrent events. Seco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakobsson, Stina, Irewall, Anna-Lotta, Bjorklund, Fredrik, Mooe, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0115-0
_version_ 1782395471962046464
author Jakobsson, Stina
Irewall, Anna-Lotta
Bjorklund, Fredrik
Mooe, Thomas
author_facet Jakobsson, Stina
Irewall, Anna-Lotta
Bjorklund, Fredrik
Mooe, Thomas
author_sort Jakobsson, Stina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced cardiovascular secondary preventive follow-up is needed to improve adherence to recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure (BP) levels. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high risk of recurrent events. Secondary prevention is therefore essential in these patients. METHODS: Patients with acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or transient ischemic attack were randomized to nurse-based telephone follow-up (intervention) or usual care (control). LDL-C and BP were measured at 1 month (baseline) and 12 months post-discharge. Intervention patients with above-target values at baseline received medication titration to achieve treatment goals. Values measured for control patients were given to the patient’s general practitioner for assessment. RESULTS: The final analyses included 225 intervention and 215 control patients with DM or CKD. Among patients with above-target baseline values, the following 12-month values were recorded for intervention and control patients, respectively: LDL-C, 2.2 versus 3.0 mmol/L (p < 0.001); and median systolic BP (SBP), 140 versus 145 mmHg (p = 0.26). Among patients with above-target values at baseline, 52.3 % of intervention patients reached target LDL-C values at 12 months versus 21.3 % of control patients (absolute difference of 30.9 %, 95 % CI 16.1 to 43.8 %), and there was a non-significant trend of more intervention patients reaching target SBP (49.4 % versus 36.8 %; absolute difference of 12.6 %, 95 % CI −1.7 to 26.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular secondary prevention with nurse-based telephone follow-up was more effective than usual care in improving LDL-C levels 12 months after discharge for patients with DM or CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry; ISRCTN96595458 (date of registration 10 July 2011) and ISRCTN23868518 (date of registration 13 May 2012). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-015-0115-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4607173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46071732015-10-16 Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study Jakobsson, Stina Irewall, Anna-Lotta Bjorklund, Fredrik Mooe, Thomas BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced cardiovascular secondary preventive follow-up is needed to improve adherence to recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure (BP) levels. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high risk of recurrent events. Secondary prevention is therefore essential in these patients. METHODS: Patients with acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or transient ischemic attack were randomized to nurse-based telephone follow-up (intervention) or usual care (control). LDL-C and BP were measured at 1 month (baseline) and 12 months post-discharge. Intervention patients with above-target values at baseline received medication titration to achieve treatment goals. Values measured for control patients were given to the patient’s general practitioner for assessment. RESULTS: The final analyses included 225 intervention and 215 control patients with DM or CKD. Among patients with above-target baseline values, the following 12-month values were recorded for intervention and control patients, respectively: LDL-C, 2.2 versus 3.0 mmol/L (p < 0.001); and median systolic BP (SBP), 140 versus 145 mmHg (p = 0.26). Among patients with above-target values at baseline, 52.3 % of intervention patients reached target LDL-C values at 12 months versus 21.3 % of control patients (absolute difference of 30.9 %, 95 % CI 16.1 to 43.8 %), and there was a non-significant trend of more intervention patients reaching target SBP (49.4 % versus 36.8 %; absolute difference of 12.6 %, 95 % CI −1.7 to 26.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular secondary prevention with nurse-based telephone follow-up was more effective than usual care in improving LDL-C levels 12 months after discharge for patients with DM or CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry; ISRCTN96595458 (date of registration 10 July 2011) and ISRCTN23868518 (date of registration 13 May 2012). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-015-0115-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4607173/ /pubmed/26466804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0115-0 Text en © Jakobsson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jakobsson, Stina
Irewall, Anna-Lotta
Bjorklund, Fredrik
Mooe, Thomas
Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_full Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_fullStr Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_short Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
title_sort cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0115-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jakobssonstina cardiovascularsecondarypreventioninhighriskpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy
AT irewallannalotta cardiovascularsecondarypreventioninhighriskpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy
AT bjorklundfredrik cardiovascularsecondarypreventioninhighriskpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy
AT mooethomas cardiovascularsecondarypreventioninhighriskpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialsubstudy