Cargando…

Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines

BACKGROUND: The correlation between normal cardiac chamber linear dimensions measured during retrospective coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to transthoracic echocardiography using the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines is not well established. METHODS: We performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Michael, Rubal, Bernard, Hulten, Edward, Slim, Jennifer N, Steel, Kevin, Furgerson, James L, Villines, Todd C, Slim, Ahmad M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312114522789
_version_ 1782395481908838400
author Rose, Michael
Rubal, Bernard
Hulten, Edward
Slim, Jennifer N
Steel, Kevin
Furgerson, James L
Villines, Todd C
Slim, Ahmad M
author_facet Rose, Michael
Rubal, Bernard
Hulten, Edward
Slim, Jennifer N
Steel, Kevin
Furgerson, James L
Villines, Todd C
Slim, Ahmad M
author_sort Rose, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The correlation between normal cardiac chamber linear dimensions measured during retrospective coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to transthoracic echocardiography using the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines is not well established. METHODS: We performed a review from January 2005 to July 2011 to identify subjects with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomographic angiography scans for chest pain and transthoracic echocardiography with normal cardiac structures performed within 90 days. Dimensions were manually calculated in both imaging modalities in accordance with the American Society of Echocardiography published guidelines. Left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated on echocardiography manually using the Simpson’s formula and by coronary computed tomographic angiography using the end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes. RESULTS: We reviewed 532 studies, rejected 412 and had 120 cases for review with a median time between studies of 7 days (interquartile range (IQR(25,75)) = 0–22 days) with no correlation between the measurements made by coronary computed tomographic angiography and transthoracic echocardiography using Bland–Altman analysis. We generated coronary computed tomographic angiography cardiac dimension reference ranges for both genders for our population. CONCLUSION: Our findings represent a step towards generating cardiac chamber dimensions’ reference ranges for coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to transthoracic echocardiography in patients with normal cardiac morphology and function using the American Society of Echocardiography guideline measurements that are commonly used by cardiologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4607219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46072192016-01-14 Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines Rose, Michael Rubal, Bernard Hulten, Edward Slim, Jennifer N Steel, Kevin Furgerson, James L Villines, Todd C Slim, Ahmad M SAGE Open Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The correlation between normal cardiac chamber linear dimensions measured during retrospective coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to transthoracic echocardiography using the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines is not well established. METHODS: We performed a review from January 2005 to July 2011 to identify subjects with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomographic angiography scans for chest pain and transthoracic echocardiography with normal cardiac structures performed within 90 days. Dimensions were manually calculated in both imaging modalities in accordance with the American Society of Echocardiography published guidelines. Left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated on echocardiography manually using the Simpson’s formula and by coronary computed tomographic angiography using the end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes. RESULTS: We reviewed 532 studies, rejected 412 and had 120 cases for review with a median time between studies of 7 days (interquartile range (IQR(25,75)) = 0–22 days) with no correlation between the measurements made by coronary computed tomographic angiography and transthoracic echocardiography using Bland–Altman analysis. We generated coronary computed tomographic angiography cardiac dimension reference ranges for both genders for our population. CONCLUSION: Our findings represent a step towards generating cardiac chamber dimensions’ reference ranges for coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to transthoracic echocardiography in patients with normal cardiac morphology and function using the American Society of Echocardiography guideline measurements that are commonly used by cardiologists. SAGE Publications 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4607219/ /pubmed/26770706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312114522789 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Original Article
Rose, Michael
Rubal, Bernard
Hulten, Edward
Slim, Jennifer N
Steel, Kevin
Furgerson, James L
Villines, Todd C
Slim, Ahmad M
Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines
title Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines
title_full Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines
title_fullStr Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines
title_short Chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using American Society of Echocardiography guidelines
title_sort chamber dimensions and functional assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography as compared to echocardiography using american society of echocardiography guidelines
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312114522789
work_keys_str_mv AT rosemichael chamberdimensionsandfunctionalassessmentwithcoronarycomputedtomographicangiographyascomparedtoechocardiographyusingamericansocietyofechocardiographyguidelines
AT rubalbernard chamberdimensionsandfunctionalassessmentwithcoronarycomputedtomographicangiographyascomparedtoechocardiographyusingamericansocietyofechocardiographyguidelines
AT hultenedward chamberdimensionsandfunctionalassessmentwithcoronarycomputedtomographicangiographyascomparedtoechocardiographyusingamericansocietyofechocardiographyguidelines
AT slimjennifern chamberdimensionsandfunctionalassessmentwithcoronarycomputedtomographicangiographyascomparedtoechocardiographyusingamericansocietyofechocardiographyguidelines
AT steelkevin chamberdimensionsandfunctionalassessmentwithcoronarycomputedtomographicangiographyascomparedtoechocardiographyusingamericansocietyofechocardiographyguidelines
AT furgersonjamesl chamberdimensionsandfunctionalassessmentwithcoronarycomputedtomographicangiographyascomparedtoechocardiographyusingamericansocietyofechocardiographyguidelines
AT villinestoddc chamberdimensionsandfunctionalassessmentwithcoronarycomputedtomographicangiographyascomparedtoechocardiographyusingamericansocietyofechocardiographyguidelines
AT slimahmadm chamberdimensionsandfunctionalassessmentwithcoronarycomputedtomographicangiographyascomparedtoechocardiographyusingamericansocietyofechocardiographyguidelines