Cargando…
What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits
The coral reefs of Tanga, Tanzania were recognized as a national conservation priority in the early 1970s, but the lack of a management response led to damage by dynamite, beach seines, and high numbers of fishers until the mid 1990s. Subsequently, an Irish Aid funded IUCN Eastern Africa program ope...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138769 |
_version_ | 1782395524978049024 |
---|---|
author | McClanahan, Timothy R. Muthiga, Nyawira A. Abunge, Caroline Kamukuru, Albogast T. Mwakalapa, Eliezer Kalombo, Hassan |
author_facet | McClanahan, Timothy R. Muthiga, Nyawira A. Abunge, Caroline Kamukuru, Albogast T. Mwakalapa, Eliezer Kalombo, Hassan |
author_sort | McClanahan, Timothy R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The coral reefs of Tanga, Tanzania were recognized as a national conservation priority in the early 1970s, but the lack of a management response led to damage by dynamite, beach seines, and high numbers of fishers until the mid 1990s. Subsequently, an Irish Aid funded IUCN Eastern Africa program operated from 1994 to mid 2007 to implement increased management aimed at reducing these impacts. The main effects of this management were to establish collaborative management areas, reduce dynamite and seine net fishing, and establish small community fisheries closures beginning in 1996. The ecology of the coral reefs was studied just prior to the initiation of this management in 1996, during, 2004, and a few years after the project ended in 2010. The perceptions of resource users towards management options were evaluated in 2010. The ecological studies indicated that the biomass of fish rose continuously during this period from 260 to 770 kg/ha but the small closures were no different from the non-closure areas. The benthic community studies indicate stability in the coral cover and community composition and an increase in coralline algae and topographic complexity over time. The lack of change in the coral community suggests resilience to various disturbances including fisheries management and the warm temperature anomaly of 1998. These results indicate that some aspects of the management program had been ecologically successful even after the donor program ended. Moreover, the increased compliance with seine net use and dynamite restrictions were the most likely factors causing this increase in fish biomass and not the closures. Resource users interviewed in 2010 were supportive of gear restrictions but there was considerable between-community disagreement over the value of specific restrictions. The social-ecological results suggest that increased compliance with gear restrictions is largely responsible for the improvements in reef ecology and is a high priority for future management programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4607501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46075012015-10-29 What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits McClanahan, Timothy R. Muthiga, Nyawira A. Abunge, Caroline Kamukuru, Albogast T. Mwakalapa, Eliezer Kalombo, Hassan PLoS One Research Article The coral reefs of Tanga, Tanzania were recognized as a national conservation priority in the early 1970s, but the lack of a management response led to damage by dynamite, beach seines, and high numbers of fishers until the mid 1990s. Subsequently, an Irish Aid funded IUCN Eastern Africa program operated from 1994 to mid 2007 to implement increased management aimed at reducing these impacts. The main effects of this management were to establish collaborative management areas, reduce dynamite and seine net fishing, and establish small community fisheries closures beginning in 1996. The ecology of the coral reefs was studied just prior to the initiation of this management in 1996, during, 2004, and a few years after the project ended in 2010. The perceptions of resource users towards management options were evaluated in 2010. The ecological studies indicated that the biomass of fish rose continuously during this period from 260 to 770 kg/ha but the small closures were no different from the non-closure areas. The benthic community studies indicate stability in the coral cover and community composition and an increase in coralline algae and topographic complexity over time. The lack of change in the coral community suggests resilience to various disturbances including fisheries management and the warm temperature anomaly of 1998. These results indicate that some aspects of the management program had been ecologically successful even after the donor program ended. Moreover, the increased compliance with seine net use and dynamite restrictions were the most likely factors causing this increase in fish biomass and not the closures. Resource users interviewed in 2010 were supportive of gear restrictions but there was considerable between-community disagreement over the value of specific restrictions. The social-ecological results suggest that increased compliance with gear restrictions is largely responsible for the improvements in reef ecology and is a high priority for future management programs. Public Library of Science 2015-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4607501/ /pubmed/26469979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138769 Text en © 2015 McClanahan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McClanahan, Timothy R. Muthiga, Nyawira A. Abunge, Caroline Kamukuru, Albogast T. Mwakalapa, Eliezer Kalombo, Hassan What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits |
title | What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits |
title_full | What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits |
title_fullStr | What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits |
title_full_unstemmed | What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits |
title_short | What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits |
title_sort | what happens after conservation and management donors leave? a before and after study of coral reef ecology and stakeholder perceptions of management benefits |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138769 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcclanahantimothyr whathappensafterconservationandmanagementdonorsleaveabeforeandafterstudyofcoralreefecologyandstakeholderperceptionsofmanagementbenefits AT muthiganyawiraa whathappensafterconservationandmanagementdonorsleaveabeforeandafterstudyofcoralreefecologyandstakeholderperceptionsofmanagementbenefits AT abungecaroline whathappensafterconservationandmanagementdonorsleaveabeforeandafterstudyofcoralreefecologyandstakeholderperceptionsofmanagementbenefits AT kamukurualbogastt whathappensafterconservationandmanagementdonorsleaveabeforeandafterstudyofcoralreefecologyandstakeholderperceptionsofmanagementbenefits AT mwakalapaeliezer whathappensafterconservationandmanagementdonorsleaveabeforeandafterstudyofcoralreefecologyandstakeholderperceptionsofmanagementbenefits AT kalombohassan whathappensafterconservationandmanagementdonorsleaveabeforeandafterstudyofcoralreefecologyandstakeholderperceptionsofmanagementbenefits |