Cargando…

The inconstancy of the transient climate response parameter under increasing CO(2)

In the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), the model-mean increase in global mean surface air temperature T under the 1pctCO2 scenario (atmospheric CO(2) increasing at 1% yr(−1)) during the second doubling of CO(2) is 40% larger than the transient climate response (TCR), i.e. the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregory, J. M., Andrews, T., Good, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26438279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0417
Descripción
Sumario:In the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), the model-mean increase in global mean surface air temperature T under the 1pctCO2 scenario (atmospheric CO(2) increasing at 1% yr(−1)) during the second doubling of CO(2) is 40% larger than the transient climate response (TCR), i.e. the increase in T during the first doubling. We identify four possible contributory effects. First, the surface climate system loses heat less readily into the ocean beneath as the latter warms. The model spread in the thermal coupling between the upper and deep ocean largely explains the model spread in ocean heat uptake efficiency. Second, CO(2) radiative forcing may rise more rapidly than logarithmically with CO(2) concentration. Third, the climate feedback parameter may decline as the CO(2) concentration rises. With CMIP5 data, we cannot distinguish the second and third possibilities. Fourth, the climate feedback parameter declines as time passes or T rises; in 1pctCO2, this effect is less important than the others. We find that T projected for the end of the twenty-first century correlates more highly with T at the time of quadrupled CO(2) in 1pctCO2 than with the TCR, and we suggest that the TCR may be underestimated from observed climate change.