Cargando…

Weighting climate model projections using observational constraints

Projected climate change integrates the net response to multiple climate feedbacks. Whereas existing long-term climate change projections are typically based on unweighted individual climate model simulations, as observed climate change intensifies it is increasingly becoming possible to constrain t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gillett, Nathan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26438283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0425
_version_ 1782395596087230464
author Gillett, Nathan P.
author_facet Gillett, Nathan P.
author_sort Gillett, Nathan P.
collection PubMed
description Projected climate change integrates the net response to multiple climate feedbacks. Whereas existing long-term climate change projections are typically based on unweighted individual climate model simulations, as observed climate change intensifies it is increasingly becoming possible to constrain the net response to feedbacks and hence projected warming directly from observed climate change. One approach scales simulated future warming based on a fit to observations over the historical period, but this approach is only accurate for near-term projections and for scenarios of continuously increasing radiative forcing. For this reason, the recent Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR5) included such observationally constrained projections in its assessment of warming to 2035, but used raw model projections of longer term warming to 2100. Here a simple approach to weighting model projections based on an observational constraint is proposed which does not assume a linear relationship between past and future changes. This approach is used to weight model projections of warming in 2081–2100 relative to 1986–2005 under the Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 forcing scenario, based on an observationally constrained estimate of the Transient Climate Response derived from a detection and attribution analysis. The resulting observationally constrained 5–95% warming range of 0.8–2.5 K is somewhat lower than the unweighted range of 1.1–2.6 K reported in the IPCC AR5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4608039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46080392015-11-13 Weighting climate model projections using observational constraints Gillett, Nathan P. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles Projected climate change integrates the net response to multiple climate feedbacks. Whereas existing long-term climate change projections are typically based on unweighted individual climate model simulations, as observed climate change intensifies it is increasingly becoming possible to constrain the net response to feedbacks and hence projected warming directly from observed climate change. One approach scales simulated future warming based on a fit to observations over the historical period, but this approach is only accurate for near-term projections and for scenarios of continuously increasing radiative forcing. For this reason, the recent Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR5) included such observationally constrained projections in its assessment of warming to 2035, but used raw model projections of longer term warming to 2100. Here a simple approach to weighting model projections based on an observational constraint is proposed which does not assume a linear relationship between past and future changes. This approach is used to weight model projections of warming in 2081–2100 relative to 1986–2005 under the Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 forcing scenario, based on an observationally constrained estimate of the Transient Climate Response derived from a detection and attribution analysis. The resulting observationally constrained 5–95% warming range of 0.8–2.5 K is somewhat lower than the unweighted range of 1.1–2.6 K reported in the IPCC AR5. The Royal Society Publishing 2015-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4608039/ /pubmed/26438283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0425 Text en © 2015 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Gillett, Nathan P.
Weighting climate model projections using observational constraints
title Weighting climate model projections using observational constraints
title_full Weighting climate model projections using observational constraints
title_fullStr Weighting climate model projections using observational constraints
title_full_unstemmed Weighting climate model projections using observational constraints
title_short Weighting climate model projections using observational constraints
title_sort weighting climate model projections using observational constraints
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26438283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0425
work_keys_str_mv AT gillettnathanp weightingclimatemodelprojectionsusingobservationalconstraints